From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 03/18] bpf: Refactor record_call_access() to extract per-arg logic
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:14:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260424171449.2035279-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424171433.2034470-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Extract the per-argument FP-derived pointer handling from
record_call_access() into a new record_arg_access() helper.
The existing loop body — checking arg_is_fp, querying stack access
bytes, and calling record_stack_access/record_imprecise — will be
reused for stack argument slots in the next patch. Factoring it out
now avoids duplicating the logic.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/liveness.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/liveness.c b/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
index 332e6e003f27..1b45621d652c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,44 @@ static int record_load_store_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return 0;
}
+static int record_arg_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct func_instance *instance,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ struct arg_track *at, int arg_idx,
+ int insn_idx)
+{
+ int depth = instance->depth;
+ int frame = at->frame;
+ s64 bytes;
+ int err;
+
+ if (!arg_is_fp(at))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (bpf_helper_call(insn)) {
+ bytes = bpf_helper_stack_access_bytes(env, insn, arg_idx, insn_idx);
+ } else if (bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(insn)) {
+ bytes = bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(env, insn, arg_idx, insn_idx);
+ } else {
+ for (int f = 0; f <= depth; f++) {
+ err = mark_stack_read(instance, f, insn_idx, SPIS_ALL);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return 1;
+ }
+ if (bytes == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (frame >= 0 && frame <= depth)
+ err = record_stack_access(instance, at, bytes, frame, insn_idx);
+ else if (frame == ARG_IMPRECISE)
+ err = record_imprecise(instance, at->mask, insn_idx);
+ else
+ err = 0;
+ return err;
+}
+
/* Record stack access for a given 'at' state of helper/kfunc 'insn' */
static int record_call_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct func_instance *instance,
@@ -1350,9 +1388,8 @@ static int record_call_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
int insn_idx)
{
struct bpf_insn *insn = &env->prog->insnsi[insn_idx];
- int depth = instance->depth;
struct bpf_call_summary cs;
- int r, err = 0, num_params = 5;
+ int r, err, num_params = 5;
if (bpf_pseudo_call(insn))
return 0;
@@ -1361,33 +1398,9 @@ static int record_call_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
num_params = cs.num_params;
for (r = BPF_REG_1; r < BPF_REG_1 + num_params; r++) {
- int frame = at[r].frame;
- s64 bytes;
-
- if (!arg_is_fp(&at[r]))
- continue;
-
- if (bpf_helper_call(insn)) {
- bytes = bpf_helper_stack_access_bytes(env, insn, r - 1, insn_idx);
- } else if (bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(insn)) {
- bytes = bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(env, insn, r - 1, insn_idx);
- } else {
- for (int f = 0; f <= depth; f++) {
- err = mark_stack_read(instance, f, insn_idx, SPIS_ALL);
- if (err)
- return err;
- }
- return 0;
- }
- if (bytes == 0)
- continue;
-
- if (frame >= 0 && frame <= depth)
- err = record_stack_access(instance, &at[r], bytes, frame, insn_idx);
- else if (frame == ARG_IMPRECISE)
- err = record_imprecise(instance, at[r].mask, insn_idx);
+ err = record_arg_access(env, instance, insn, &at[r], r - 1, insn_idx);
if (err)
- return err;
+ return err > 0 ? 0 : err;
}
return 0;
}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 17:14 [PATCH bpf-next 00/18] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/18] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25 5:09 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-27 20:40 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-28 14:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-28 16:47 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-28 23:50 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-29 0:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/18] bpf: Add precision marking and backtracking for stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25 5:10 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-28 16:46 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-28 20:54 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:14 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-04-29 0:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/18] bpf: Refactor record_call_access() to extract per-arg logic Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/18] bpf: Extend liveness analysis to track stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25 5:11 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/18] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/18] bpf: Prepare architecture JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25 5:17 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/18] bpf: Enable r11 based insns Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/18] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25 5:19 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/18] bpf: Reject stack arguments if tail call reachable Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/18] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25 5:29 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/18] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/18] selftests/bpf: Add tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/18] selftests/bpf: Add verifier " Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25 5:33 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/18] selftests/bpf: Add BTF fixup for __naked subprog parameter names Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/18] selftests/bpf: Add precision backtracking test for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/18] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7 Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/18] bpf, arm64: Add JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-27 9:06 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-27 20:42 ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/18] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64 Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260424171449.2035279-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox