* [ath9k-devel] ath9k-devel digest: multi-vif vs multi-wiphy
@ 2010-04-29 15:35 "Lorna González"
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: "Lorna González" @ 2010-04-29 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
Hi all,
I am doing some tests creating multiple virtual interfaces as multi-vif and multi-wiphy in an ath9k and I have some questions related to it.
If I create multi-vif (and therefore one single channel is used) I should be able to connect i.e. two vif to two different BSS working on the same channel. But it does not work or at least not in my test. So, the multi-vif does not function like multi-wiphy, where the scheduler switches between radios (and therefore channels). So my question is, is it planned to create a kind of scheduler for the multi-vif to be able to connect them to different BSS or for some reasons it is not possible or irrelevant for the developer and if this is the case; is it always necessary to create first multi-wiphys and then assign a vif to each of them? or are you considered it for future changes?
Please correct me if some of my statements are wrong.
Thanks in advance for your response
Best regards
Lorna Glez.
--
GRATIS f?r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-04-29 15:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-29 15:35 [ath9k-devel] ath9k-devel digest: multi-vif vs multi-wiphy "Lorna González"
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox