From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] bpf: Mark each subprog with proper pstack states
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:45:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240926234521.1770481-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240926234506.1769256-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Three private stack states are used to direct jit action:
PSTACK_TREE_NO: do not use private stack
PSTACK_TREE_INTERNAL: adjust frame pointer address (similar to normal stack)
PSTACK_TREE_ROOT: set the frame pointer
Note that for subtree root, even if the root bpf_prog stack size is 0,
PSTACK_TREE_INTERNAL is still used. This is for bpf exception handling.
More details can be found in subsequent jit support and selftest patches.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/bpf/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 156b9516d9f6..8f02d11bd408 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1550,6 +1550,12 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
};
};
+enum bpf_pstack_state {
+ PSTACK_TREE_NO,
+ PSTACK_TREE_INTERNAL,
+ PSTACK_TREE_ROOT,
+};
+
struct bpf_prog {
u16 pages; /* Number of allocated pages */
u16 jited:1, /* Is our filter JIT'ed? */
@@ -1570,15 +1576,18 @@ struct bpf_prog {
pstack_eligible:1; /* Candidate for private stacks */
enum bpf_prog_type type; /* Type of BPF program */
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type; /* For some prog types */
+ enum bpf_pstack_state pstack:2; /* Private stack state */
u32 len; /* Number of filter blocks */
u32 jited_len; /* Size of jited insns in bytes */
u8 tag[BPF_TAG_SIZE];
+ u16 subtree_stack_depth; /* Subtree stack depth if PSTACK_TREE_ROOT prog, 0 otherwise */
struct bpf_prog_stats __percpu *stats;
int __percpu *active;
unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const void *ctx,
const struct bpf_insn *insn);
struct bpf_prog_aux *aux; /* Auxiliary fields */
struct sock_fprog_kern *orig_prog; /* Original BPF program */
+ void __percpu *private_stack_ptr;
/* Instructions for interpreter */
union {
DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct sock_filter, insns);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 0727fff6de0e..d6eb052f6631 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1239,6 +1239,7 @@ void __weak bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
struct bpf_binary_header *hdr = bpf_jit_binary_hdr(fp);
bpf_jit_binary_free(hdr);
+ free_percpu(fp->private_stack_ptr);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off(fp));
}
@@ -2420,6 +2421,24 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err)
if (*err)
return fp;
+ if (fp->pstack_eligible) {
+ if (!fp->aux->stack_depth) {
+ fp->pstack = PSTACK_TREE_NO;
+ } else {
+ void __percpu *private_stack_ptr;
+
+ fp->pstack = PSTACK_TREE_ROOT;
+ private_stack_ptr =
+ __alloc_percpu_gfp(fp->aux->stack_depth, 8, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!private_stack_ptr) {
+ *err = -ENOMEM;
+ return fp;
+ }
+ fp->subtree_stack_depth = fp->aux->stack_depth;
+ fp->private_stack_ptr = private_stack_ptr;
+ }
+ }
+
fp = bpf_int_jit_compile(fp);
bpf_prog_jit_attempt_done(fp);
if (!fp->jited && jit_needed) {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 69e17cb22037..9d093e2013ca 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20060,6 +20060,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog, **func, *tmp;
int i, j, subprog_start, subprog_end = 0, len, subprog;
+ int subtree_top_idx, subtree_stack_depth;
struct bpf_map *map_ptr;
struct bpf_insn *insn;
void *old_bpf_func;
@@ -20138,6 +20139,35 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
func[i]->is_func = 1;
func[i]->sleepable = prog->sleepable;
func[i]->aux->func_idx = i;
+
+ subtree_top_idx = env->subprog_info[i].subtree_top_idx;
+ if (env->subprog_info[subtree_top_idx].pstack_eligible) {
+ if (subtree_top_idx == i)
+ func[i]->subtree_stack_depth =
+ env->subprog_info[i].subtree_stack_depth;
+
+ subtree_stack_depth = func[i]->subtree_stack_depth;
+ if (subtree_top_idx != i) {
+ if (env->subprog_info[subtree_top_idx].subtree_stack_depth)
+ func[i]->pstack = PSTACK_TREE_INTERNAL;
+ else
+ func[i]->pstack = PSTACK_TREE_NO;
+ } else if (!subtree_stack_depth) {
+ func[i]->pstack = PSTACK_TREE_INTERNAL;
+ } else {
+ void __percpu *private_stack_ptr;
+
+ func[i]->pstack = PSTACK_TREE_ROOT;
+ private_stack_ptr =
+ __alloc_percpu_gfp(subtree_stack_depth, 8, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!private_stack_ptr) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_free;
+ }
+ func[i]->private_stack_ptr = private_stack_ptr;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Below members will be freed only at prog->aux */
func[i]->aux->btf = prog->aux->btf;
func[i]->aux->func_info = prog->aux->func_info;
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-26 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-26 23:45 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/5] bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs Yonghong Song
2024-09-26 23:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Allow each subprog having stack size of 512 bytes Yonghong Song
2024-09-26 23:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/5] bpf: Collect stack depth information Yonghong Song
2024-09-30 14:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-30 16:23 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-26 23:45 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-09-30 14:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] bpf: Mark each subprog with proper pstack states Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-30 16:26 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-26 23:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/5] bpf, x86: Add jit support for private stack Yonghong Song
2024-09-27 4:58 ` Leon Hwang
2024-09-27 15:24 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-29 8:31 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-30 16:29 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-29 13:02 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-30 16:31 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-29 13:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-30 15:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-30 16:33 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-01 4:31 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-01 4:37 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-01 18:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-01 19:53 ` yet another approach Was: " Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-01 20:50 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-01 21:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-02 0:22 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-02 1:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-02 2:16 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-02 6:28 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-02 6:48 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-03 6:17 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-03 13:39 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-03 17:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-03 18:53 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-03 20:44 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-03 20:47 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-03 20:54 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-03 22:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-04 5:22 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-04 19:27 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-04 19:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-05 2:03 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-08 22:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-09 2:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-09 6:31 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-09 14:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-09 15:56 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-09 16:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-09 16:38 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-09 17:37 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-10-09 6:12 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-26 23:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add private stack tests Yonghong Song
2024-09-30 13:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-30 15:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-30 16:35 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240926234521.1770481-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox