BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix get_func_ip offset test for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:15:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220811091526.172610-7-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220811091526.172610-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

With CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT enabled the test for kprobe with offset
won't work because of the extra endbr instruction.

As suggested by Andrii adding CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT detection
and using appropriate offset value based on that.

Also removing test7 program, because it does the same as test6.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c         | 62 +++++++++++++++----
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c    | 20 +++---
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
index 938dbd4d7c2f..a4dab2fa2258 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include "get_func_ip_test.skel.h"
 
-void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
+static int config_ibt;
+
+static void test_function_entry(void)
 {
 	struct get_func_ip_test *skel = NULL;
 	int err, prog_fd;
@@ -12,14 +14,6 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "get_func_ip_test__open"))
 		return;
 
-	/* test6 is x86_64 specifc because of the instruction
-	 * offset, disabling it for all other archs
-	 */
-#ifndef __x86_64__
-	bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test6, false);
-	bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test7, false);
-#endif
-
 	err = get_func_ip_test__load(skel);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_func_ip_test__load"))
 		goto cleanup;
@@ -38,16 +32,62 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
 
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
 
+	config_ibt = skel->bss->config_ibt;
+	ASSERT_TRUE(config_ibt == 0 || config_ibt == 1, "config_ibt");
+	printf("%s:config_ibt %d\n", __func__, config_ibt);
+
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test1_result, 1, "test1_result");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test2_result, 1, "test2_result");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test3_result, 1, "test3_result");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test4_result, 1, "test4_result");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test5_result, 1, "test5_result");
+
+cleanup:
+	get_func_ip_test__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 #ifdef __x86_64__
+static void test_function_body(void)
+{
+	struct get_func_ip_test *skel = NULL;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, kopts);
+	struct bpf_link *link6 = NULL;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	skel = get_func_ip_test__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "get_func_ip_test__open"))
+		return;
+
+	bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test6, true);
+
+	err = get_func_ip_test__load(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_func_ip_test__load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	kopts.offset = config_ibt ? 9 : 5;
+
+	link6 = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.test6, "bpf_fentry_test6", &kopts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link6, "link6"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test1);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_run");
+
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test6_result, 1, "test6_result");
-	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test7_result, 1, "test7_result");
-#endif
 
 cleanup:
+	bpf_link__destroy(link6);
 	get_func_ip_test__destroy(skel);
 }
+#else
+#define test_function_body(arg)
+#endif
+
+void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
+{
+	test_function_entry();
+	test_function_body();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
index 6db70757bc8b..cb8e58183d46 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
@@ -13,12 +14,19 @@ extern const void bpf_modify_return_test __ksym;
 extern const void bpf_fentry_test6 __ksym;
 extern const void bpf_fentry_test7 __ksym;
 
+extern bool CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT __kconfig __weak;
+
+bool config_ibt;
+
 __u64 test1_result = 0;
 SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
 int BPF_PROG(test1, int a)
 {
 	__u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
 
+	/* just to propagate config option value to user space */
+	config_ibt = CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT;
+
 	test1_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -64,7 +72,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test5, int a, int *b, int ret)
 }
 
 __u64 test6_result = 0;
-SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test6+0x5")
+SEC("?kprobe/")
 int test6(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 {
 	__u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
@@ -72,13 +80,3 @@ int test6(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 	test6_result = (const void *) addr == 0;
 	return 0;
 }
-
-__u64 test7_result = 0;
-SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test7+5")
-int test7(struct pt_regs *ctx)
-{
-	__u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
-
-	test7_result = (const void *) addr == 0;
-	return 0;
-}
-- 
2.37.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-11  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-11  9:15 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/6] kprobes: Add new KPROBE_FLAG_ON_FUNC_ENTRY kprobe flag Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15  9:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:10     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16  7:01         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-30 15:08   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08  8:26     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 12:01   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/6] ftrace: Keep the resolved addr in kallsyms_callback Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 10:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:30     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16  7:06         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 12:35   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-08 19:41     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Use given function address for trampoline ip arg Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 10:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:57     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17 13:40         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 4/6] bpf: Adjust kprobe_multi entry_ip for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Return value in kprobe get_func_ip only for entry address Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-08-16  3:25   ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix get_func_ip offset test for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16  7:00     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16 10:18       ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16 17:28         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16 17:19       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16  3:27 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes " Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220811091526.172610-7-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox