BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2
Date: Wed,  8 Jul 2026 13:09:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708200949.2156169-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708200939.2153664-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

LLVM 23 added support for returning a value in two registers for an
__int128, or a struct/union whose size is greater than 8 but not more
than 16 bytes. See LLVM patches [1] and [2].

Before LLVM 23 the BPF backend could not return these values at all. A
by-value struct or union return (of any size) was rejected at compile
time with:

  error: aggregate returns are not supported

and an __int128 return failed later in the backend with:

  fatal error: error in backend: unable to allocate function return #1

Both are resolved in LLVM 23, which lowers such returns into the R0:R2
register pair.

This patch is one of several preparation patches that build up
<=16 byte return support incrementally:
  - the verifier R0:R2 modelling in this patch,
  - the x86 JIT move and JIT-capability gate,
  - precision-backtracking and live-register tracking of R2,
  - forcing the JIT for such programs, and
  - guarding the trampoline paths.
Finally, the patch "bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types" enables
support for 16-byte returns.

This patch adds handling for '>8' byte returns in several places: BPF
subprogram returns (the main program, and both global and static
subprograms) and kfunc returns.

  [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190894
  [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206876

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3f34ce1a3107..03ffb5f839fa 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -424,6 +424,35 @@ static bool subprog_returns_void(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
 	return btf_type_is_void(type);
 }
 
+static bool bpf_ret_reg_pair(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
+{
+	const struct btf_type *type, *func, *func_proto;
+	const struct btf *btf = env->prog->aux->btf;
+	u32 btf_id;
+
+	if (!btf || !env->prog->aux->func_info)
+		return false;
+
+	btf_id = env->prog->aux->func_info[subprog].type_id;
+
+	func = btf_type_by_id(btf, btf_id);
+	if (!func)
+		return false;
+
+	func_proto = btf_type_by_id(btf, func->type);
+	if (!func_proto)
+		return false;
+
+	type = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, func_proto->type, NULL);
+	if (!type)
+		return false;
+
+	if (btf_type_is_struct(type) || btf_type_is_scalar(type))
+		return type->size > 8 && type->size <= 16;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static const char *subprog_name(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_info *info;
@@ -9459,10 +9488,17 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
 		invalidate_outgoing_stack_args(env, cur_func(env));
 
-		/* All non-void global functions return a 64-bit SCALAR_VALUE. */
+		/*
+		 * A non-void global function returns a 64-bit SCALAR_VALUE in
+		 * R0, or a >8 byte SCALAR_VALUE in the R0:R2 register pair.
+		 */
 		if (!subprog_returns_void(env, subprog)) {
 			mark_reg_unknown(env, caller->regs, BPF_REG_0);
 			caller->regs[BPF_REG_0].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+			if (bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, subprog)) {
+				mark_reg_unknown(env, caller->regs, BPF_REG_2);
+				caller->regs[BPF_REG_2].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+			}
 		}
 
 		if (env->subprog_info[subprog].might_throw) {
@@ -9825,6 +9861,13 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
 	} else {
 		/* return to the caller whatever r0 had in the callee */
 		caller->regs[BPF_REG_0] = *r0;
+		if (bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, callee->subprogno)) {
+			if (callee->regs[BPF_REG_2].type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
+				verbose(env, "cannot return stack pointer to the caller\n");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+			caller->regs[BPF_REG_2] = callee->regs[BPF_REG_2];
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* for callbacks like bpf_loop or bpf_for_each_map_elem go back to callsite,
@@ -10745,6 +10788,18 @@ static void mark_btf_func_reg_size(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
 	return __mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, cur_regs(env), regno, reg_size);
 }
 
+static void mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+				    struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 size)
+{
+	if (size > 8) {
+		mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, 8);
+		mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_2);
+		regs[BPF_REG_2].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+	} else {
+		mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, size);
+	}
+}
+
 static bool is_kfunc_acquire(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
 {
 	return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_ACQUIRE;
@@ -13208,7 +13263,22 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		if (meta.btf == btf_vmlinux && (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock] ||
 		    meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave]))
 			__mark_reg_const_zero(env, &regs[BPF_REG_0]);
-		mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, t->size);
+		mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(env, regs, t->size);
+	} else if (btf_type_is_struct(t)) {
+		/*
+		 * The returned struct comes back as raw register bits modeled
+		 * as an unknown scalar, so it must contain only scalars:
+		 * otherwise a pointer field would be laundered into a scalar
+		 * and escape provenance and reference tracking.
+		 */
+		if (!__btf_type_is_scalar_struct(env, desc_btf, t, 0)) {
+			verbose(env, "kernel function %s returns %s %s that is not composed of scalars\n",
+				func_name, btf_type_str(t),
+				btf_name_by_offset(desc_btf, t->name_off));
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
+		mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(env, regs, t->size);
 	} else if (btf_type_is_ptr(t)) {
 		ptr_type = btf_type_skip_modifiers(desc_btf, t->type, &ptr_type_id);
 		err = check_special_kfunc(env, &meta, regs, insn_aux, ptr_type, desc_btf);
@@ -16711,11 +16781,19 @@ static int check_global_subprog_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_state *cur_frame = cur_func(env);
 	u32 subprog = cur_frame->subprogno;
+	int err;
 
 	if (subprog_returns_void(env, subprog))
 		return 0;
 
-	return check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_0);
+	err = check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (!bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, subprog))
+		return 0;
+
+	return check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_2);
 }
 
 /* Bitmask with 1s for all caller saved registers */
@@ -17205,10 +17283,15 @@ static int process_bpf_exit_full(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	 */
 	if (cur_frame->subprogno &&
 	    !cur_frame->in_async_callback_fn &&
-	    !cur_frame->in_exception_callback_fn)
+	    !cur_frame->in_exception_callback_fn) {
 		err = check_global_subprog_return_code(env);
-	else
+	} else {
+		if (!cur_frame->subprogno && bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, 0)) {
+			verbose(env, "return value larger than 8 bytes is not supported at program exit\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 		err = check_return_code(env, BPF_REG_0, "R0");
+	}
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	return PROCESS_BPF_EXIT;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 20:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-07-08 21:17   ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:21   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  4:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:41     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:31   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 21:07   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:06     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Force JIT for programs using the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09  3:15   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:44     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 20:30   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:07     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:27   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:09     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths Yonghong Song
2026-07-09  3:16   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:52     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  2:01       ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 23:08   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  2:02     ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-10  5:27       ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  5:12     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:45   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:51     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 19:54     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:19   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:32     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:38   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:35     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Cover tracing on >8 and <=16 byte return targets Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] Documentation/bpf: Document 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  6:00   ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  6:13     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 15:18       ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708200949.2156169-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox