public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 14/18] selftests/bpf: Add BTF fixup for __naked subprog parameter names
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:17:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260424171708.2055872-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424171433.2034470-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

When __naked subprogs are used in verifier tests, clang drops
parameter names from their BTF FUNC_PROTO entries. This prevents
the verifier from resolving stack argument slots by name.

Add a __btf_func_path(path) annotation that points to a separate
BTF file containing properly-named FUNC entries. The test_loader
matches FUNC entries by name, detects anonymous parameters, and
replaces the FUNC_PROTO with a new one that carries parameter
names from the custom file while preserving the original type IDs.

The custom BTF file also serves as btf_custom_path for kfunc
resolution when no separate btf_custom_path is specified.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c    | 136 ++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
index dcd78a3a9052..a9f58900a501 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@
 #define __auxiliary		__test_tag("test_auxiliary")
 #define __auxiliary_unpriv	__test_tag("test_auxiliary_unpriv")
 #define __btf_path(path)	__test_tag("test_btf_path=" path)
+#define __btf_func_path(path)	__test_tag("test_btf_func_path=" path)
 #define __arch(arch)		__test_tag("test_arch=" arch)
 #define __arch_x86_64		__arch("X86_64")
 #define __arch_arm64		__arch("ARM64")
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index c4c34cae6102..b9e21696b9ba 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct test_spec {
 	struct test_subspec priv;
 	struct test_subspec unpriv;
 	const char *btf_custom_path;
+	const char *btf_custom_func_path;
 	int log_level;
 	int prog_flags;
 	int mode_mask;
@@ -590,6 +591,8 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
 			jit_on_next_line = true;
 		} else if ((val = str_has_pfx(s, "test_btf_path="))) {
 			spec->btf_custom_path = val;
+		} else if ((val = str_has_pfx(s, "test_btf_func_path="))) {
+			spec->btf_custom_func_path = val;
 		} else if ((val = str_has_pfx(s, "test_caps_unpriv="))) {
 			err = parse_caps(val, &spec->unpriv.caps, "test caps");
 			if (err)
@@ -1138,6 +1141,123 @@ static int get_stream(int stream_id, int prog_fd, char *text, size_t text_sz)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Fix up the program's BTF using BTF from a separate file.
+ *
+ * For __naked subprogs, clang drops parameter names from BTF. Find FUNC
+ * entries with anonymous parameters and replace their FUNC_PROTO with the
+ * properly-named version from the custom file.
+ */
+static int fixup_btf_from_path(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
+{
+	struct btf *prog_btf, *custom_btf;
+	__u32 i, j, cnt, custom_cnt;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	prog_btf = bpf_object__btf(obj);
+	if (!prog_btf)
+		return 0;
+
+	custom_btf = btf__parse(path, NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(custom_btf, "parse_custom_btf"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	cnt = btf__type_cnt(prog_btf);
+	custom_cnt = btf__type_cnt(custom_btf);
+
+	/* Fix up FUNC entries with anonymous params.
+	 * Save all data from prog_btf BEFORE calling btf__add_*,
+	 * since those calls may reallocate the BTF data buffer
+	 * and invalidate any pointers obtained from btf__type_by_id.
+	 */
+	for (i = 1; i < cnt; i++) {
+		const struct btf_type *t = btf__type_by_id(prog_btf, i);
+		const struct btf_type *fp, *custom_t, *custom_fp;
+		const struct btf_param *params, *custom_params;
+		__u32 ret_type_id, vlen;
+		__u32 *prog_param_types = NULL;
+		const char *name;
+		int new_proto_id;
+
+		if (!btf_is_func(t))
+			continue;
+
+		fp = btf__type_by_id(prog_btf, t->type);
+		if (!fp || !btf_is_func_proto(fp) || btf_vlen(fp) == 0)
+			continue;
+
+		/* Check if any param is anonymous */
+		params = btf_params(fp);
+		if (params[0].name_off != 0)
+			continue;
+
+		/* Find matching FUNC by name in custom BTF */
+		name = btf__name_by_offset(prog_btf, t->name_off);
+		if (!name)
+			continue;
+
+		for (j = 1; j < custom_cnt; j++) {
+			const char *cname;
+
+			custom_t = btf__type_by_id(custom_btf, j);
+			if (!btf_is_func(custom_t))
+				continue;
+			cname = btf__name_by_offset(custom_btf, custom_t->name_off);
+			if (cname && strcmp(name, cname) == 0)
+				break;
+		}
+		if (j >= custom_cnt)
+			continue;
+
+		custom_fp = btf__type_by_id(custom_btf, custom_t->type);
+		if (!custom_fp || !btf_is_func_proto(custom_fp))
+			continue;
+
+		vlen = btf_vlen(fp);
+		if (vlen != btf_vlen(custom_fp))
+			continue;
+
+		/* Save data before btf__add_* calls invalidate pointers */
+		ret_type_id = fp->type;
+		prog_param_types = malloc(vlen * sizeof(*prog_param_types));
+		if (!prog_param_types) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			break;
+		}
+		for (j = 0; j < vlen; j++)
+			prog_param_types[j] = params[j].type;
+
+		/* Add a new FUNC_PROTO: param names from custom, types from prog */
+		new_proto_id = btf__add_func_proto(prog_btf, ret_type_id);
+		if (new_proto_id < 0) {
+			err = new_proto_id;
+			free(prog_param_types);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		custom_params = btf_params(custom_fp);
+		for (j = 0; j < vlen; j++) {
+			const char *pname;
+
+			pname = btf__name_by_offset(custom_btf, custom_params[j].name_off);
+			err = btf__add_func_param(prog_btf, pname ?: "", prog_param_types[j]);
+			if (err)
+				break;
+		}
+		free(prog_param_types);
+		if (err)
+			break;
+
+		/* Update the FUNC to point to the new FUNC_PROTO (re-fetch
+		 * since btf__add_* may have reallocated the data buffer).
+		 */
+		((struct btf_type *)btf__type_by_id(prog_btf, i))->type = new_proto_id;
+	}
+
+	btf__free(custom_btf);
+	return err;
+}
+
 /* this function is forced noinline and has short generic name to look better
  * in test_progs output (in case of a failure)
  */
@@ -1194,13 +1314,27 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Implicitly reset to NULL if next test case doesn't specify */
+	/* Implicitly reset to NULL if next test case doesn't specify.
+	 * btf_custom_func_path also serves as btf_custom_path for kfunc resolution.
+	 */
 	open_opts->btf_custom_path = spec->btf_custom_path;
+	if (!open_opts->btf_custom_path)
+		open_opts->btf_custom_path = spec->btf_custom_func_path;
 
 	tobj = bpf_object__open_mem(obj_bytes, obj_byte_cnt, open_opts);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tobj, "obj_open_mem")) /* shouldn't happen */
 		goto subtest_cleanup;
 
+	/* Fix up __naked subprog BTF using a separate file with named params */
+	if (spec->btf_custom_func_path) {
+		err = fixup_btf_from_path(tobj, spec->btf_custom_func_path);
+		if (err) {
+			PRINT_FAIL("failed to fixup BTF from %s: %d\n",
+				   spec->btf_custom_func_path, err);
+			goto subtest_cleanup;
+		}
+	}
+
 	i = 0;
 	bpf_object__for_each_program(tprog_iter, tobj) {
 		spec_iter = &specs[i++];
-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-24 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-24 17:14 [PATCH bpf-next 00/18] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/18] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25  5:09     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-27 20:40       ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-28 14:29   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-28 16:47     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/18] bpf: Add precision marking and backtracking for stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25  5:10     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-28 16:46   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/18] bpf: Refactor record_call_access() to extract per-arg logic Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/18] bpf: Extend liveness analysis to track stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25  5:11     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/18] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/18] bpf: Prepare architecture JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25  5:17     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/18] bpf: Enable r11 based insns Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/18] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25  5:19     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/18] bpf: Reject stack arguments if tail call reachable Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-24 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/18] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25  5:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/18] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/18] selftests/bpf: Add tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/18] selftests/bpf: Add verifier " Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-25  5:33     ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/18] selftests/bpf: Add precision backtracking test for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/18] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7 Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/18] bpf, arm64: Add JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 18:00   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-27  9:06     ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-27 20:42       ` Yonghong Song
2026-04-24 17:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/18] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64 Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260424171708.2055872-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox