From: chenyuan_fl@163.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Nuoqi Gui <gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>,
Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 14:28:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901062845.1379760-1-chenyuan_fl@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0560a24d-2cf9-4e5b-aa61-580af1e56de1@gmail.com>
From: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
v3 addresses Mykyta's review of v2 [3]. Both comments concern patch 1:
1. "Could you please double check if this is needed at all? I think
bpf_map_free_internal_structs() going to reset special fields to 0,
so immediate reuse by __bpf_async_init(), bpf_task_work_schedule()
correctly identifies fresh fields."
-> Correct: bpf_obj_cancel_fields() resets the timer/workqueue/
task_work slots in place (xchg to NULL in bpf_async_cancel_and_free()
and bpf_task_work_cancel_and_free()), so no re-initialization is
needed on reuse. rhtab_init_map_value() is dropped entirely; the
element alloc path now matches htab's non-prealloc path
(alloc_htab_elem()), which also performs no explicit init.
2. "Let's directly call bpf_obj_cancel_fields() here and below, so it
is consistent with htab."
-> Done: the rhtab_cancel_fields() wrapper is removed and
rhtab_delete_elem()/rhtab_map_update_existing() call
bpf_obj_cancel_fields() directly.
The resizable hashtab still eagerly calls bpf_obj_free_fields() on
element delete/replace, which runs kptr destructors from the caller's
execution context (unsafe in NMI). This follows the existing discussion
on RHash special-field recycling (Nuoqi Gui's series [2] and the review
[1]): patch 1 applies the cancel semantics like hash/array maps
(a3a81d247651); patch 2 fixes a program-BTF use-after-free in the
mem-alloc destructor found while testing; patches 3-4 add regression
tests (NMI update, and per-field delete/re-insert cycles).
Changes since v2 (all from Mykyta's review [3]):
* Drop rhtab_init_map_value(): bpf_obj_cancel_fields() resets the
timer/workqueue/task_work slots to zero on delete, fresh elements
come zeroed from the bpf mem allocator, and kptr slots must stay
untouched, so no re-initialization is needed (matching htab's
non-prealloc path).
* Call bpf_obj_cancel_fields() directly instead of a rhtab-specific
wrapper, consistent with htab.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/DKEVG8ZVJDDQ.2G40FTOIZKU57@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260726-f01-23-rhash-cancel-bpf-next-v1-0-6e5e1131d885@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0560a24d-2cf9-4e5b-aa61-580af1e56de1@gmail.com/
Yuan Chen (4):
bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle
bpf: Fix use-after-free of program BTF in mem-alloc destructor
selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context
selftests/bpf: Test rhtab special-field combinations
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 98 +++++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_fields.c | 337 ++++++++++++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c | 184 ++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_fields.c | 378 +++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c | 146 ++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/rhtab_fields_common.h | 19 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/rhtab_kptr_common.h | 6 +
7 files changed, 1152 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_fields.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_fields.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/rhtab_fields_common.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/rhtab_kptr_common.h
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 9:55 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 10:50 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-11 9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 11:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-11 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 16:15 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-01 6:28 ` chenyuan_fl [this message]
2026-09-01 6:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 " chenyuan_fl
2026-09-01 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 7:37 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 16:57 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-01 6:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] bpf: Fix use-after-free of program BTF in mem-alloc destructor chenyuan_fl
2026-09-01 17:10 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-01 6:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context chenyuan_fl
2026-09-01 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 7:37 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 6:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab special-field combinations chenyuan_fl
2026-09-01 6:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 7:37 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-04 10:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] bpf: Fix use-after-free of program BTF in mem-alloc destructor chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab special-field combinations chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901062845.1379760-1-chenyuan_fl@163.com \
--to=chenyuan_fl@163.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenyuan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox