From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:23:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240228172313.GB148327@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227204556.17524-3-eddyz87@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4178 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:45:50PM +0200, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> Enforce the following existing limitation on struct_ops programs based
> on kernel BTF id instead of program-local BTF id:
>
> struct_ops BPF prog can be re-used between multiple .struct_ops &
> .struct_ops.link as long as it's the same struct_ops struct
> definition and the same function pointer field
Am I correct in understanding the code that the prog also has to be at the same
offset in the new type? So if we have for example:
SEC("struct_ops/test")
int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
struct some_ops___v1 {
int (*test)(void);
};
struct some_ops___v2 {
int (*init)(void);
int (*test)(void);
};
Then this wouldn't work? If so, would it be possible for libbpf to do something
like invisibly duplicate the prog and create a separate one for each struct_ops
map where it's encountered? It feels like a rather awkward restriction to
impose given that the idea behind the feature is to enable loading one of
multiple possible definitions of a struct_ops type.
>
> This allows reusing same BPF program for versioned struct_ops map
> definitions, e.g.:
>
> SEC("struct_ops/test")
> int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
>
> struct some_ops___v1 { int (*test)(void); };
> struct some_ops___v2 { int (*test)(void); };
>
> SEC(".struct_ops.link") struct some_ops___v1 a = { .test = foo }
> SEC(".struct_ops.link") struct some_ops___v2 b = { .test = foo }
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index abe663927013..c239b75d5816 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -1134,8 +1134,27 @@ static int bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops(struct bpf_map *map)
>
> if (mod_btf)
> prog->attach_btf_obj_fd = mod_btf->fd;
> - prog->attach_btf_id = kern_type_id;
> - prog->expected_attach_type = kern_member_idx;
> +
> + /* if we haven't yet processed this BPF program, record proper
> + * attach_btf_id and member_idx
> + */
> + if (!prog->attach_btf_id) {
> + prog->attach_btf_id = kern_type_id;
> + prog->expected_attach_type = kern_member_idx;
> + }
> +
> + /* struct_ops BPF prog can be re-used between multiple
> + * .struct_ops & .struct_ops.link as long as it's the
> + * same struct_ops struct definition and the same
> + * function pointer field
> + */
> + if (prog->attach_btf_id != kern_type_id ||
> + prog->expected_attach_type != kern_member_idx) {
> + pr_warn("struct_ops reloc %s: cannot use prog %s in sec %s with type %u attach_btf_id %u expected_attach_type %u for func ptr %s\n",
> + map->name, prog->name, prog->sec_name, prog->type,
> + prog->attach_btf_id, prog->expected_attach_type, mname);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> st_ops->kern_func_off[i] = kern_data_off + kern_moff;
>
> @@ -9409,27 +9428,6 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_st_ops_relos(struct bpf_object *obj,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - /* if we haven't yet processed this BPF program, record proper
> - * attach_btf_id and member_idx
> - */
> - if (!prog->attach_btf_id) {
> - prog->attach_btf_id = st_ops->type_id;
> - prog->expected_attach_type = member_idx;
> - }
> -
> - /* struct_ops BPF prog can be re-used between multiple
> - * .struct_ops & .struct_ops.link as long as it's the
> - * same struct_ops struct definition and the same
> - * function pointer field
> - */
> - if (prog->attach_btf_id != st_ops->type_id ||
> - prog->expected_attach_type != member_idx) {
> - pr_warn("struct_ops reloc %s: cannot use prog %s in sec %s with type %u attach_btf_id %u expected_attach_type %u for func ptr %s\n",
> - map->name, prog->name, prog->sec_name, prog->type,
> - prog->attach_btf_id, prog->expected_attach_type, name);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> st_ops->progs[member_idx] = prog;
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 20:45 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 21:47 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 21:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 16:29 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:30 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 7:41 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 17:23 ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-02-28 17:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:50 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:44 ` David Vernet
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:03 ` David Vernet
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:15 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 20:11 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:40 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:44 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:29 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 18:34 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 19:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29 0:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:56 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-01 1:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-01 18:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-01 18:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate " Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 22:55 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:09 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:16 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:40 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:43 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 0:12 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-28 0:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 2:10 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 12:36 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:04 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29 0:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29 0:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:37 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29 0:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: tests for struct_ops autoload/autocreate toggling Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:36 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:10 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240228172313.GB148327@maniforge \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox