From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 13:09:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708200949.2156169-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708200939.2153664-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
LLVM 23 added support for returning a value in two registers for an
__int128, or a struct/union whose size is greater than 8 but not more
than 16 bytes. See LLVM patches [1] and [2].
Before LLVM 23 the BPF backend could not return these values at all. A
by-value struct or union return (of any size) was rejected at compile
time with:
error: aggregate returns are not supported
and an __int128 return failed later in the backend with:
fatal error: error in backend: unable to allocate function return #1
Both are resolved in LLVM 23, which lowers such returns into the R0:R2
register pair.
This patch is one of several preparation patches that build up
<=16 byte return support incrementally:
- the verifier R0:R2 modelling in this patch,
- the x86 JIT move and JIT-capability gate,
- precision-backtracking and live-register tracking of R2,
- forcing the JIT for such programs, and
- guarding the trampoline paths.
Finally, the patch "bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types" enables
support for 16-byte returns.
This patch adds handling for '>8' byte returns in several places: BPF
subprogram returns (the main program, and both global and static
subprograms) and kfunc returns.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190894
[2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206876
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3f34ce1a3107..03ffb5f839fa 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -424,6 +424,35 @@ static bool subprog_returns_void(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
return btf_type_is_void(type);
}
+static bool bpf_ret_reg_pair(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
+{
+ const struct btf_type *type, *func, *func_proto;
+ const struct btf *btf = env->prog->aux->btf;
+ u32 btf_id;
+
+ if (!btf || !env->prog->aux->func_info)
+ return false;
+
+ btf_id = env->prog->aux->func_info[subprog].type_id;
+
+ func = btf_type_by_id(btf, btf_id);
+ if (!func)
+ return false;
+
+ func_proto = btf_type_by_id(btf, func->type);
+ if (!func_proto)
+ return false;
+
+ type = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, func_proto->type, NULL);
+ if (!type)
+ return false;
+
+ if (btf_type_is_struct(type) || btf_type_is_scalar(type))
+ return type->size > 8 && type->size <= 16;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static const char *subprog_name(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
{
struct bpf_func_info *info;
@@ -9459,10 +9488,17 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
invalidate_outgoing_stack_args(env, cur_func(env));
- /* All non-void global functions return a 64-bit SCALAR_VALUE. */
+ /*
+ * A non-void global function returns a 64-bit SCALAR_VALUE in
+ * R0, or a >8 byte SCALAR_VALUE in the R0:R2 register pair.
+ */
if (!subprog_returns_void(env, subprog)) {
mark_reg_unknown(env, caller->regs, BPF_REG_0);
caller->regs[BPF_REG_0].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+ if (bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, subprog)) {
+ mark_reg_unknown(env, caller->regs, BPF_REG_2);
+ caller->regs[BPF_REG_2].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+ }
}
if (env->subprog_info[subprog].might_throw) {
@@ -9825,6 +9861,13 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
} else {
/* return to the caller whatever r0 had in the callee */
caller->regs[BPF_REG_0] = *r0;
+ if (bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, callee->subprogno)) {
+ if (callee->regs[BPF_REG_2].type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ verbose(env, "cannot return stack pointer to the caller\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ caller->regs[BPF_REG_2] = callee->regs[BPF_REG_2];
+ }
}
/* for callbacks like bpf_loop or bpf_for_each_map_elem go back to callsite,
@@ -10745,6 +10788,18 @@ static void mark_btf_func_reg_size(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return __mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, cur_regs(env), regno, reg_size);
}
+static void mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 size)
+{
+ if (size > 8) {
+ mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, 8);
+ mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_2);
+ regs[BPF_REG_2].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
+ } else {
+ mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, size);
+ }
+}
+
static bool is_kfunc_acquire(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_ACQUIRE;
@@ -13208,7 +13263,22 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
if (meta.btf == btf_vmlinux && (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock] ||
meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave]))
__mark_reg_const_zero(env, ®s[BPF_REG_0]);
- mark_btf_func_reg_size(env, BPF_REG_0, t->size);
+ mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(env, regs, t->size);
+ } else if (btf_type_is_struct(t)) {
+ /*
+ * The returned struct comes back as raw register bits modeled
+ * as an unknown scalar, so it must contain only scalars:
+ * otherwise a pointer field would be laundered into a scalar
+ * and escape provenance and reference tracking.
+ */
+ if (!__btf_type_is_scalar_struct(env, desc_btf, t, 0)) {
+ verbose(env, "kernel function %s returns %s %s that is not composed of scalars\n",
+ func_name, btf_type_str(t),
+ btf_name_by_offset(desc_btf, t->name_off));
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
+ mark_kfunc_ret_reg_size(env, regs, t->size);
} else if (btf_type_is_ptr(t)) {
ptr_type = btf_type_skip_modifiers(desc_btf, t->type, &ptr_type_id);
err = check_special_kfunc(env, &meta, regs, insn_aux, ptr_type, desc_btf);
@@ -16711,11 +16781,19 @@ static int check_global_subprog_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
struct bpf_func_state *cur_frame = cur_func(env);
u32 subprog = cur_frame->subprogno;
+ int err;
if (subprog_returns_void(env, subprog))
return 0;
- return check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_0);
+ err = check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_0);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (!bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, subprog))
+ return 0;
+
+ return check_global_ret_scalar_reg(env, BPF_REG_2);
}
/* Bitmask with 1s for all caller saved registers */
@@ -17205,10 +17283,15 @@ static int process_bpf_exit_full(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
*/
if (cur_frame->subprogno &&
!cur_frame->in_async_callback_fn &&
- !cur_frame->in_exception_callback_fn)
+ !cur_frame->in_exception_callback_fn) {
err = check_global_subprog_return_code(env);
- else
+ } else {
+ if (!cur_frame->subprogno && bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, 0)) {
+ verbose(env, "return value larger than 8 bytes is not supported at program exit\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
err = check_return_code(env, BPF_REG_0, "R0");
+ }
if (err)
return err;
return PROCESS_BPF_EXIT;
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 20:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-07-08 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:40 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 4:57 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 21:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:06 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Force JIT for programs using the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 3:15 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:44 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 20:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:07 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:09 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 3:16 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:52 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 2:01 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 23:08 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 2:02 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-10 5:27 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 5:12 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:40 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:45 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:29 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:51 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 19:54 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 1:19 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:32 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:57 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 1:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:35 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Cover tracing on >8 and <=16 byte return targets Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] Documentation/bpf: Document 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 6:00 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 6:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 15:18 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708200949.2156169-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox