BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix get_func_ip offset test for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:00:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvtAhPyiWDbTzCdA@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzbXBsL8zrCDEP-+VsKseEQ1fWTRvUkJtwxX5r8q9hf1OA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:25:51PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 2:16 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > With CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT enabled the test for kprobe with offset
> > won't work because of the extra endbr instruction.
> >
> > As suggested by Andrii adding CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT detection
> > and using appropriate offset value based on that.
> >
> > Also removing test7 program, because it does the same as test6.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  .../bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c         | 62 +++++++++++++++----
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c    | 20 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
> > index 938dbd4d7c2f..a4dab2fa2258 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
> > @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
> >  #include <test_progs.h>
> >  #include "get_func_ip_test.skel.h"
> >
> > -void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
> > +static int config_ibt;
> > +
> > +static void test_function_entry(void)
> >  {
> >         struct get_func_ip_test *skel = NULL;
> >         int err, prog_fd;
> > @@ -12,14 +14,6 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
> >         if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "get_func_ip_test__open"))
> >                 return;
> >
> > -       /* test6 is x86_64 specifc because of the instruction
> > -        * offset, disabling it for all other archs
> > -        */
> > -#ifndef __x86_64__
> > -       bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test6, false);
> > -       bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test7, false);
> > -#endif
> > -
> >         err = get_func_ip_test__load(skel);
> >         if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_func_ip_test__load"))
> >                 goto cleanup;
> > @@ -38,16 +32,62 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
> >
> >         ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
> >
> > +       config_ibt = skel->bss->config_ibt;
> 
> skel->bss->config_ibt isn't actually necessary, you can just check
> skel->kconfig->CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT directly. And you won't need to
> trigger BPF program unnecessary, libbpf will fill out kconfig section
> during object/skeleton load phase.

nice, did not know that ;-) will remove it

> 
> > +       ASSERT_TRUE(config_ibt == 0 || config_ibt == 1, "config_ibt");
> 
> you won't need this anymore
> 
> > +       printf("%s:config_ibt %d\n", __func__, config_ibt);
> 
> and this is just debug leftover

it's intentional to find out quickly what config we are failing on

> 
> > +
> >         ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test1_result, 1, "test1_result");
> >         ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test2_result, 1, "test2_result");
> >         ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test3_result, 1, "test3_result");
> >         ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test4_result, 1, "test4_result");
> >         ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test5_result, 1, "test5_result");
> > +
> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
> > index 6db70757bc8b..cb8e58183d46 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/bpf.h>
> >  #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> >  #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> > +#include <stdbool.h>
> >
> >  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> >
> > @@ -13,12 +14,19 @@ extern const void bpf_modify_return_test __ksym;
> >  extern const void bpf_fentry_test6 __ksym;
> >  extern const void bpf_fentry_test7 __ksym;
> >
> > +extern bool CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT __kconfig __weak;
> > +
> > +bool config_ibt;
> > +
> >  __u64 test1_result = 0;
> >  SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
> >  int BPF_PROG(test1, int a)
> >  {
> >         __u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
> >
> > +       /* just to propagate config option value to user space */
> > +       config_ibt = CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT;
> > +
> 
> as mentioned above, you shouldn't need it, just read
> CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT directly through skeleton
> 
> >         test1_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -64,7 +72,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test5, int a, int *b, int ret)
> >  }
> >
> >  __u64 test6_result = 0;
> > -SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test6+0x5")
> > +SEC("?kprobe/")
> 
> don't leave / at the end (and I thought that libbpf rejects this,
> isn't that a case?...), just SEC("?kprobe")

yes, will remove

thanks,
jirka

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-16  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-11  9:15 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/6] kprobes: Add new KPROBE_FLAG_ON_FUNC_ENTRY kprobe flag Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15  9:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:10     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16  7:01         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-30 15:08   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08  8:26     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 12:01   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/6] ftrace: Keep the resolved addr in kallsyms_callback Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 10:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:30     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16  7:06         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-08 12:35   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-08 19:41     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Use given function address for trampoline ip arg Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 10:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-15 10:57     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 12:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17 13:40         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 4/6] bpf: Adjust kprobe_multi entry_ip for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Return value in kprobe get_func_ip only for entry address Jiri Olsa
2022-08-11  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix get_func_ip offset test for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16  3:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16  7:00     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-08-16 10:18       ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-16 17:28         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16 17:19       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-16  3:27 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes " Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvtAhPyiWDbTzCdA@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox