BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:03:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240228180352.GF148327@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227204556.17524-5-eddyz87@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4238 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:45:52PM +0200, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> Extend struct_ops_module test case to check if it is possible to use
> '___' suffixes for struct_ops type specification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   |  1 +
>  .../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c   | 32 +++++++++++++------
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c   | 21 +++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> index 66787e99ba1b..0d8437e05f64 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> @@ -555,6 +555,7 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_testmod_ops *ops = kdata;
>  
> +	ops->test_1();
>  	/* Some test cases (ex. struct_ops_maybe_null) may not have test_2
>  	 * initialized, so we need to check for NULL.
>  	 */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
> index 8d833f0c7580..7bc80d2755f1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
> @@ -30,12 +30,30 @@ static void check_map_info(struct bpf_map_info *info)
>  	close(fd);
>  }
>  
> +static int attach_ops_and_check(struct struct_ops_module *skel,
> +				struct bpf_map *map,
> +				int expected_test_2_result)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_link *link;
> +
> +	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(map);
> +	ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_test_mod_1");
> +	if (!link)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	/* test_{1,2}() would be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c */
> +	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_1_result, 0xdeadbeef, "test_1_result");
> +	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, expected_test_2_result, "test_2_result");
> +
> +	bpf_link__destroy(link);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void test_struct_ops_load(void)
>  {
>  	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
>  	struct struct_ops_module *skel;
>  	struct bpf_map_info info = {};
> -	struct bpf_link *link;
>  	int err;
>  	u32 len;
>  
> @@ -53,15 +71,11 @@ static void test_struct_ops_load(void)
>  	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_get_info_by_fd"))
>  		goto cleanup;
>  
> -	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.testmod_1);
> -	ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_test_mod_1");
> -
> -	/* test_2() will be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c */
> -	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, 7, "test_2_result");
> -
> -	bpf_link__destroy(link);
> -
>  	check_map_info(&info);
> +	if (!attach_ops_and_check(skel, skel->maps.testmod_1, 7))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	if (!attach_ops_and_check(skel, skel->maps.testmod_2, 12))
> +		goto cleanup;
>  
>  cleanup:
>  	struct_ops_module__destroy(skel);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
> index b78746b3cef3..e91426dc51af 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
> @@ -7,12 +7,14 @@
>  
>  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>  
> +int test_1_result = 0;
>  int test_2_result = 0;
>  
>  SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
>  int BPF_PROG(test_1)
>  {
> -	return 0xdeadbeef;
> +	test_1_result = 0xdeadbeef;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  SEC("struct_ops/test_2")
> @@ -27,3 +29,20 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_1 = {
>  	.test_2 = (void *)test_2,
>  };
>  
> +SEC("struct_ops/test_2")
> +void BPF_PROG(test_2_v2, int a, int b)
> +{
> +	test_2_result = a * b;
> +}
> +
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 {
> +	int (*test_1)(void);
> +	void (*test_2)(int a, int b);
> +	int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task);
> +};
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 testmod_2 = {
> +	.test_1 = (void *)test_1,
> +	.test_2 = (void *)test_2_v2,
> +};
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-28 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-27 20:45 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 21:47   ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 21:49     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 16:29   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:28     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:30       ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:21       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:37         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28  7:41   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 17:23   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:40     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:50       ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:28   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:31     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:34       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:44   ` David Vernet
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:03   ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:15   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:06     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 20:11       ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:40   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:44     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:56       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:06         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:29   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 18:34     ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 19:31     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:43   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:55     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29  0:02       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:56         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-01  1:28         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-01 18:03           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-01 18:07             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate " Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 22:55   ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:09     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:16       ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:30         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:40           ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:43             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28  0:12           ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-28  0:50             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28  2:10   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 12:36     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:55     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:04       ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29  0:14         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:25       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29  0:30         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29  0:37           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29  0:40             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: tests for struct_ops autoload/autocreate toggling Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:36   ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:10     ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240228180352.GF148327@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox