* [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show
@ 2026-09-11 14:03 Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
2026-09-11 14:24 ` luoxuanqiang
2026-09-11 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) @ 2026-09-11 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau
Cc: Amery Hung, Xuanqiang Luo, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, Fushuai Wang,
Weiming Shi, Matt Bobrowski, Kees Cook, Menglong Dong, bpf,
netdev, linux-kernel, AutonomousCodeSecurity, xmei5, tgopinath,
kys
Iterating a sk_storage map is a two-stage operation:
bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_find_next() returns a selem, then
__bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show() uses it. The latter re-reads
selem->local_storage via rcu_dereference() without checking for NULL.
A concurrent socket close can unlink the selem and clear that pointer
between the two stages, causing a NULL dereference of sk_storage->owner.
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical
address 0xdffffc0000000011
net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c:809 __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show()
bpf_seq_read+0x366/0x1120
vfs_read+0x174/0xa50
ksys_read+0xfc/0x1d0
Return SEQ_SKIP if the re-read yields NULL. This prevents the dereference
and tells bpf_seq_read() that the stale element was skipped, so it does
not consume an iterator sequence number without running the BPF program.
Fixes: 0be08389c7f2 ("bpf: Switch to bpf_selem_unlink_nofail in bpf_local_storage_{map_free, destroy}")
Reported-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260827051859.45511-1-blbllhy@gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Xuanqiang Luo <xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMB2axNFOC9G2RwOCnsWDth83REMWnmPE8gxMwbLYoGusw9miA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c3f2a61d-d5bc-454c-987d-717b5f8c8809@linux.dev/
Cc: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
Assisted-by: Copilot (Grok 4.6)
---
Changes in v2:
- Return SEQ_SKIP instead of 0 when the storage disappeared, preserving
the iterator sequence number for the next valid element.
- Correct the Fixes tag to the commit that switched the destruction path
to bpf_selem_unlink_nofail().
- Rebase onto the current bpf master branch.
net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index 1d295a8769fa..7d02245aa704 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -806,6 +806,8 @@ static int __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq,
ctx.map = info->map;
if (selem) {
sk_storage = rcu_dereference(selem->local_storage);
+ if (!sk_storage)
+ return SEQ_SKIP;
ctx.sk = sk_storage->owner;
ctx.value = SDATA(selem)->data;
}
base-commit: 15071f2a1263e82150c77eeb1e94dbfc31950a8e
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show
2026-09-11 14:03 [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
@ 2026-09-11 14:24 ` luoxuanqiang
2026-09-11 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: luoxuanqiang @ 2026-09-11 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
Cc: Amery Hung, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, Fushuai Wang, Weiming Shi,
Matt Bobrowski, Kees Cook, Menglong Dong, bpf, netdev,
linux-kernel, AutonomousCodeSecurity, xmei5, tgopinath, kys,
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau
在 2026/9/11 22:03, Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) 写道:
> Iterating a sk_storage map is a two-stage operation:
> bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_find_next() returns a selem, then
> __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show() uses it. The latter re-reads
> selem->local_storage via rcu_dereference() without checking for NULL.
> A concurrent socket close can unlink the selem and clear that pointer
> between the two stages, causing a NULL dereference of sk_storage->owner.
>
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical
> address 0xdffffc0000000011
> net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c:809 __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show()
> bpf_seq_read+0x366/0x1120
> vfs_read+0x174/0xa50
> ksys_read+0xfc/0x1d0
>
> Return SEQ_SKIP if the re-read yields NULL. This prevents the dereference
> and tells bpf_seq_read() that the stale element was skipped, so it does
> not consume an iterator sequence number without running the BPF program.
>
> Fixes: 0be08389c7f2 ("bpf: Switch to bpf_selem_unlink_nofail in bpf_local_storage_{map_free, destroy}")
> Reported-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260827051859.45511-1-blbllhy@gmail.com/
> Suggested-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Xuanqiang Luo <xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMB2axNFOC9G2RwOCnsWDth83REMWnmPE8gxMwbLYoGusw9miA@mail.gmail.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c3f2a61d-d5bc-454c-987d-717b5f8c8809@linux.dev/
> Cc: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
> Assisted-by: Copilot (Grok 4.6)
Reviewed-by: Xuanqiang Luo<luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
Thanks,
Xuanqiang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show
2026-09-11 14:03 [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
2026-09-11 14:24 ` luoxuanqiang
@ 2026-09-11 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 15:34 ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-09-11 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs); +Cc: bpf
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Passing `sk_storage->owner` to the BPF program in `__bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show` introduces a Use-After-Free for non-RCU-safe sockets because the socket memory can be synchronously freed concurrently.
--
commit 64d29cd038f4fabc766558da2cca84aac8eec45a
Author: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show
Iterating a sk_storage map is a two-stage operation:
bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_find_next() returns a selem, then
__bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show() uses it. The latter re-reads
selem->local_storage via rcu_dereference() without checking for NULL.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMB2axNFOC9G2RwOCnsWDth83REMWnmPE8gxMwbLYoGusw9miA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c3f2a61d-d5bc-454c-987d-717b5f8c8809@linux.dev/
> diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> index 1d295a8769fad..7d02245aa7049 100644
> --- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> +++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> @@ -806,6 +806,8 @@ static int __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq,
> ctx.map = info->map;
> if (selem) {
> sk_storage = rcu_dereference(selem->local_storage);
> + if (!sk_storage)
> + return SEQ_SKIP;
> ctx.sk = sk_storage->owner;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does assigning the socket pointer to ctx.sk
without taking a reference or ensuring RCU protection introduce a
use-after-free risk for non-RCU-safe sockets?
For sockets that are not RCU-safe, such as UNIX domain sockets, the socket
memory can be synchronously freed. If CPU 1 is delayed after reading
selem->local_storage in __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show(), CPU 2 can execute
the final sock_put() and call __sk_destruct().
Because SOCK_RCU_FREE is not set, __sk_destruct() immediately calls
bpf_sk_storage_free() followed by sk_prot_free(sk), which frees the socket
memory to the slab allocator.
When CPU 1 resumes, it will call bpf_iter_run_prog(prog, &ctx) with ctx.sk
pointing to freed memory.
> ctx.value = SDATA(selem)->data;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260911140308.81560-1-cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-11 15:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-11 14:03 [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __bpf_sk_storage_map_seq_show Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
2026-09-11 14:24 ` luoxuanqiang
2026-09-11 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 15:34 ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox