BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:33:09 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250319133309.6fce6404@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3434 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7,
                 from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:630,
                 from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
                 from include/linux/preempt.h:79,
                 from include/linux/smp.h:116,
                 from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:16:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h: In function 'decode_tail':
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:219:45: error: initialization from pointer to non-enclosed address space
  219 |         const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL;    \
      |                                             ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:237:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr'
  237 |         __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr);                                         \
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h:67:16: note: in expansion of macro 'per_cpu_ptr'
   67 |         return per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[idx].mcs, cpu);
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:219:45: note: expected 'const __seg_gs void *' but pointer is of type 'struct mcs_spinlock *'
  219 |         const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL;    \
      |                                             ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:237:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr'
  237 |         __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr);                                         \
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h:67:16: note: in expansion of macro 'per_cpu_ptr'
   67 |         return per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[idx].mcs, cpu);
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c: In function 'native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath':
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:285:41: error: passing argument 2 of 'decode_tail' from pointer to non-enclosed address space
  285 |                 prev = decode_tail(old, qnodes);
      |                                         ^~~~~~
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:30:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h:62:79: note: expected 'struct qnode *' but argument is of type '__seg_gs struct qnode *'
   62 | static inline __pure struct mcs_spinlock *decode_tail(u32 tail, struct qnode *qnodes)
      |                                                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:401:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c: In function '__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath':
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:285:41: error: passing argument 2 of 'decode_tail' from pointer to non-enclosed address space
  285 |                 prev = decode_tail(old, qnodes);
      |                                         ^~~~~~
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h:62:79: note: expected 'struct qnode *' but argument is of type '__seg_gs struct qnode *'
   62 | static inline __pure struct mcs_spinlock *decode_tail(u32 tail, struct qnode *qnodes)
      |                                                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~

Caused by the resilient-queued-spin-lock branch of the bpf-next tree
interacting with the "Enable strict percpu address space checks" series
form the mm-stable tree.

I don't know why this happens, but reverting that branch inf the bpf-next
tree makes the failure go away, so I have done that for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19  2:33 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-03-19  2:46 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-19  3:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-19 13:37   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-19 13:43     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-19 14:36       ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-19 14:55         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-19 15:11           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-19 16:06           ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-19 18:56             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-19 19:43               ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-19 23:16                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-20  7:49                   ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-20 23:17                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-21  7:15                       ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-19  5:03 ` Uros Bizjak
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-27 13:26 Thierry Reding
2026-04-27 13:34 ` Thierry Reding
2026-04-27 13:43 ` Alan Maguire
2026-04-28 18:26 ` sashiko-bot
2025-03-12  3:52 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-16  6:05 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-16 16:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-16 18:35   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 19:32     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-13  3:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-13  4:00 ` Al Viro
2024-09-13  4:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-13  4:43     ` Al Viro
2024-09-15 23:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-13  3:45 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-13  3:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-15 23:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-13  3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-15 23:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-14  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-14  1:41 ` Al Viro
2024-08-14  2:37   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-14 14:50   ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-30  1:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-14  1:18 Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-17 18:15 Mark Brown
2024-06-22  8:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-22  8:28 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-25  1:22 ` Thinker Li
2024-06-25 15:54   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-06-25 16:03     ` Mark Brown
2024-06-25 17:14     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-06-27  7:14       ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-07-09 23:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-18  1:49   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-18  7:42     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2023-03-19 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-20 12:07 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-03-21 22:35   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-20  1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-20  3:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-20  3:44   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-04-19  1:56 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-21  0:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-21  9:45   ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-04-21 10:40     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-02-09  0:21 Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] <20190418115748.0b0aefdc@canb.auug.org.au>
2019-04-18  5:55 ` Magnus Karlsson
2019-04-18  6:18   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-18  6:25     ` Magnus Karlsson
2019-04-18  6:51       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-18  7:12         ` Magnus Karlsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250319133309.6fce6404@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox