BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, void@manifault.com,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 22:45:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240227204556.17524-6-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227204556.17524-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

When loading struct_ops programs kernel requires BTF id of the
struct_ops type and member index for attachment point inside that
type. This makes it not possible to have same BPF program used in
struct_ops maps that have different struct_ops type.
Check if libbpf rejects such BPF objects files.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 24 +++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |  4 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c      | 17 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 0d8437e05f64..69f5eb9ad546 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -601,6 +601,29 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_bpf_testmod_ops = {
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
+static int bpf_dummy_reg2(void *kdata)
+{
+	struct bpf_testmod_ops2 *ops = kdata;
+
+	ops->test_1();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_testmod_ops2 __bpf_testmod_ops2 = {
+	.test_1 = bpf_testmod_test_1,
+};
+
+struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_testmod_ops2 = {
+	.verifier_ops = &bpf_testmod_verifier_ops,
+	.init = bpf_testmod_ops_init,
+	.init_member = bpf_testmod_ops_init_member,
+	.reg = bpf_dummy_reg2,
+	.unreg = bpf_dummy_unreg,
+	.cfi_stubs = &__bpf_testmod_ops2,
+	.name = "bpf_testmod_ops2",
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
 extern int bpf_fentry_test1(int a);
 
 static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
@@ -612,6 +635,7 @@ static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
 	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
 	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
 	ret = ret ?: register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_bpf_testmod_ops, bpf_testmod_ops);
+	ret = ret ?: register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_testmod_ops2, bpf_testmod_ops2);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 	if (bpf_fentry_test1(0) < 0)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
index c3b0cf788f9f..3183fff7f246 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -37,4 +37,8 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops {
 	int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task);
 };
 
+struct bpf_testmod_ops2 {
+	int (*test_1)(void);
+};
+
 #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9c689db4b05b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "bad_struct_ops.skel.h"
+
+#define EXPECTED_MSG "libbpf: struct_ops reloc"
+
+static libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_cb;
+static bool msg_found;
+
+static int print_cb(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *fmt, va_list args)
+{
+	old_print_cb(level, fmt, args);
+	if (level == LIBBPF_WARN && strncmp(fmt, EXPECTED_MSG, strlen(EXPECTED_MSG)) == 0)
+		msg_found = true;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void test_bad_struct_ops(void)
+{
+	struct bad_struct_ops *skel;
+	int err;
+
+	old_print_cb = libbpf_set_print(print_cb);
+	skel = bad_struct_ops__open_and_load();
+	err = errno;
+	libbpf_set_print(old_print_cb);
+	if (!ASSERT_NULL(skel, "bad_struct_ops__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, EINVAL, "errno should be EINVAL");
+	ASSERT_TRUE(msg_found, "expected message");
+
+	bad_struct_ops__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void serial_test_bad_struct_ops(void)
+{
+	if (test__start_subtest("test_bad_struct_ops"))
+		test_bad_struct_ops();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9c103afbfdb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
+int BPF_PROG(test_1) { return 0; }
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_1 = { .test_1 = (void *)test_1 };
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops2 testmod_2 = { .test_1 = (void *)test_1 };
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-27 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-27 20:45 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 21:47   ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 21:49     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 16:29   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:28     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:30       ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:21       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:37         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28  7:41   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 17:23   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:40     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:50       ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:28   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:31     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:34       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:44   ` David Vernet
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:03   ` David Vernet
2024-02-27 20:45 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-02-28 18:15   ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:06     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 20:11       ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:40   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:44     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:56       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:06         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:29   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 18:34     ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 19:31     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:43   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:55     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29  0:02       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:56         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-01  1:28         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-01 18:03           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-01 18:07             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate " Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 22:55   ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:09     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:16       ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:30         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:40           ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:43             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28  0:12           ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-28  0:50             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28  2:10   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 12:36     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:55     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:04       ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29  0:14         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:25       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29  0:30         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:37           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29  0:40             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: tests for struct_ops autoload/autocreate toggling Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:36   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:10     ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240227204556.17524-6-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox