BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/17] bpf: Report Call Type Safety argument errors
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:51:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713155123.086141F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713153910.2556007-12-memxor@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incorrect function name reported in NULL pointer diagnostic for global subprograms
--

--- Patch [11]: [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/17] bpf: Report Call Type Safety argument errors ---
commit 42278ddf76eadbac6e7b1b29c475b084fe058a97
Author: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>

bpf: Report Call Type Safety argument errors

Augment selected helper and kfunc argument-contract failures with Call Type
Safety reports. Keep the existing terse verifier messages and add reason,
source context, causal register or stack-argument history, and targeted
suggestions.

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 84eda5e83f873..07e2c1ed8fbe6 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -8438,6 +8503,12 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *re
>  		    (!type_may_be_null(arg_type) || arg_type_is_release(arg_type))) {
>  			verbose(env, "Possibly NULL pointer passed to helper %s\n",
>  				reg_arg_name(env, argno));
> +			bpf_diag_report_call_arg(env, env->insn_idx, argno,
> +						 func_id_name(meta->func_id),
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: Medium]
Will this produce an incorrect diagnostic for global subprograms?

When `check_reg_type()` is called from `btf_check_func_arg_match()` for a global 
subprogram, `meta->func_id` is explicitly zeroed and the subprogram name is 
passed via the `call_name` parameter. By using `func_id_name(meta->func_id)` here 
instead of `call_name`, won't this result in the log message printing "unspec" 
instead of the actual global subprogram name?

> +						 "the pointer may be NULL, but this helper "
> +						 "requires a non-NULL pointer",
> +						 "Add a NULL check and call the helper only on the "
> +						 "non-NULL path.");
>  			return -EACCES;
>  		}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713153910.2556007-1-memxor@gmail.com?part=11

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-13 15:38 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/17] Redesign Verification Errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/17] bpf: Add verifier diagnostics report helpers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/17] bpf: Add source and instruction diagnostic context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/17] bpf: Add verifier diagnostic event log Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/17] bpf: Prune verifier diagnostics when switching paths Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/17] bpf: Track verifier register diagnostic events Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/17] bpf: Track verifier reference " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/17] bpf: Track verifier context " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/17] bpf: Report Register Type Safety errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/17] bpf: Report Memory Safety bounds errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/17] bpf: Report Resource Lifetime reference leaks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/17] bpf: Report Call Type Safety argument errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:51   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/17] bpf: Report Execution Context Safety errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/17] bpf: Report Program Structure CFG errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/17] bpf: Report Policy helper and kfunc errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/17] bpf: Report Verifier Limit errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/17] bpf: Report Verifier Internal errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/17] bpf: Gate verifier diagnostics on log level Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-14  3:36   ` kernel test robot
2026-07-14  6:10 ` [syzbot ci] Re: Redesign Verification Errors syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260713155123.086141F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox