From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix get_func_ip offset test for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:15:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220811091526.172610-7-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220811091526.172610-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
With CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT enabled the test for kprobe with offset
won't work because of the extra endbr instruction.
As suggested by Andrii adding CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT detection
and using appropriate offset value based on that.
Also removing test7 program, because it does the same as test6.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c | 62 +++++++++++++++----
.../selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c | 20 +++---
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
index 938dbd4d7c2f..a4dab2fa2258 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "get_func_ip_test.skel.h"
-void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
+static int config_ibt;
+
+static void test_function_entry(void)
{
struct get_func_ip_test *skel = NULL;
int err, prog_fd;
@@ -12,14 +14,6 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "get_func_ip_test__open"))
return;
- /* test6 is x86_64 specifc because of the instruction
- * offset, disabling it for all other archs
- */
-#ifndef __x86_64__
- bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test6, false);
- bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test7, false);
-#endif
-
err = get_func_ip_test__load(skel);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_func_ip_test__load"))
goto cleanup;
@@ -38,16 +32,62 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+ config_ibt = skel->bss->config_ibt;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(config_ibt == 0 || config_ibt == 1, "config_ibt");
+ printf("%s:config_ibt %d\n", __func__, config_ibt);
+
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test1_result, 1, "test1_result");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test2_result, 1, "test2_result");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test3_result, 1, "test3_result");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test4_result, 1, "test4_result");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test5_result, 1, "test5_result");
+
+cleanup:
+ get_func_ip_test__destroy(skel);
+}
+
#ifdef __x86_64__
+static void test_function_body(void)
+{
+ struct get_func_ip_test *skel = NULL;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, kopts);
+ struct bpf_link *link6 = NULL;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ skel = get_func_ip_test__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "get_func_ip_test__open"))
+ return;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test6, true);
+
+ err = get_func_ip_test__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_func_ip_test__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ kopts.offset = config_ibt ? 9 : 5;
+
+ link6 = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.test6, "bpf_fentry_test6", &kopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link6, "link6"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test1);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_run");
+
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test6_result, 1, "test6_result");
- ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test7_result, 1, "test7_result");
-#endif
cleanup:
+ bpf_link__destroy(link6);
get_func_ip_test__destroy(skel);
}
+#else
+#define test_function_body(arg)
+#endif
+
+void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
+{
+ test_function_entry();
+ test_function_body();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
index 6db70757bc8b..cb8e58183d46 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -13,12 +14,19 @@ extern const void bpf_modify_return_test __ksym;
extern const void bpf_fentry_test6 __ksym;
extern const void bpf_fentry_test7 __ksym;
+extern bool CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT __kconfig __weak;
+
+bool config_ibt;
+
__u64 test1_result = 0;
SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
int BPF_PROG(test1, int a)
{
__u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+ /* just to propagate config option value to user space */
+ config_ibt = CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT;
+
test1_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
return 0;
}
@@ -64,7 +72,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test5, int a, int *b, int ret)
}
__u64 test6_result = 0;
-SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test6+0x5")
+SEC("?kprobe/")
int test6(struct pt_regs *ctx)
{
__u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
@@ -72,13 +80,3 @@ int test6(struct pt_regs *ctx)
test6_result = (const void *) addr == 0;
return 0;
}
-
-__u64 test7_result = 0;
-SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test7+5")
-int test7(struct pt_regs *ctx)
-{
- __u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
-
- test7_result = (const void *) addr == 0;
- return 0;
-}
--
2.37.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-11 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-11 9:15 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/6] kprobes: Add new KPROBE_FLAG_ON_FUNC_ENTRY kprobe flag Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16 7:01 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-30 15:08 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 8:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 12:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/6] ftrace: Keep the resolved addr in kallsyms_callback Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16 7:06 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 12:35 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-08 19:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Use given function address for trampoline ip arg Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17 13:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 4/6] bpf: Adjust kprobe_multi entry_ip for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Return value in kprobe get_func_ip only for entry address Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-08-16 3:25 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix get_func_ip offset test for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16 7:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16 10:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16 17:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16 17:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16 3:27 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes " Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220811091526.172610-7-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox