BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, void@manifault.com,
	sinquersw@gmail.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/15] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps
Date: Sat,  2 Mar 2024 03:19:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240302011920.15302-8-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240302011920.15302-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

Check that bpf_map__set_autocreate() can be used to disable automatic
creation for struct_ops maps.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c    | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c         | 42 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c67d0b32b9dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "struct_ops_autocreate.skel.h"
+
+static void cant_load_full_object(void)
+{
+	struct struct_ops_autocreate *skel;
+	char *log;
+	int err;
+
+	skel = struct_ops_autocreate__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_autocreate__open"))
+		return;
+
+	if (start_libbpf_log_capture())
+		goto cleanup;
+	/* The testmod_2 map BTF type (struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2) doesn't
+	 * match the BTF of the actual struct bpf_testmod_ops defined in the
+	 * kernel, so we should fail to load it if we don't disable autocreate
+	 * for that map.
+	 */
+	err = struct_ops_autocreate__load(skel);
+	log = stop_libbpf_log_capture();
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "struct_ops_autocreate__load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(log, "libbpf: struct_ops init_kern", "init_kern message");
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOTSUP, "errno should be ENOTSUP");
+
+cleanup:
+	free(log);
+	struct_ops_autocreate__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void can_load_partial_object(void)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
+	struct struct_ops_autocreate *skel;
+	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+	int err;
+
+	skel = struct_ops_autocreate__open_opts(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_autocreate__open_opts"))
+		return;
+
+	err = bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test_2, false);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_autoload"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	err = bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.testmod_2, false);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__set_autocreate"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	err = struct_ops_autocreate__load(skel);
+	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "struct_ops_autocreate__load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.testmod_1);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* test_1() would be called from bpf_dummy_reg2() in bpf_testmod.c */
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_1_result, 42, "test_1_result");
+
+cleanup:
+	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	struct_ops_autocreate__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_struct_ops_autocreate(void)
+{
+	if (test__start_subtest("cant_load_full_object"))
+		cant_load_full_object();
+	if (test__start_subtest("can_load_partial_object"))
+		can_load_partial_object();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..294d48bb8e3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+int test_1_result = 0;
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
+int BPF_PROG(test_1)
+{
+	test_1_result = 42;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
+int BPF_PROG(test_2)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 {
+	int (*test_1)(void);
+};
+
+struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 {
+	int (*test_1)(void);
+	int (*does_not_exist)(void);
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 testmod_1 = {
+	.test_1 = (void *)test_1
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 testmod_2 = {
+	.test_1 = (void *)test_1,
+	.does_not_exist = (void *)test_2
+};
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-02  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-02  1:19 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/15] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/15] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/15] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/15] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/15] selftests/bpf: utility functions to capture libbpf log in test_progs Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/15] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/15] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 19:13   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/15] selftests/bpf: verify struct_ops autoload/autocreate sync Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/15] libbpf: replace elf_state->st_ops_* fields with SEC_ST_OPS sec_type Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/15] libbpf: struct_ops in SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link") Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/15] libbpf: rewrite btf datasec names starting from '?' Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/15] selftests/bpf: test case for SEC("?.struct_ops") Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/15] bpf: allow '?' at the beginning of DATASEC names Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/15] selftests/bpf: test cases for '?' in BTF names Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240302011920.15302-8-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox