From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:03:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240228180352.GF148327@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227204556.17524-5-eddyz87@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4238 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:45:52PM +0200, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> Extend struct_ops_module test case to check if it is possible to use
> '___' suffixes for struct_ops type specification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 1 +
> .../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c | 32 +++++++++++++------
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c | 21 +++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> index 66787e99ba1b..0d8437e05f64 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> @@ -555,6 +555,7 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata)
> {
> struct bpf_testmod_ops *ops = kdata;
>
> + ops->test_1();
> /* Some test cases (ex. struct_ops_maybe_null) may not have test_2
> * initialized, so we need to check for NULL.
> */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
> index 8d833f0c7580..7bc80d2755f1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
> @@ -30,12 +30,30 @@ static void check_map_info(struct bpf_map_info *info)
> close(fd);
> }
>
> +static int attach_ops_and_check(struct struct_ops_module *skel,
> + struct bpf_map *map,
> + int expected_test_2_result)
> +{
> + struct bpf_link *link;
> +
> + link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(map);
> + ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_test_mod_1");
> + if (!link)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* test_{1,2}() would be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c */
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_1_result, 0xdeadbeef, "test_1_result");
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, expected_test_2_result, "test_2_result");
> +
> + bpf_link__destroy(link);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void test_struct_ops_load(void)
> {
> DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
> struct struct_ops_module *skel;
> struct bpf_map_info info = {};
> - struct bpf_link *link;
> int err;
> u32 len;
>
> @@ -53,15 +71,11 @@ static void test_struct_ops_load(void)
> if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_get_info_by_fd"))
> goto cleanup;
>
> - link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.testmod_1);
> - ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_test_mod_1");
> -
> - /* test_2() will be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c */
> - ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, 7, "test_2_result");
> -
> - bpf_link__destroy(link);
> -
> check_map_info(&info);
> + if (!attach_ops_and_check(skel, skel->maps.testmod_1, 7))
> + goto cleanup;
> + if (!attach_ops_and_check(skel, skel->maps.testmod_2, 12))
> + goto cleanup;
>
> cleanup:
> struct_ops_module__destroy(skel);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
> index b78746b3cef3..e91426dc51af 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
> @@ -7,12 +7,14 @@
>
> char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>
> +int test_1_result = 0;
> int test_2_result = 0;
>
> SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
> int BPF_PROG(test_1)
> {
> - return 0xdeadbeef;
> + test_1_result = 0xdeadbeef;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> SEC("struct_ops/test_2")
> @@ -27,3 +29,20 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_1 = {
> .test_2 = (void *)test_2,
> };
>
> +SEC("struct_ops/test_2")
> +void BPF_PROG(test_2_v2, int a, int b)
> +{
> + test_2_result = a * b;
> +}
> +
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 {
> + int (*test_1)(void);
> + void (*test_2)(int a, int b);
> + int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task);
> +};
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 testmod_2 = {
> + .test_1 = (void *)test_1,
> + .test_2 = (void *)test_2_v2,
> +};
> --
> 2.43.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 20:45 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 21:47 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 21:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 16:29 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:30 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 7:41 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 17:23 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:50 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:44 ` David Vernet
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:03 ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:15 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 20:11 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:40 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:44 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:29 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 18:34 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 19:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29 0:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:56 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-01 1:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-01 18:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-01 18:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate " Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 22:55 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:09 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:16 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:40 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:43 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 0:12 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-28 0:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 2:10 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 12:36 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:04 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29 0:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29 0:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:37 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29 0:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: tests for struct_ops autoload/autocreate toggling Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:36 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:10 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240228180352.GF148327@maniforge \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox