From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, void@manifault.com,
sinquersw@gmail.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/15] selftests/bpf: verify struct_ops autoload/autocreate sync
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 03:19:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240302011920.15302-10-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240302011920.15302-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Check that autocreate flag set to false for struct_ops map causes
autoload flag set to false for corresponding program.
Check that struct_ops program not referenced from any map fails to load.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c | 11 ++++---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c | 14 ++++++++
3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c
index 9f5dbefa0dd9..6a707213e46b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "bad_struct_ops.skel.h"
+#include "bad_struct_ops2.skel.h"
static void invalid_prog_reuse(void)
{
@@ -28,8 +29,39 @@ static void invalid_prog_reuse(void)
bad_struct_ops__destroy(skel);
}
+static void unused_program(void)
+{
+ struct bad_struct_ops2 *skel;
+ char *log = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = bad_struct_ops2__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bad_struct_ops2__open"))
+ return;
+
+ /* struct_ops programs not referenced from any maps are open
+ * with autoload set to true.
+ */
+ ASSERT_TRUE(bpf_program__autoload(skel->progs.foo), "foo autoload == true");
+
+ if (start_libbpf_log_capture())
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = bad_struct_ops2__load(skel);
+ ASSERT_ERR(err, "bad_struct_ops2__load should fail");
+ log = stop_libbpf_log_capture();
+ ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(log, "prog 'foo': failed to load",
+ "message about 'foo' failing to load");
+
+cleanup:
+ free(log);
+ bad_struct_ops2__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_bad_struct_ops(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("invalid_prog_reuse"))
invalid_prog_reuse();
+ if (test__start_subtest("unused_program"))
+ unused_program();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
index c67d0b32b9dc..765b0ec6383a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
@@ -35,18 +35,19 @@ static void cant_load_full_object(void)
static void can_load_partial_object(void)
{
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
struct struct_ops_autocreate *skel;
struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
int err;
- skel = struct_ops_autocreate__open_opts(&opts);
+ skel = struct_ops_autocreate__open();
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_autocreate__open_opts"))
return;
- err = bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test_2, false);
- if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_autoload"))
- goto cleanup;
+ /* struct_ops programs referenced from maps are open with
+ * autoload set to false.
+ */
+ ASSERT_FALSE(bpf_program__autoload(skel->progs.test_1), "test_1 autoload == false");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(bpf_program__autoload(skel->progs.test_2), "test_2 autoload == false");
err = bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.testmod_2, false);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__set_autocreate"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..64a95f6be86d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/* This is an unused struct_ops program, it lacks corresponding
+ * struct_ops map, which provides attachment information.
+ * W/o additional configuration attempt to load such
+ * BPF object file would fail.
+ */
+SEC("struct_ops/foo")
+void foo(void) {}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-02 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-02 1:19 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/15] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/15] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/15] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/15] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/15] selftests/bpf: utility functions to capture libbpf log in test_progs Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/15] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/15] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/15] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate " Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 19:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/15] libbpf: replace elf_state->st_ops_* fields with SEC_ST_OPS sec_type Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/15] libbpf: struct_ops in SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link") Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/15] libbpf: rewrite btf datasec names starting from '?' Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/15] selftests/bpf: test case for SEC("?.struct_ops") Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/15] bpf: allow '?' at the beginning of DATASEC names Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02 1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/15] selftests/bpf: test cases for '?' in BTF names Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240302011920.15302-10-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox