BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 18:19:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd58c8e1e7265ab59dff6882a2e429da97077fd6.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708201025.2160583-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

On Wed, 2026-07-08 at 13:10 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> Add selftests that exercise a 16-byte return value passed in the R0:R2
> register pair, expressed in C so they rely on the compiler lowering the
> register-pair return. Tests include an __int128 return (from a subprogram
> and a kfunc), a 16-byte struct return (from static and global subprograms
> and a kfunc) and a 16-byte union return.
> 
> The R0:R2 return convention is only emitted by LLVM 23 and newer, so the
> programs are gated on __clang_major__ >= 23; with an older compiler they
> return a sentinel and the "int128_c", "struct_c", "global_struct_c",
> "kfunc_struct_c" and "union_c" subtests are skipped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---

[...]

> +static void run_prog(struct bpf_program *prog, bool may_skip)
> +{
> +	char buf[64] = {};
> +	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
> +		.data_in = buf,
> +		.data_size_in = sizeof(buf),
> +		.repeat = 1,
> +	);
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &topts);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (may_skip && (int)topts.retval == -1) {
> +		test__skip();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "aggregate_ret_result");
> +}
> +
> +void test_aggregate_ret(void)
> +{

The test_aggregate_ret()/run_prog() duplicate functionality provided
by the __retval tag from test_loader.c. To achieve the same skipping
mechanics I suggest to:
- extend test_loader.c / bpf_misc.h with a new tag: __skip("reason")
- use this tag as:

  #ifdef __clang_major__ >= 23

  SEC("tc")
  int aggregate_ret_test(struct __sk_buff *skb) { ... }

  #else

  SEC("tc") __skip("... need clang23 ...")
  int aggregate_ret_test(struct __sk_buff *skb) { ... }

  #endif

[...]

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c ...
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c ...
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c ...

Nit: all three files can be merged into one.

[...]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 20:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:17   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:21   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  4:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:41     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:31   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 21:07   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:06     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Force JIT for programs using the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09  3:15   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:44     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 20:30   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:07     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:27   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:09     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths Yonghong Song
2026-07-09  3:16   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:52     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  2:01       ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 23:08   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  2:02     ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-10  5:27       ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  5:12     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:45   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:51     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 19:54     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:19   ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-07-10  5:32     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:38   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:35     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Cover tracing on >8 and <=16 byte return targets Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] Documentation/bpf: Document 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  6:00   ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  6:13     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 15:18       ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd58c8e1e7265ab59dff6882a2e429da97077fd6.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox