From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Use given function address for trampoline ip arg
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:51:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvpBVDP3FydnAtHA@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvomoyS/3Op8FAMa@krava>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:57:39PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:18:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:15:23AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > Using function address given at the generation time as the trampoline
> > > ip argument. This way we get directly the function address that we
> > > need, so we don't need to:
> > > - read the ip from the stack
> > > - subtract X86_PATCH_SIZE
> > > - subtract ENDBR_INSN_SIZE if CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT is enabled
> > > which is not even implemented yet ;-)
> >
> > Can you please tell me what all this does and why?
> >
>
> arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline prepares bpf trampoline for given function
> specified by 'func_addr' argument
The bpf trampoline is what's used for ftrace direct call, no?
> the changed code is storing/preparing caller's 'ip' address on the
> trampoline's stack so the get_func_ip helper can use it
I've no idea what get_func_ip() helper is...
> currently the trampoline code gets the caller's ip address by reading
> caller's return address from stack and subtracting X86_PATCH_SIZE from
> it
>
> the change uses 'func_addr' as caller's 'ip' address when trampoline is
> generated .. this way we don't need to retrieve the return address from
> stack and care about endbr instruction if IBT is enabled
Ok, I *think* I sorta understand that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-11 9:15 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/6] kprobes: Add new KPROBE_FLAG_ON_FUNC_ENTRY kprobe flag Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16 7:01 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-30 15:08 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 8:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 12:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/6] ftrace: Keep the resolved addr in kallsyms_callback Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16 7:06 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 12:35 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-08 19:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Use given function address for trampoline ip arg Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-08-17 13:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 4/6] bpf: Adjust kprobe_multi entry_ip for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Return value in kprobe get_func_ip only for entry address Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11 9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix get_func_ip offset test for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16 3:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16 7:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16 10:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16 17:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16 17:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16 3:27 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes " Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvpBVDP3FydnAtHA@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox