From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 13:10:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708201025.2160583-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708200939.2153664-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Add selftests that exercise a 16-byte return value passed in the R0:R2
register pair, expressed in C so they rely on the compiler lowering the
register-pair return. Tests include an __int128 return (from a subprogram
and a kfunc), a 16-byte struct return (from static and global subprograms
and a kfunc) and a 16-byte union return.
The R0:R2 return convention is only emitted by LLVM 23 and newer, so the
programs are gated on __clang_major__ >= 23; with an older compiler they
return a sentinel and the "int128_c", "struct_c", "global_struct_c",
"kfunc_struct_c" and "union_c" subtests are skipped.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c | 48 +++++++++
.../bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c | 51 ++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 14 +++
.../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h | 11 +++
6 files changed, 318 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d4ecc19684ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include "aggregate_ret_int128_c.skel.h"
+#include "aggregate_ret_struct_c.skel.h"
+#include "aggregate_ret_union_c.skel.h"
+
+/*
+ * Run one program and check its result. The program returns 0 on success, or
+ * 1..4 identifying which half of which aggregate (R0:R2) return value came back
+ * wrong. A return of -1 means the program was built with an LLVM that lacks
+ * R0:R2 16-byte return support, in which case the subtest is skipped.
+ */
+static void run_prog(struct bpf_program *prog, bool may_skip)
+{
+ char buf[64] = {};
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .data_in = buf,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(buf),
+ .repeat = 1,
+ );
+ int err;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &topts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"))
+ return;
+
+ if (may_skip && (int)topts.retval == -1) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "aggregate_ret_result");
+}
+
+void test_aggregate_ret(void)
+{
+ struct aggregate_ret_struct_c *skel_struct_c;
+ struct aggregate_ret_union_c *skel_union_c;
+ struct aggregate_ret_int128_c *skel_c;
+
+ skel_c = aggregate_ret_int128_c__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_c, "skel_c_open_load"))
+ return;
+
+ /* C variant (__int128): relies on LLVM 23 R0:R2 codegen, skipped otherwise. */
+ if (test__start_subtest("int128_c"))
+ run_prog(skel_c->progs.aggregate_ret_test, true);
+
+ aggregate_ret_int128_c__destroy(skel_c);
+
+ skel_struct_c = aggregate_ret_struct_c__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_struct_c, "skel_struct_c_open_load"))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * C variant returning a 16-byte struct by value: exercises the struct
+ * branch of bpf_ret_reg_pair(). Also LLVM 23 only.
+ */
+ if (test__start_subtest("struct_c"))
+ run_prog(skel_struct_c->progs.aggregate_ret_struct_c_test, true);
+
+ /*
+ * Same 16-byte struct return, but from a global (non-static) callee:
+ * exercises the compiler lowering a global struct-returning function to
+ * R0:R2 and the verifier's global return path end to end. Also LLVM 23
+ * only.
+ */
+ if (test__start_subtest("global_struct_c"))
+ run_prog(skel_struct_c->progs.aggregate_ret_global_struct_c_test, true);
+
+ /*
+ * Same 16-byte struct, but returned by value from a kfunc: exercises
+ * the struct branch of check_kfunc_call() and the JIT RDX->R2 move.
+ * Also LLVM 23 only.
+ */
+ if (test__start_subtest("kfunc_struct_c"))
+ run_prog(skel_struct_c->progs.aggregate_ret_kfunc_struct_c_test, true);
+
+ aggregate_ret_struct_c__destroy(skel_struct_c);
+
+ skel_union_c = aggregate_ret_union_c__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_union_c, "skel_union_c_open_load"))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * C variant returning a 16-byte union by value: exercises the union BTF
+ * kind through the same struct branch of bpf_ret_reg_pair().
+ * Also LLVM 23 only.
+ */
+ if (test__start_subtest("union_c"))
+ run_prog(skel_union_c->progs.aggregate_ret_union_c_test, true);
+
+ aggregate_ret_union_c__destroy(skel_union_c);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0b0c4fa52b62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+#if __clang_major__ >= 23
+
+typedef unsigned __int128 u128;
+
+static __attribute__((noinline)) u128 make_i128(__u64 a, __u64 b)
+{
+ return ((u128)a << 64) | b;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xdeadbeefULL;
+ u128 v;
+
+ v = make_i128(a, b);
+ if ((__u64)(v >> 64) != a)
+ return 1;
+ if ((__u64)v != b)
+ return 2;
+
+ v = bpf_kfunc_call_test_i128(a, b);
+ if ((__u64)(v >> 64) != a)
+ return 3;
+ if ((__u64)v != b)
+ return 4;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return -1;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ad8d44755d24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+#if __clang_major__ >= 23
+
+struct pair {
+ __u64 hi;
+ __u64 lo;
+};
+
+static __attribute__((noinline)) struct pair make_pair(__u64 a, __u64 b)
+{
+ struct pair p = { .hi = a, .lo = b };
+
+ return p;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xdeadbeefULL;
+ struct pair p;
+
+ p = make_pair(a, b);
+ if (p.hi != a)
+ return 1;
+ if (p.lo != b)
+ return 2;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__attribute__((noinline)) struct pair make_pair_global(__u64 a, __u64 b)
+{
+ struct pair p = { .hi = a, .lo = b };
+
+ return p;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_global_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xcafef00dULL;
+ struct pair p;
+
+ p = make_pair_global(a, b);
+ if (p.hi != a)
+ return 1;
+ if (p.lo != b)
+ return 2;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_kfunc_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xfeedfaceULL;
+ struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll p;
+
+ p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_ret_ll(a, b);
+ if (p.a != a)
+ return 1;
+ if (p.b != b)
+ return 2;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return -1;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_global_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return -1;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_kfunc_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return -1;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..53e21753291b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+#if __clang_major__ >= 23
+
+union pair {
+ __u64 halves[2];
+ struct {
+ __u64 lo;
+ __u64 hi;
+ } parts;
+};
+
+static __attribute__((noinline)) union pair make_pair(__u64 a, __u64 b)
+{
+ union pair p;
+
+ p.parts.lo = a;
+ p.parts.hi = b;
+ return p;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_union_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xdeadbeefULL;
+ union pair p;
+
+ p = make_pair(a, b);
+ if (p.parts.lo != a)
+ return 1;
+ if (p.parts.hi != b)
+ return 2;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_union_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return -1;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index 30f1cd23093c..3511a4873d6c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -825,6 +825,18 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_test5(u8 a, u16 b, u32 c)
return 0;
}
+__bpf_kfunc __int128 bpf_kfunc_call_test_i128(u64 a, u64 b)
+{
+ return ((__int128)a << 64) | b;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll bpf_kfunc_call_test_ret_ll(u64 a, u64 b)
+{
+ struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll r = { .a = a, .b = b };
+
+ return r;
+}
+
__bpf_kfunc u64 bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c, u64 d,
u64 e, u64 f, u64 g, u64 h,
u64 i, u64 j)
@@ -1358,6 +1370,8 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test3)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test4)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test5)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_i128)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_ret_ll)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg_ptr)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg_mix)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index c36bb911defa..34d0a352e70d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -55,6 +55,15 @@ struct prog_test_big_arg {
__u64 b;
};
+/*
+ * A 16-byte struct returned by value from a kfunc, returned in the R0:R2
+ * register pair.
+ */
+struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll { /* 16 bytes: R0:R2 */
+ __u64 a;
+ __u64 b;
+};
+
struct prog_test_fail1 {
void *p;
int x;
@@ -118,6 +127,8 @@ int bpf_kfunc_call_test2(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u32 b) __ksym;
struct sock *bpf_kfunc_call_test3(struct sock *sk) __ksym;
long bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d) __ksym;
int bpf_kfunc_call_test5(__u8 a, __u16 b, __u32 c) __ksym;
+__int128 bpf_kfunc_call_test_i128(__u64 a, __u64 b) __ksym;
+struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll bpf_kfunc_call_test_ret_ll(__u64 a, __u64 b) __ksym;
__u64 bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg(__u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d,
__u64 e, __u64 f, __u64 g, __u64 h,
__u64 i, __u64 j) __ksym;
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 20:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:40 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 4:57 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 21:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:06 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Force JIT for programs using the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 3:15 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:44 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 20:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:07 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:09 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 3:16 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:52 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 2:01 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 23:08 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 2:02 ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-10 5:27 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 5:12 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:40 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:45 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:29 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-07-08 20:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:51 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 19:54 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 1:19 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:32 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:57 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 1:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 5:35 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Cover tracing on >8 and <=16 byte return targets Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] Documentation/bpf: Document 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 6:00 ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10 6:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 15:18 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708201025.2160583-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox