From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vladimir Vdovin" <deliran@verdict.gg>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 20:45:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708204535.0C85F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708203410.45121-6-deliran@verdict.gg>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Addition of fields to `struct xdp_meta` changes its size from 32 bytes to 44 bytes, causing an alignment-induced offset mismatch between 64-bit BPF programs and 32-bit userspace architectures.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog ---
commit 1839c76747e10e7e5dc96d9eb03c1675cdf0e646
Author: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: Add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog
This patch introduces the capability to dump the HW rx checksum in the
xdp_hw_metadata program. It achieves this by using the new
bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum() kfunc.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h
> index bca09b94af261..f864d4a8bd8c6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -52,10 +53,13 @@ struct xdp_meta {
> };
> __s32 rx_vlan_tag_err;
> };
> - struct {
> - __u32 ip_summed;
> - __u32 cksum;
> - __u8 cksum_level;
> + union {
> + struct {
> + __u32 ip_summed;
> + __u32 cksum;
> + __u8 cksum_level;
> + };
> + __s32 rx_cksum_err;
> };
> enum xdp_meta_field hint_valid;
> };
[Severity: Medium]
Does this change create an alignment mismatch between the 64-bit BPF program
and 32-bit userspace architectures?
The addition of these fields changes the size of struct xdp_meta to 44 bytes.
On a 32-bit x86 system, the __u64 fields earlier in the struct require only
4-byte alignment, keeping the userspace struct size at exactly 44 bytes.
However, the BPF program runs in a 64-bit context where __u64 requires 8-byte
alignment, causing the compiler to pad the struct to 48 bytes.
When verify_xdp_metadata() is called in userspace:
meta = data - sizeof(*meta);
Userspace will subtract 44 bytes from the packet data pointer, while the
BPF program actually placed it at data - 48. Could this shift all metadata
reads by 4 bytes on 32-bit platforms, leading to incorrect results and
metadata corruption?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708203410.45121-1-deliran@verdict.gg?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 20:34 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/6] Add the capability to load HW RX checksum in eBPF programs Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] netlink: specs: Add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 10:09 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-10 19:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/6] net: veth: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback to veth driver Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 10:09 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/6] net: ice: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 10:10 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add selftest support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-10 10:11 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests: drv-net: add XDP RX checksum metadata tests Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 10:12 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708204535.0C85F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=deliran@verdict.gg \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox