From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Add support to specify uprobe_multi target via file descriptor
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:36:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610143627.804790-3-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610143627.804790-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Allow uprobe_multi link to identify the target binary by an already
opened file descriptor.
Adding new BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_PATH_FD flag and the path_fd field for
the attr.link_create.uprobe_multi struct.
When the flag is set, we resolve the target from path_fd, without the
flag, we keep the existing string path behavior.
I don't see a use case for supporting O_PATH file descriptors, because
we need to read the binary first to get probes offsets, so I'm using
the CLASS(fd, f), which fails for O_PATH fds.
Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.4
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 7 +++++-
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 ++--
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 7 +++++-
4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 11dd610fa5fa..89b36de5fdbb 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1327,7 +1327,11 @@ enum {
* BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI attach type to create return probe.
*/
enum {
- BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN = (1U << 0)
+ /* Get return uprobe. */
+ BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN = (1U << 0),
+
+ /* Get path from provided path_fd. */
+ BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_PATH_FD = (1U << 1),
};
/* link_create.netfilter.flags used in LINK_CREATE command for
@@ -1864,6 +1868,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
__u32 cnt;
__u32 flags;
__u32 pid;
+ __u32 path_fd;
} uprobe_multi;
struct {
union {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index d4188a992bd8..cef9bd6316a5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3475,7 +3475,7 @@ static void bpf_link_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *filp)
seq_printf(m, "link_type:\t%s\n", link->flags == BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN ?
"kretprobe_multi" : "kprobe_multi");
else if (link->type == BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI)
- seq_printf(m, "link_type:\t%s\n", link->flags == BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN ?
+ seq_printf(m, "link_type:\t%s\n", link->flags & BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN ?
"uretprobe_multi" : "uprobe_multi");
else
seq_printf(m, "link_type:\t%s\n", bpf_link_type_strs[type]);
@@ -5835,7 +5835,7 @@ static int bpf_map_do_batch(const union bpf_attr *attr,
return err;
}
-#define BPF_LINK_CREATE_LAST_FIELD link_create.uprobe_multi.pid
+#define BPF_LINK_CREATE_LAST_FIELD link_create.uprobe_multi.path_fd
static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
{
struct bpf_prog *prog;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 970ce7bbf99e..f5d68f6d90f3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <linux/key.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
+#include <linux/file.h>
#include <net/bpf_sk_storage.h>
@@ -3214,6 +3215,38 @@ static u64 bpf_uprobe_multi_cookie(struct bpf_run_ctx *ctx)
return run_ctx->uprobe->cookie;
}
+static int bpf_uprobe_multi_get_path(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct path *path)
+{
+ void __user *upath = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.path);
+ u32 path_fd = attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.path_fd;
+ u32 flags = attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.flags;
+
+ if (flags & BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_PATH_FD) {
+ /*
+ * When BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_PATH_FD is set, the executable is
+ * identified by path_fd, upath must be NULL.
+ */
+ if (upath)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ CLASS(fd, f)(path_fd);
+ if (fd_empty(f))
+ return -EBADF;
+ *path = fd_file(f)->f_path;
+ path_get(path);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_PATH_FD is not set, the path is resolved
+ * relative to the cwd (AT_FDCWD) or absolute using the upath string.
+ */
+ if (!upath || path_fd)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return user_path_at(AT_FDCWD, upath, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, path);
+}
+
int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link *link = NULL;
@@ -3223,7 +3256,6 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
struct task_struct *task = NULL;
unsigned long __user *uoffsets;
u64 __user *ucookies;
- void __user *upath;
u32 flags, cnt, i;
struct path path;
pid_t pid;
@@ -3240,19 +3272,18 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
return -EINVAL;
flags = attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.flags;
- if (flags & ~BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN)
+ if (flags & ~(BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN | BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_PATH_FD))
return -EINVAL;
/*
- * path, offsets and cnt are mandatory,
+ * offsets and cnt are mandatory,
* ref_ctr_offsets and cookies are optional
*/
- upath = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.path);
uoffsets = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.offsets);
cnt = attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.cnt;
pid = attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.pid;
- if (!upath || !uoffsets || !cnt || pid < 0)
+ if (!uoffsets || !cnt || pid < 0)
return -EINVAL;
if (cnt > MAX_UPROBE_MULTI_CNT)
return -E2BIG;
@@ -3260,7 +3291,7 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
uref_ctr_offsets = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.ref_ctr_offsets);
ucookies = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.cookies);
- err = user_path_at(AT_FDCWD, upath, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &path);
+ err = bpf_uprobe_multi_get_path(attr, &path);
if (err)
return err;
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 11dd610fa5fa..89b36de5fdbb 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1327,7 +1327,11 @@ enum {
* BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI attach type to create return probe.
*/
enum {
- BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN = (1U << 0)
+ /* Get return uprobe. */
+ BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN = (1U << 0),
+
+ /* Get path from provided path_fd. */
+ BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_PATH_FD = (1U << 1),
};
/* link_create.netfilter.flags used in LINK_CREATE command for
@@ -1864,6 +1868,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
__u32 cnt;
__u32 flags;
__u32 pid;
+ __u32 path_fd;
} uprobe_multi;
struct {
union {
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 14:36 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Allow uprobe_multi binary specified by file descriptor Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:36 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/6] bpf: Use user_path_at for path resolution in uprobe_multi Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 9:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:36 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-06-10 15:51 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Add support to specify uprobe_multi target via file descriptor bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-11 9:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:36 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/6] libbpf: Add path_fd to struct bpf_link_create_opts Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 9:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:36 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi path_fd test Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 9:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:36 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi path_fd fail tests Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 9:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 14:36 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix typo in verify_umulti_link_info Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610143627.804790-3-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox