From: Darren Salt <devspam@moreofthesa.me.uk>
To: christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: resize BAR0 to the maximum available size, even if it doesn't cover VRAM
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 19:48:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58E2C3B550%devspam@moreofthesa.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77805324-8fdc-8d72-f033-7d75ae04947e@gmail.com>
I demand that Christian König may or may not have written...
> Am 11.12.20 um 02:42 schrieb Darren Salt:
>> I demand that Christian König may or may not have written...
> [SNIP]
> Well I did wrote that :)
“did write”, surely…
>> I used dd:
>> # dd if=/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/amdgpu_vram bs=1048576 count=1 skip=6127 | hexdump -C |tail
> That won't work. amdgpu_vram uses a MMIO register pair to access VRAM which
> works even when it isn't CPU visible.
> Thinking more about it umr would probably use this as well, so that won't
> work either.
> You could try to use dd on /dev/mem with the offset of the BAR.
Looks like that's RAM accessed by physical address, so that won't work
either. And I do see dd reporting ‘bad address’.
>> Anyway I agree that a PCI subsystem quirk might be appropriated.
> I'm going to discuss AMD internally why you have such strange values in
> the RBAR registers.
I'm thinking probably an error by somebody at Sapphire, but we'll see…
Hopefully, that'll sort it out, at least for new cards. I doubt that mine's
the only one like this, and it seems likely that most already out there won't
be updated (shoudl there be new VBIOS releases as a reault).
Anyway, I have a quirk patch written now – untested as yet, and probably
going to be changed due to other changes before I do test it.
[snip]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-11 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-10 0:57 [PATCH] amdgpu: resize BAR0 to the maximum available size, even if it doesn't cover VRAM Darren Salt
2020-12-10 10:17 ` Christian König
2020-12-10 13:59 ` Darren Salt
2020-12-10 20:41 ` Christian König
2020-12-11 1:42 ` Darren Salt
2020-12-11 16:46 ` Christian König
2020-12-11 19:48 ` Darren Salt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58E2C3B550%devspam@moreofthesa.me.uk \
--to=devspam@moreofthesa.me.uk \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox