From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:33:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250319133309.6fce6404@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3434 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7,
from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:630,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
from include/linux/preempt.h:79,
from include/linux/smp.h:116,
from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:16:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h: In function 'decode_tail':
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:219:45: error: initialization from pointer to non-enclosed address space
219 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:237:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr'
237 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h:67:16: note: in expansion of macro 'per_cpu_ptr'
67 | return per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[idx].mcs, cpu);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:219:45: note: expected 'const __seg_gs void *' but pointer is of type 'struct mcs_spinlock *'
219 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:237:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr'
237 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h:67:16: note: in expansion of macro 'per_cpu_ptr'
67 | return per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[idx].mcs, cpu);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c: In function 'native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath':
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:285:41: error: passing argument 2 of 'decode_tail' from pointer to non-enclosed address space
285 | prev = decode_tail(old, qnodes);
| ^~~~~~
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:30:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h:62:79: note: expected 'struct qnode *' but argument is of type '__seg_gs struct qnode *'
62 | static inline __pure struct mcs_spinlock *decode_tail(u32 tail, struct qnode *qnodes)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:401:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c: In function '__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath':
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:285:41: error: passing argument 2 of 'decode_tail' from pointer to non-enclosed address space
285 | prev = decode_tail(old, qnodes);
| ^~~~~~
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h:62:79: note: expected 'struct qnode *' but argument is of type '__seg_gs struct qnode *'
62 | static inline __pure struct mcs_spinlock *decode_tail(u32 tail, struct qnode *qnodes)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
Caused by the resilient-queued-spin-lock branch of the bpf-next tree
interacting with the "Enable strict percpu address space checks" series
form the mm-stable tree.
I don't know why this happens, but reverting that branch inf the bpf-next
tree makes the failure go away, so I have done that for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-19 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-19 2:33 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-03-19 2:46 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-19 3:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-19 13:37 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-19 13:43 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-19 14:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-19 14:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-19 15:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-19 16:06 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-19 18:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-19 19:43 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-19 23:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-20 7:49 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-20 23:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-21 7:15 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-19 5:03 ` Uros Bizjak
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-27 13:26 Thierry Reding
2026-04-27 13:34 ` Thierry Reding
2026-04-27 13:43 ` Alan Maguire
2026-04-28 18:26 ` sashiko-bot
2025-03-12 3:52 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-16 6:05 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-16 16:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-16 18:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 19:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-13 3:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-13 4:00 ` Al Viro
2024-09-13 4:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-13 4:43 ` Al Viro
2024-09-15 23:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-13 3:45 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-13 3:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-15 23:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-13 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-15 23:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-14 1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-14 1:41 ` Al Viro
2024-08-14 2:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-14 14:50 ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-30 1:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-14 1:18 Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-17 18:15 Mark Brown
2024-06-22 8:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-22 8:28 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-25 1:22 ` Thinker Li
2024-06-25 15:54 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-06-25 16:03 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-25 17:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-06-27 7:14 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-07-09 23:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-18 1:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-18 7:42 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2023-03-19 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-20 12:07 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-03-21 22:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-20 1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-20 3:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-20 3:44 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-04-19 1:56 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-21 0:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-21 9:45 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-04-21 10:40 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-02-09 0:21 Stephen Rothwell
[not found] <20190418115748.0b0aefdc@canb.auug.org.au>
2019-04-18 5:55 ` Magnus Karlsson
2019-04-18 6:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-18 6:25 ` Magnus Karlsson
2019-04-18 6:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-18 7:12 ` Magnus Karlsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250319133309.6fce6404@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox