From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/17] BPF register bounds logic and testing improvements
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 16:10:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169894142879.27186.8286702726190146232.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231102033759.2541186-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 20:37:42 -0700 you wrote:
> This patch set adds a big set of manual and auto-generated test cases
> validating BPF verifier's register bounds tracking and deduction logic. See
> details in the last patch.
>
> We start with building a tester that validates existing <range> vs <scalar>
> verifier logic for range bounds. To make all this work, BPF verifier's logic
> needed a bunch of improvements to handle some cases that previously were not
> covered. This had no implications as to correctness of verifier logic, but it
> was incomplete enough to cause significant disagreements with alternative
> implementation of register bounds logic that tests in this patch set
> implement. So we need BPF verifier logic improvements to make all the tests
> pass. This is what we do in patches #3 through #9.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v6,bpf-next,01/17] selftests/bpf: fix RELEASE=1 build for tc_opts
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3cda0779ded1
- [v6,bpf-next,02/17] selftests/bpf: satisfy compiler by having explicit return in btf test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7bcc07dcd835
- [v6,bpf-next,03/17] bpf: derive smin/smax from umin/max bounds
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2e74aef782d3
- [v6,bpf-next,04/17] bpf: derive smin32/smax32 from umin32/umax32 bounds
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f188765f23a5
- [v6,bpf-next,05/17] bpf: derive subreg bounds from full bounds when upper 32 bits are constant
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f404ef3b42c8
- [v6,bpf-next,06/17] bpf: add special smin32/smax32 derivation from 64-bit bounds
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6533e0acff58
- [v6,bpf-next,07/17] bpf: improve deduction of 64-bit bounds from 32-bit bounds
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3d6940ddd9b5
- [v6,bpf-next,08/17] bpf: try harder to deduce register bounds from different numeric domains
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/558c06e551a3
- [v6,bpf-next,09/17] bpf: drop knowledge-losing __reg_combine_{32,64}_into_{64,32} logic
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b929d4979b2b
- [v6,bpf-next,10/17] selftests/bpf: BPF register range bounds tester
(no matching commit)
- [v6,bpf-next,11/17] bpf: rename is_branch_taken reg arguments to prepare for the second one
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cdeb5dab9238
- [v6,bpf-next,12/17] bpf: generalize is_branch_taken() to work with two registers
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fc3615dd0ee9
- [v6,bpf-next,13/17] bpf: move is_branch_taken() down
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/dd2a2cc3c1bf
- [v6,bpf-next,14/17] bpf: generalize is_branch_taken to handle all conditional jumps in one place
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/171de12646d2
- [v6,bpf-next,15/17] bpf: unify 32-bit and 64-bit is_branch_taken logic
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/761a9e560d0c
- [v6,bpf-next,16/17] bpf: prepare reg_set_min_max for second set of registers
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4c617286771e
- [v6,bpf-next,17/17] bpf: generalize reg_set_min_max() to handle two sets of two registers
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9a14d62a2cdb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-02 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-02 3:37 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/17] BPF register bounds logic and testing improvements Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 01/17] selftests/bpf: fix RELEASE=1 build for tc_opts Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 02/17] selftests/bpf: satisfy compiler by having explicit return in btf test Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 03/17] bpf: derive smin/smax from umin/max bounds Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 04/17] bpf: derive smin32/smax32 from umin32/umax32 bounds Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 05/17] bpf: derive subreg bounds from full bounds when upper 32 bits are constant Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 06/17] bpf: add special smin32/smax32 derivation from 64-bit bounds Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 07/17] bpf: improve deduction of 64-bit bounds from 32-bit bounds Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 14:39 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-11-02 16:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-03 3:43 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 08/17] bpf: try harder to deduce register bounds from different numeric domains Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 09/17] bpf: drop knowledge-losing __reg_combine_{32,64}_into_{64,32} logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 15:14 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 10/17] selftests/bpf: BPF register range bounds tester Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/17] bpf: rename is_branch_taken reg arguments to prepare for the second one Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 15:15 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 12/17] bpf: generalize is_branch_taken() to work with two registers Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 15:19 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 13/17] bpf: move is_branch_taken() down Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 14/17] bpf: generalize is_branch_taken to handle all conditional jumps in one place Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 15/17] bpf: unify 32-bit and 64-bit is_branch_taken logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 16/17] bpf: prepare reg_set_min_max for second set of registers Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 3:37 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 17/17] bpf: generalize reg_set_min_max() to handle two sets of two registers Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 16:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=169894142879.27186.8286702726190146232.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox