BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2
Date: Wed,  8 Jul 2026 13:10:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708201025.2160583-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708200939.2153664-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Add selftests that exercise a 16-byte return value passed in the R0:R2
register pair, expressed in C so they rely on the compiler lowering the
register-pair return. Tests include an __int128 return (from a subprogram
and a kfunc), a 16-byte struct return (from static and global subprograms
and a kfunc) and a 16-byte union return.

The R0:R2 return convention is only emitted by LLVM 23 and newer, so the
programs are gated on __clang_major__ >= 23; with an older compiler they
return a sentinel and the "int128_c", "struct_c", "global_struct_c",
"kfunc_struct_c" and "union_c" subtests are skipped.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c  | 96 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c        | 48 +++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c        | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c         | 51 ++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c    | 14 +++
 .../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h        | 11 +++
 6 files changed, 318 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d4ecc19684ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/aggregate_ret.c
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include "aggregate_ret_int128_c.skel.h"
+#include "aggregate_ret_struct_c.skel.h"
+#include "aggregate_ret_union_c.skel.h"
+
+/*
+ * Run one program and check its result. The program returns 0 on success, or
+ * 1..4 identifying which half of which aggregate (R0:R2) return value came back
+ * wrong. A return of -1 means the program was built with an LLVM that lacks
+ * R0:R2 16-byte return support, in which case the subtest is skipped.
+ */
+static void run_prog(struct bpf_program *prog, bool may_skip)
+{
+	char buf[64] = {};
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+		.data_in = buf,
+		.data_size_in = sizeof(buf),
+		.repeat = 1,
+	);
+	int err;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &topts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"))
+		return;
+
+	if (may_skip && (int)topts.retval == -1) {
+		test__skip();
+		return;
+	}
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "aggregate_ret_result");
+}
+
+void test_aggregate_ret(void)
+{
+	struct aggregate_ret_struct_c *skel_struct_c;
+	struct aggregate_ret_union_c *skel_union_c;
+	struct aggregate_ret_int128_c *skel_c;
+
+	skel_c = aggregate_ret_int128_c__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_c, "skel_c_open_load"))
+		return;
+
+	/* C variant (__int128): relies on LLVM 23 R0:R2 codegen, skipped otherwise. */
+	if (test__start_subtest("int128_c"))
+		run_prog(skel_c->progs.aggregate_ret_test, true);
+
+	aggregate_ret_int128_c__destroy(skel_c);
+
+	skel_struct_c = aggregate_ret_struct_c__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_struct_c, "skel_struct_c_open_load"))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * C variant returning a 16-byte struct by value: exercises the struct
+	 * branch of bpf_ret_reg_pair(). Also LLVM 23 only.
+	 */
+	if (test__start_subtest("struct_c"))
+		run_prog(skel_struct_c->progs.aggregate_ret_struct_c_test, true);
+
+	/*
+	 * Same 16-byte struct return, but from a global (non-static) callee:
+	 * exercises the compiler lowering a global struct-returning function to
+	 * R0:R2 and the verifier's global return path end to end. Also LLVM 23
+	 * only.
+	 */
+	if (test__start_subtest("global_struct_c"))
+		run_prog(skel_struct_c->progs.aggregate_ret_global_struct_c_test, true);
+
+	/*
+	 * Same 16-byte struct, but returned by value from a kfunc: exercises
+	 * the struct branch of check_kfunc_call() and the JIT RDX->R2 move.
+	 * Also LLVM 23 only.
+	 */
+	if (test__start_subtest("kfunc_struct_c"))
+		run_prog(skel_struct_c->progs.aggregate_ret_kfunc_struct_c_test, true);
+
+	aggregate_ret_struct_c__destroy(skel_struct_c);
+
+	skel_union_c = aggregate_ret_union_c__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_union_c, "skel_union_c_open_load"))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * C variant returning a 16-byte union by value: exercises the union BTF
+	 * kind through the same struct branch of bpf_ret_reg_pair().
+	 * Also LLVM 23 only.
+	 */
+	if (test__start_subtest("union_c"))
+		run_prog(skel_union_c->progs.aggregate_ret_union_c_test, true);
+
+	aggregate_ret_union_c__destroy(skel_union_c);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0b0c4fa52b62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_int128_c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+#if __clang_major__ >= 23
+
+typedef unsigned __int128 u128;
+
+static __attribute__((noinline)) u128 make_i128(__u64 a, __u64 b)
+{
+	return ((u128)a << 64) | b;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xdeadbeefULL;
+	u128 v;
+
+	v = make_i128(a, b);
+	if ((__u64)(v >> 64) != a)
+		return 1;
+	if ((__u64)v != b)
+		return 2;
+
+	v = bpf_kfunc_call_test_i128(a, b);
+	if ((__u64)(v >> 64) != a)
+		return 3;
+	if ((__u64)v != b)
+		return 4;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ad8d44755d24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_struct_c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+#if __clang_major__ >= 23
+
+struct pair {
+	__u64 hi;
+	__u64 lo;
+};
+
+static __attribute__((noinline)) struct pair make_pair(__u64 a, __u64 b)
+{
+	struct pair p = { .hi = a, .lo = b };
+
+	return p;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xdeadbeefULL;
+	struct pair p;
+
+	p = make_pair(a, b);
+	if (p.hi != a)
+		return 1;
+	if (p.lo != b)
+		return 2;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__attribute__((noinline)) struct pair make_pair_global(__u64 a, __u64 b)
+{
+	struct pair p = { .hi = a, .lo = b };
+
+	return p;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_global_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xcafef00dULL;
+	struct pair p;
+
+	p = make_pair_global(a, b);
+	if (p.hi != a)
+		return 1;
+	if (p.lo != b)
+		return 2;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_kfunc_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xfeedfaceULL;
+	struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll p;
+
+	p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_ret_ll(a, b);
+	if (p.a != a)
+		return 1;
+	if (p.b != b)
+		return 2;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_global_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_kfunc_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..53e21753291b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/aggregate_ret_union_c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+#if __clang_major__ >= 23
+
+union pair {
+	__u64 halves[2];
+	struct {
+		__u64 lo;
+		__u64 hi;
+	} parts;
+};
+
+static __attribute__((noinline)) union pair make_pair(__u64 a, __u64 b)
+{
+	union pair p;
+
+	p.parts.lo = a;
+	p.parts.hi = b;
+	return p;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_union_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = skb->len;
+	__u64 b = skb->len ^ 0xdeadbeefULL;
+	union pair p;
+
+	p = make_pair(a, b);
+	if (p.parts.lo != a)
+		return 1;
+	if (p.parts.hi != b)
+		return 2;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+SEC("tc")
+int aggregate_ret_union_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index 30f1cd23093c..3511a4873d6c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -825,6 +825,18 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_test5(u8 a, u16 b, u32 c)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+__bpf_kfunc __int128 bpf_kfunc_call_test_i128(u64 a, u64 b)
+{
+	return ((__int128)a << 64) | b;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll bpf_kfunc_call_test_ret_ll(u64 a, u64 b)
+{
+	struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll r = { .a = a, .b = b };
+
+	return r;
+}
+
 __bpf_kfunc u64 bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c, u64 d,
 					 u64 e, u64 f, u64 g, u64 h,
 					 u64 i, u64 j)
@@ -1358,6 +1370,8 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test2)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test3)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test4)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test5)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_i128)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_ret_ll)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg_ptr)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg_mix)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index c36bb911defa..34d0a352e70d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -55,6 +55,15 @@ struct prog_test_big_arg {
 	__u64 b;
 };
 
+/*
+ * A 16-byte struct returned by value from a kfunc, returned in the R0:R2
+ * register pair.
+ */
+struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll {	/* 16 bytes: R0:R2 */
+	__u64 a;
+	__u64 b;
+};
+
 struct prog_test_fail1 {
 	void *p;
 	int x;
@@ -118,6 +127,8 @@ int bpf_kfunc_call_test2(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u32 b) __ksym;
 struct sock *bpf_kfunc_call_test3(struct sock *sk) __ksym;
 long bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d) __ksym;
 int bpf_kfunc_call_test5(__u8 a, __u16 b, __u32 c) __ksym;
+__int128 bpf_kfunc_call_test_i128(__u64 a, __u64 b) __ksym;
+struct bpf_kfunc_ret_ll bpf_kfunc_call_test_ret_ll(__u64 a, __u64 b) __ksym;
 __u64 bpf_kfunc_call_stack_arg(__u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d,
 			       __u64 e, __u64 f, __u64 g, __u64 h,
 			       __u64 i, __u64 j) __ksym;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 20:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor check_global_ret_scalar_reg() out of the global return check Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Add verifier support for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:17   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:21   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  4:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Wire up JIT support for 16-byte kfunc returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Track R2 of register-pair returns in precision backtracking Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 16:41     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:31   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Account R2 of register-pair returns in live register analysis Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 21:07   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:06     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Force JIT for programs using the R0:R2 register pair Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09  3:15   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:44     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 20:30   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:07     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-09 22:27   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:09     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths Yonghong Song
2026-07-09  3:16   ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 16:52     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  2:01       ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-09 23:08   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  2:02     ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-10  5:27       ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  5:12     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Enable 16-byte aggregate return types Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:45   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-07-08 20:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for 16-byte returns in R0:R2 sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:51     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 21:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 19:54     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:19   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:32     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  1:38   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  5:35     ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Cover tracing on >8 and <=16 byte return targets Yonghong Song
2026-07-08 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] Documentation/bpf: Document 16-byte kfunc return values in R0:R2 Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  0:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support 16-byte return values in the R0:R2 register pair Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10  6:00   ` Yonghong Song
2026-07-10  6:13     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-10 15:18       ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708201025.2160583-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox