From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
drosen@google.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/10] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 22:03:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231022050335.2579051-7-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231022050335.2579051-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Giving a BTF, the bpf_struct_ops knows the right place to look up type info
associated with a type ID. This enables a user space program to load a
struct_ops object linked to a struct_ops type defined by a module, by
providing the module BTF (fd).
The bpf_prog includes attach_btf in aux which is passed along with the
bpf_attr when loading the program. The purpose of attach_btf is to
determine the btf type of attach_btf_id. The attach_btf_id is then used to
identify the traced function for a trace program. In the case of struct_ops
programs, it is used to identify the struct_ops type of the struct_ops
object that a program is attached to.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 94ec766432f5..5dc4d5fd8ab5 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -579,6 +579,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
u32 prev_insn_idx;
struct bpf_prog *prog; /* eBPF program being verified */
const struct bpf_verifier_ops *ops;
+ struct module *attach_btf_mod; /* The owner module of prog->aux->attach_btf */
struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */
int stack_size; /* number of states to be processed */
bool strict_alignment; /* perform strict pointer alignment checks */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 73b155e52204..b5ef22f65f35 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1390,6 +1390,11 @@ union bpf_attr {
* to using 5 hash functions).
*/
__u64 map_extra;
+
+ __u32 value_type_btf_obj_fd; /* fd pointing to a BTF
+ * type data for
+ * btf_vmlinux_value_type_id.
+ */
};
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_MAP_*_ELEM commands */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 6367d42b2ce1..99ab61cc6cad 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ static void __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(PAGE_SIZE);
}
bpf_map_area_free(st_map->uvalue);
+ btf_put(st_map->st_ops_desc->btf);
bpf_map_area_free(st_map);
}
@@ -735,16 +736,31 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
const struct btf_type *t, *vt;
struct module *mod = NULL;
struct bpf_map *map;
+ struct btf *btf;
int ret;
- st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf_vmlinux, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
- if (!st_ops_desc)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
+ if (attr->value_type_btf_obj_fd) {
+ /* The map holds btf for its whole life time. */
+ btf = btf_get_by_fd(attr->value_type_btf_obj_fd);
+ if (IS_ERR(btf))
+ return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(btf));
+
+ if (btf != btf_vmlinux) {
+ mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+ if (!mod) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto errout;
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ btf = btf_vmlinux;
+ btf_get(btf);
+ }
- if (st_ops_desc->btf != btf_vmlinux) {
- mod = btf_try_get_module(st_ops_desc->btf);
- if (!mod)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
+ if (!st_ops_desc) {
+ ret = -ENOTSUPP;
+ goto errout;
}
vt = st_ops_desc->value_type;
@@ -805,7 +821,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
__bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map);
btf = NULL; /* has been released */
errout:
+ btf_put(btf);
module_put(mod);
+
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 85c1d908f70f..5daf8a2c2bba 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
return ret;
}
-#define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD map_extra
+#define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD value_type_btf_obj_fd
/* called via syscall */
static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7d0cf7289092..0289574bb0d5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -19624,6 +19624,7 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
const struct btf_member *member;
struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
u32 btf_id, member_idx;
+ struct btf *btf;
const char *mname;
if (!prog->gpl_compatible) {
@@ -19631,8 +19632,18 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ btf = prog->aux->attach_btf;
+ if (btf != btf_vmlinux) {
+ /* Make sure st_ops is valid through the lifetime of env */
+ env->attach_btf_mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+ if (!env->attach_btf_mod) {
+ verbose(env, "owner module of btf is not found\n");
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+ }
+
btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
- st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf_vmlinux, btf_id);
+ st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf, btf_id);
if (!st_ops_desc) {
verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u is not a supported struct\n",
btf_id);
@@ -20343,6 +20354,8 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u3
env->prog->expected_attach_type = 0;
*prog = env->prog;
+
+ module_put(env->attach_btf_mod);
err_unlock:
if (!is_priv)
mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock);
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 73b155e52204..b5ef22f65f35 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1390,6 +1390,11 @@ union bpf_attr {
* to using 5 hash functions).
*/
__u64 map_extra;
+
+ __u32 value_type_btf_obj_fd; /* fd pointing to a BTF
+ * type data for
+ * btf_vmlinux_value_type_id.
+ */
};
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_MAP_*_ELEM commands */
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-22 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-22 5:03 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/10] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/10] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/10] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/10] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/10] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-10-26 21:11 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-10-27 4:35 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/10] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2023-10-22 5:03 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/10] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2023-10-22 6:46 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-26 21:02 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-10-27 4:39 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-27 21:32 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-27 22:02 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/10] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/10] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-10-22 5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/10] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-10-22 7:08 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-26 20:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-10-27 4:55 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-27 7:09 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-27 14:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-10-29 2:34 ` Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231022050335.2579051-7-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox