* build backports-20140905 against 2.6.39 kernel failure
@ 2014-10-29 16:36 Eyal Ben-Sasson
2014-10-29 17:44 ` Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Ben-Sasson @ 2014-10-29 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: backports
I am trying to build backports-20140905 against 2.6.39 kernel and the
build fails on compat-3.0.c with the following:
backport-include/linux/compat.h:18:69: error: expected ‘;’, ‘,’ or ‘)’
before ‘*’ token
If I comment out the line in compat.h I get error on compat-3.5.c
ptp_clock_kernel.h:5:41: fatal error: linux/ptp_clock_kernel.h: No such
file or directory
I saw a previous Thread " 3.14-1 Compile Problem for 2.6.39.4 Kernel"
which looks similar, but in my case I have CRYPTO_CCM=m.
Any new suggestions?
I understand the backports is tested against 2.6.39 successfully. Where
can I see the 2.6.39 .config file?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: build backports-20140905 against 2.6.39 kernel failure
2014-10-29 16:36 build backports-20140905 against 2.6.39 kernel failure Eyal Ben-Sasson
@ 2014-10-29 17:44 ` Johannes Berg
2014-10-30 8:42 ` Eyal Ben-Sasson
2014-10-30 8:47 ` Eyal Ben-Sasson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2014-10-29 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eyal Ben-Sasson; +Cc: backports
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 18:36 +0200, Eyal Ben-Sasson wrote:
> I understand the backports is tested against 2.6.39 successfully. Where
> can I see the 2.6.39 .config file?
This is no longer the case, the oldest supported kernel is now 3.0.
johannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: build backports-20140905 against 2.6.39 kernel failure
2014-10-29 17:44 ` Johannes Berg
@ 2014-10-30 8:42 ` Eyal Ben-Sasson
2014-10-30 8:47 ` Eyal Ben-Sasson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Ben-Sasson @ 2014-10-30 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: backports
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 385 bytes --]
OK. Now I see it. I will go back to backports-3.14 and try it.
Thanx.
Eyal
On 10/29/2014 07:44 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 18:36 +0200, Eyal Ben-Sasson wrote:
>
>> I understand the backports is tested against 2.6.39 successfully. Where
>> can I see the 2.6.39 .config file?
> This is no longer the case, the oldest supported kernel is now 3.0.
>
> johannes
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1061 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: build backports-20140905 against 2.6.39 kernel failure
2014-10-29 17:44 ` Johannes Berg
2014-10-30 8:42 ` Eyal Ben-Sasson
@ 2014-10-30 8:47 ` Eyal Ben-Sasson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Ben-Sasson @ 2014-10-30 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: backports
OK. Now I see it. I will go back to backports-3.14 and try it.
Thanx.
Eyal
On 10/29/2014 07:44 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 18:36 +0200, Eyal Ben-Sasson wrote:
>
>> I understand the backports is tested against 2.6.39 successfully. Where
>> can I see the 2.6.39 .config file?
> This is no longer the case, the oldest supported kernel is now 3.0.
>
> johannes
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-30 8:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-29 16:36 build backports-20140905 against 2.6.39 kernel failure Eyal Ben-Sasson
2014-10-29 17:44 ` Johannes Berg
2014-10-30 8:42 ` Eyal Ben-Sasson
2014-10-30 8:47 ` Eyal Ben-Sasson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox