From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/17] bpf: Report Resource Lifetime reference leaks
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:38:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713153910.2556007-11-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713153910.2556007-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Augment selected Resource Lifetime Safety failures with structured diagnostics
while preserving the existing verifier messages.
Report unreleased references from check_reference_leak() using
reference-scoped diagnostic history, and add state reports for dynptr,
iterator, lock, and IRQ-flag lifetime misuse.
IRQ restore mismatch and out-of-order diagnostics use IRQ context-scoped
history when an IRQ-disabled region is active, so retained save/restore context
is still visible after per-state history removal.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h | 9 ++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 273 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c
index d4588b19aac9..e454bcd0a0e0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c
@@ -1644,6 +1644,97 @@ void bpf_diag_report_mem_bounds(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, int
"stays within the object.");
}
+static const char *diag_lock_name(const struct bpf_reference_state *lock)
+{
+ switch (lock->type) {
+ case REF_TYPE_LOCK:
+ return "bpf_spin_lock";
+ case REF_TYPE_RES_LOCK:
+ return "resource spin lock";
+ case REF_TYPE_RES_LOCK_IRQ:
+ return "IRQ-saving resource spin lock";
+ default:
+ return "lock";
+ }
+}
+
+static void diag_res_report(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *problem,
+ const char *reason)
+{
+ bpf_diag_report_header(env, CATEGORY_RESOURCE_LIFETIME_SAFETY, problem);
+ diag_report_reason(env, "%s", reason);
+
+ diag_report_section(env, "At");
+ bpf_diag_report_source(env, insn_idx, "error", "%s", problem);
+}
+
+void bpf_diag_res(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *problem,
+ const char *reason, const char *suggestion)
+{
+ diag_res_report(env, insn_idx, problem, reason);
+ diag_report_suggestion(env, "%s", suggestion);
+}
+
+void bpf_diag_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *problem,
+ const char *reason, const char *suggestion,
+ const struct bpf_reference_state *active_lock)
+{
+ diag_res_report(env, insn_idx, problem, reason);
+
+ if (active_lock) {
+ diag_report_section(env, "Active lock");
+ bpf_diag_report_source(env, active_lock->insn_idx, "acquired",
+ "active %s has verifier identity %d",
+ diag_lock_name(active_lock), active_lock->id);
+ }
+
+ diag_report_suggestion(env, "%s", suggestion);
+}
+
+void bpf_diag_irq(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *problem,
+ const char *reason, const char *suggestion, u32 depth)
+{
+ struct bpf_diag_history_opts opts = {
+ .scope = BPF_DIAG_HISTORY_SCOPE_CONTEXT,
+ .ctx_kind = BPF_DIAG_CONTEXT_IRQ,
+ .ctx_depth = depth,
+ };
+
+ bpf_diag_report_header(env, CATEGORY_RESOURCE_LIFETIME_SAFETY, problem);
+ diag_report_reason(env, "%s", reason);
+
+ diag_report_section(env, "At");
+ bpf_diag_report_source(env, insn_idx, "error", "%s", problem);
+
+ if (depth)
+ diag_print_history(env, &opts);
+
+ diag_report_suggestion(env, "%s", suggestion);
+}
+
+void bpf_diag_leak(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 ref_id, u32 alloc_insn, u32 fail_insn)
+{
+ struct bpf_diag_history_opts opts = {
+ .scope = BPF_DIAG_HISTORY_SCOPE_REF,
+ .ref_id = ref_id,
+ };
+
+ bpf_diag_report_header(env, CATEGORY_RESOURCE_LIFETIME_SAFETY, "unreleased resource");
+ diag_report_reason(env,
+ "Owned resource (id=%u) was acquired at instruction %u and still needs "
+ "to be released before this exit path.",
+ ref_id, alloc_insn);
+
+ diag_report_section(env, "At");
+ bpf_diag_report_source(env, fail_insn, "error",
+ "owned resource (id=%u) still needs release", ref_id);
+
+ diag_print_history(env, &opts);
+
+ diag_report_suggestion(env, "Release or transfer ownership of the acquired resource on "
+ "every path before the program exits.");
+}
+
static void diag_format_var_offset(struct bpf_diag_reg_fmt *fmt, char *buf, size_t size,
const struct bpf_diag_reg_snapshot *snapshot)
{
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h
index 4fc8abb2f2b9..73ddede41d17 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h
+++ b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/compiler_attributes.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+struct bpf_reference_state;
struct bpf_reg_state;
struct bpf_verifier_env;
struct bpf_verifier_state;
@@ -142,6 +143,14 @@ void bpf_diag_report_memory(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const ch
void bpf_diag_report_mem_bounds(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, int regno,
const char *reg_name, const char *type_name, const char *proof,
int off, int size, u32 mem_size, const struct bpf_reg_state *reg);
+void bpf_diag_res(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *problem,
+ const char *reason, const char *suggestion);
+void bpf_diag_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *problem,
+ const char *reason, const char *suggestion,
+ const struct bpf_reference_state *active_lock);
+void bpf_diag_irq(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *problem,
+ const char *reason, const char *suggestion, u32 depth);
+void bpf_diag_leak(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 ref_id, u32 alloc_insn, u32 fail_insn);
int bpf_diag_record_branch(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, bool cond_true);
void bpf_diag_record_mod(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx,
struct bpf_diag_mod_target target, enum bpf_diag_mod_reason reason,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bd233083b495..84eda5e83f87 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -840,6 +840,12 @@ static int destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
if (dynptr_type_referenced(state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type) &&
dynptr_ref_cnt(env, state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent_id) <= 1) {
verbose(env, "cannot overwrite referenced dynptr\n");
+ bpf_diag_res(env, env->insn_idx, "referenced dynptr overwrite",
+ "This stack slot contains a dynptr that owns or protects a referenced "
+ "resource. Overwriting the last dynptr for that resource would lose "
+ "the verifier-tracked release path.",
+ "Release or clone the dynptr so another live dynptr still tracks the "
+ "referenced resource before overwriting this stack slot.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -910,26 +916,29 @@ static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_re
return true;
}
-static bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
- enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
+static enum bpf_dynptr_type dynptr_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
- struct bpf_func_state *state = bpf_func(env, reg);
- enum bpf_dynptr_type dynptr_type;
+ struct bpf_func_state *state;
int spi;
+ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
+ return reg->dynptr.type;
+
+ spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg);
+ if (spi < 0)
+ return BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_INVALID;
+ state = bpf_func(env, reg);
+ return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type;
+}
+
+static bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
+{
/* ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR takes any type of dynptr */
if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
return true;
- dynptr_type = arg_to_dynptr_type(arg_type);
- if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
- return reg->dynptr.type == dynptr_type;
- } else {
- spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg);
- if (spi < 0)
- return false;
- return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type == dynptr_type;
- }
+ return dynptr_reg_type(env, reg) == arg_to_dynptr_type(arg_type);
}
static void __mark_reg_known_zero(struct bpf_reg_state *reg);
@@ -1120,11 +1129,21 @@ static int unmark_stack_slot_irq_flag(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_r
st = &slot->spilled_ptr;
if (st->irq.kfunc_class != kfunc_class) {
- const char *flag_kfunc = st->irq.kfunc_class == IRQ_NATIVE_KFUNC ? "native" : "lock";
+ const char *fmt = "This IRQ flag was saved by %s IRQ kfuncs, but the restore call "
+ "belongs to the %s IRQ kfunc family. Save and restore operations "
+ "must use the same family.";
+ const char *flag_kfunc = st->irq.kfunc_class == IRQ_NATIVE_KFUNC ? "native" :
+ "lock";
const char *used_kfunc = kfunc_class == IRQ_NATIVE_KFUNC ? "native" : "lock";
+ const char *reason;
verbose(env, "irq flag acquired by %s kfuncs cannot be restored with %s kfuncs\n",
flag_kfunc, used_kfunc);
+ reason = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 0, fmt, flag_kfunc, used_kfunc);
+ bpf_diag_irq(env, env->insn_idx, "IRQ flag restore mismatch", reason,
+ "Restore the flag with the matching IRQ restore kfunc for the save "
+ "operation that created it.",
+ bpf_diag_irq_depth(env->cur_state));
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1142,6 +1161,11 @@ static int unmark_stack_slot_irq_flag(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_r
verbose(env, "cannot restore irq state out of order, expected id=%d acquired at insn_idx=%d\n",
env->cur_state->active_irq_id, insn_idx);
+ bpf_diag_irq(env, env->insn_idx, "IRQ flag restore out of order",
+ "IRQ-disabled regions must be restored in last-in, first-out order, "
+ "but this restore does not match the currently active IRQ flag.",
+ "Restore nested IRQ flags in the reverse order they were saved.",
+ bpf_diag_irq_depth(env->cur_state));
return err;
}
@@ -7356,11 +7380,13 @@ enum {
* env->cur_state->active_locks remembers which map value element or allocated
* object got locked and clears it after bpf_spin_unlock.
*/
-static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, argno_t argno, int flags)
+static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, argno_t argno,
+ int flags)
{
bool is_lock = flags & PROCESS_SPIN_LOCK, is_res_lock = flags & PROCESS_RES_LOCK;
const char *lock_str = is_res_lock ? "bpf_res_spin" : "bpf_spin";
struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state;
+ struct bpf_reference_state *lock;
bool is_const = tnum_is_const(reg->var_off);
bool is_irq = flags & PROCESS_LOCK_IRQ;
u64 val = reg->var_off.value;
@@ -7410,14 +7436,30 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
ptr = btf;
if (!is_res_lock && cur->active_locks) {
- if (find_lock_state(env->cur_state, REF_TYPE_LOCK, 0, NULL)) {
+ lock = find_lock_state(cur, REF_TYPE_LOCK, 0, NULL);
+ if (lock) {
verbose(env,
"Locking two bpf_spin_locks are not allowed\n");
+ bpf_diag_lock(env, env->insn_idx, "nested spin lock",
+ "This path already holds a bpf_spin_lock. The "
+ "verifier allows only one regular BPF spin lock at a "
+ "time.",
+ "Unlock the current bpf_spin_lock before taking "
+ "another one.",
+ lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
} else if (is_res_lock && cur->active_locks) {
- if (find_lock_state(env->cur_state, REF_TYPE_RES_LOCK | REF_TYPE_RES_LOCK_IRQ, reg->id, ptr)) {
+ lock = find_lock_state(cur, REF_TYPE_RES_LOCK | REF_TYPE_RES_LOCK_IRQ,
+ reg->id, ptr);
+ if (lock) {
verbose(env, "Acquiring the same lock again, AA deadlock detected\n");
+ bpf_diag_lock(env, env->insn_idx, "recursive resource spin lock",
+ "This path already holds the same resource spin "
+ "lock. Taking it again would deadlock.",
+ "Avoid reacquiring the same resource spin lock "
+ "before it is unlocked.",
+ lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
@@ -7444,6 +7486,11 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
if (!cur->active_locks) {
verbose(env, "%s_unlock without taking a lock\n", lock_str);
+ bpf_diag_res(env, env->insn_idx, "unlock without lock",
+ "This unlock operation has no matching active lock on the "
+ "current path.",
+ "Take the matching lock before this unlock, or remove the "
+ "unmatched unlock path.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -7453,16 +7500,40 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
type = REF_TYPE_RES_LOCK;
else
type = REF_TYPE_LOCK;
- if (!find_lock_state(cur, type, reg->id, ptr)) {
- verbose(env, "%s_unlock of different lock\n", lock_str);
+
+ lock = find_lock_state(cur, type, reg->id, ptr);
+ if (!lock) {
+ verbose(env, "%s_unlock of a different lock\n", lock_str);
+ lock = find_lock_state(cur, REF_TYPE_LOCK_MASK, cur->active_lock_id,
+ cur->active_lock_ptr);
+ bpf_diag_lock(env, env->insn_idx, "unlock of a different lock",
+ "This unlock does not match any active lock with the same "
+ "tracked identity on the current path.",
+ "Unlock the same lock object that was most recently "
+ "acquired.",
+ lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (reg->id != cur->active_lock_id || ptr != cur->active_lock_ptr) {
verbose(env, "%s_unlock cannot be out of order\n", lock_str);
+ lock = find_lock_state(cur, REF_TYPE_LOCK_MASK, cur->active_lock_id,
+ cur->active_lock_ptr);
+ bpf_diag_lock(env, env->insn_idx, "unlock out of order",
+ "Locks must be released in last-in, first-out order, but "
+ "this unlock does not match the currently active lock.",
+ "Release nested locks in the reverse order they were "
+ "acquired.",
+ lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (release_lock_state(env, type, reg->id, ptr)) {
- verbose(env, "%s_unlock of different lock\n", lock_str);
+ verbose(env, "%s_unlock of a different lock\n", lock_str);
+ bpf_diag_lock(env, env->insn_idx, "unlock of a different lock",
+ "The verifier could not release a lock state matching this "
+ "unlock operation.",
+ "Pass the same lock object and lock kind that were used for "
+ "the matching lock operation.",
+ lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -7471,7 +7542,6 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
return 0;
}
-/* Check if @regno is a pointer to a specific field in a map value */
static int check_map_field_pointer(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, argno_t argno,
enum btf_field_type field_type,
struct bpf_map_desc *map_desc)
@@ -7625,9 +7695,18 @@ static int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_stat
int spi, err = 0;
if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK && reg->type != CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
+ const char *fmt = "A dynptr argument must be a pointer to a dynptr stack slot or a "
+ "verifier-provided const struct bpf_dynptr, but %s is %s.";
+ const char *reason;
+
verbose(env,
"%s expected pointer to stack or const struct bpf_dynptr\n",
reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ reason = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 0, fmt, reg_arg_name(env, argno),
+ bpf_diag_reg_type_plain(env, reg->type));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "invalid dynptr argument", reason,
+ "Pass the address of a stack dynptr object, or use a const dynptr "
+ "pointer returned by the verifier-supported path.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -7650,6 +7729,12 @@ static int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_stat
if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) {
verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n");
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "dynptr is already initialized",
+ "This kfunc constructs a dynptr and requires an uninitialized "
+ "dynptr stack slot, but the selected slot already holds "
+ "dynptr state.",
+ "Use a fresh stack dynptr slot, or release/destroy the "
+ "existing dynptr before reusing the slot.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -7666,21 +7751,41 @@ static int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_stat
/* For the reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK case, bpf_dynptr is never const */
if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR && (arg_type & OBJ_RELEASE)) {
verbose(env, "CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR cannot be released\n");
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "const dynptr release",
+ "This release operation was given a const dynptr. Const "
+ "dynptr values are verifier-provided views and cannot be "
+ "released by the program.",
+ "Release only mutable dynptrs that the program initialized or "
+ "reserved.");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) {
verbose(env, "Expected an initialized dynptr as %s\n",
reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "uninitialized dynptr use",
+ "This operation requires an initialized dynptr, but the stack "
+ "slot does not currently hold a valid dynptr on this path.",
+ "Initialize the dynptr on every path before this call, and "
+ "avoid overwriting or releasing it before this use.");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Fold modifiers (in this case, OBJ_RELEASE) when checking expected type */
if (!is_dynptr_type_expected(env, reg, arg_type & ~OBJ_RELEASE)) {
- verbose(env,
- "Expected a dynptr of type %s as %s\n",
- dynptr_type_str(arg_to_dynptr_type(arg_type)),
- reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ const char *fmt = "The dynptr is initialized with backing object type %s, "
+ "but this operation expects dynptr type %s.";
+ enum bpf_dynptr_type expected_type = arg_to_dynptr_type(arg_type);
+ enum bpf_dynptr_type actual_type = dynptr_reg_type(env, reg);
+ const char *reason;
+
+ verbose(env, "Expected a dynptr of type %s as %s\n",
+ dynptr_type_str(expected_type), reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ reason = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 0, fmt, dynptr_type_str(actual_type),
+ dynptr_type_str(expected_type));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "wrong dynptr type", reason,
+ "Use a dynptr constructor that matches this operation, or "
+ "call an operation that accepts the dynptr's current type.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -7747,8 +7852,17 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *
int spi, err, i, nr_slots, btf_id;
if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ const char *fmt = "Iterator state must live in verifier-tracked stack memory, but "
+ "%s is %s.";
+ const char *reason;
+
verbose(env, "%s expected pointer to an iterator on stack\n",
reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ reason = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 0, fmt, reg_arg_name(env, argno),
+ bpf_diag_reg_type_plain(env, reg->type));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "invalid iterator argument", reason,
+ "Pass the address of a stack iterator object for iterator new, next, "
+ "and destroy calls.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -7762,6 +7876,10 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *
if (btf_id < 0) {
verbose(env, "expected valid iter pointer as %s\n",
reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "invalid iterator type",
+ "The kfunc expects a recognized iterator state pointer, but this "
+ "argument does not match a valid iterator type.",
+ "Pass the exact iterator state type expected by this kfunc.");
return -EINVAL;
}
t = btf_type_by_id(meta->btf, btf_id);
@@ -7772,6 +7890,12 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *
if (!is_iter_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg, nr_slots)) {
verbose(env, "expected uninitialized iter_%s as %s\n",
iter_type_str(meta->btf, btf_id), reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "iterator is already initialized",
+ "Iterator creation requires an uninitialized iterator stack "
+ "object, but this stack range already contains iterator "
+ "state.",
+ "Use a fresh iterator stack slot, or destroy the existing "
+ "iterator before reusing the slot.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -7796,9 +7920,21 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *
case -EINVAL:
verbose(env, "expected an initialized iter_%s as %s\n",
iter_type_str(meta->btf, btf_id), reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "uninitialized iterator use",
+ "This iterator operation requires an initialized iterator "
+ "state object, but the stack range does not contain a live "
+ "iterator on this path.",
+ "Call the matching iterator new kfunc on every path before "
+ "calling next or destroy, and do not destroy the iterator "
+ "before this use.");
return err;
case -EPROTO:
verbose(env, "expected an RCU CS when using %s\n", meta->func_name);
+ bpf_diag_res(env, insn_idx, "iterator requires RCU read lock",
+ "This iterator was created for use under RCU protection, but "
+ "this path is not currently inside an RCU read lock region.",
+ "Wrap iterator use in bpf_rcu_read_lock() and "
+ "bpf_rcu_read_unlock(), keeping all exit paths balanced.");
return err;
default:
return err;
@@ -10493,6 +10629,7 @@ static int check_reference_leak(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, bool exception_exi
continue;
verbose(env, "Unreleased reference id=%d alloc_insn=%d\n",
state->refs[i].id, state->refs[i].insn_idx);
+ bpf_diag_leak(env, state->refs[i].id, state->refs[i].insn_idx, env->insn_idx);
refs_lingering = true;
}
return refs_lingering ? -EINVAL : 0;
@@ -11988,6 +12125,12 @@ static int process_irq_flag(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *
if (!is_irq_flag_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) {
verbose(env, "expected uninitialized irq flag as %s\n",
reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, env->insn_idx, "IRQ flag is already initialized",
+ "Saving IRQ state requires an uninitialized stack slot for "
+ "the IRQ flag, but this slot already contains tracked IRQ "
+ "flag state.",
+ "Use a fresh stack slot for this save operation, or restore "
+ "the existing IRQ flag before reusing the slot.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -12004,6 +12147,11 @@ static int process_irq_flag(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *
if (err) {
verbose(env, "expected an initialized irq flag as %s\n",
reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+ bpf_diag_res(env, env->insn_idx, "uninitialized IRQ flag restore",
+ "Restoring IRQ state requires a stack slot that was "
+ "initialized by a matching IRQ save operation on this path.",
+ "Pass the same stack slot that was previously initialized by "
+ "the matching IRQ save kfunc.");
return err;
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 15:38 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/17] Redesign Verification Errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/17] bpf: Add verifier diagnostics report helpers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/17] bpf: Add source and instruction diagnostic context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/17] bpf: Add verifier diagnostic event log Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/17] bpf: Prune verifier diagnostics when switching paths Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/17] bpf: Track verifier register diagnostic events Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/17] bpf: Track verifier reference " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/17] bpf: Track verifier context " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/17] bpf: Report Register Type Safety errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/17] bpf: Report Memory Safety bounds errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-07-13 16:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/17] bpf: Report Resource Lifetime reference leaks sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/17] bpf: Report Call Type Safety argument errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/17] bpf: Report Execution Context Safety errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/17] bpf: Report Program Structure CFG errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/17] bpf: Report Policy helper and kfunc errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/17] bpf: Report Verifier Limit errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/17] bpf: Report Verifier Internal errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/17] bpf: Gate verifier diagnostics on log level Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-14 3:36 ` kernel test robot
2026-07-14 6:10 ` [syzbot ci] Re: Redesign Verification Errors syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260713153910.2556007-11-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox