BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>,
	David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] selftests/bpf: Cover record attributes in bpftool BTF dumps
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 15:26:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023222652.3927736-7-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023222652.3927736-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>

Types whose field accesses need static offsets carry __bpf_static_offset,
while their nested anonymous records must stay unannotated. Other
records retain __bpf_relocatable, including context types such as
bpf_nf_ctx whose accesses do not need static offsets.

Extend the existing C dump test fixture with selected context and
socket types and recursively nested anonymous unions.

Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
---
 .../bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected      | 24 ++++++++++
 .../bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected    | 24 ++++++++++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c         | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected
index 9166a99a6077..38cec98ddedd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected
@@ -37,6 +37,30 @@ enum {
 	E0 = 1,
 };
 
+struct __sk_buff {
+	int len;
+	union {
+		int sk;
+	};
+} __attribute__((__bpf_static_offset));
+
+struct bpf_nf_ctx {
+	int f;
+} __attribute__((__bpf_relocatable));
+
+struct bpf_sk_lookup {
+	union {
+		union {
+			int cookie;
+		};
+		int family;
+	};
+} __attribute__((__bpf_static_offset));
+
+struct bpf_tcp_sock {
+	int snd_cwnd;
+} __attribute__((__bpf_static_offset));
+
 struct holey {
 	int c;
 	long: 32;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected
index ef01a8a4e6ad..81f58181da14 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected
@@ -48,6 +48,30 @@ struct s {
 	int f;
 } __attribute__((__bpf_relocatable));
 
+struct __sk_buff {
+	int len;
+	union {
+		int sk;
+	};
+} __attribute__((__bpf_static_offset));
+
+struct bpf_sk_lookup {
+	union {
+		union {
+			int cookie;
+		};
+		int family;
+	};
+} __attribute__((__bpf_static_offset));
+
+struct bpf_tcp_sock {
+	int snd_cwnd;
+} __attribute__((__bpf_static_offset));
+
+struct bpf_nf_ctx {
+	int f;
+} __attribute__((__bpf_relocatable));
+
 
 /* BPF kfuncs */
 #ifndef BPF_NO_KFUNC_PROTOTYPES
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c
index 9104c059a315..0277f054410c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c
@@ -20,6 +20,18 @@
  *	};
  *	enum { E0 = 1 };
  *	struct s { int f; };
+ *	struct __sk_buff {
+ *		int len;
+ *		union { int sk; };
+ *	};
+ *	struct bpf_sk_lookup {
+ *		union {
+ *			union { int cookie; };
+ *			int family;
+ *		};
+ *	};
+ *	struct bpf_tcp_sock { int snd_cwnd; };
+ *	struct bpf_nf_ctx { int f; };
  */
 static struct btf *mk_btf(void)
 {
@@ -42,6 +54,25 @@ static struct btf *mk_btf(void)
 	btf__add_struct(btf, "s", 4);
 	btf__add_field(btf, "f", 1, 0, 0);
 
+	btf__add_union(btf, NULL, 4);
+	btf__add_field(btf, "sk", 1, 0, 0);
+	btf__add_struct(btf, "__sk_buff", 8);
+	btf__add_field(btf, "len", 1, 0, 0);
+	btf__add_field(btf, NULL, 6, 32, 0);
+
+	btf__add_union(btf, NULL, 4);
+	btf__add_field(btf, "cookie", 1, 0, 0);
+	btf__add_union(btf, NULL, 4);
+	btf__add_field(btf, NULL, 8, 0, 0);
+	btf__add_field(btf, "family", 1, 0, 0);
+	btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_sk_lookup", 4);
+	btf__add_field(btf, NULL, 9, 0, 0);
+
+	btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_tcp_sock", 4);
+	btf__add_field(btf, "snd_cwnd", 1, 0, 0);
+	btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_nf_ctx", 4);
+	btf__add_field(btf, "f", 1, 0, 0);
+
 	VALIDATE_RAW_BTF(
 		btf,
 		"[1] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
@@ -52,6 +83,22 @@ static struct btf *mk_btf(void)
 		"[4] ENUM '(anon)' encoding=UNSIGNED size=4 vlen=1\n"
 		"\t'E0' val=1",
 		"[5] STRUCT 's' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+		"\t'f' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+		"[6] UNION '(anon)' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+		"\t'sk' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+		"[7] STRUCT '__sk_buff' size=8 vlen=2\n"
+		"\t'len' type_id=1 bits_offset=0\n"
+		"\t'(anon)' type_id=6 bits_offset=32",
+		"[8] UNION '(anon)' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+		"\t'cookie' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+		"[9] UNION '(anon)' size=4 vlen=2\n"
+		"\t'(anon)' type_id=8 bits_offset=0\n"
+		"\t'family' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+		"[10] STRUCT 'bpf_sk_lookup' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+		"\t'(anon)' type_id=9 bits_offset=0",
+		"[11] STRUCT 'bpf_tcp_sock' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+		"\t'snd_cwnd' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+		"[12] STRUCT 'bpf_nf_ctx' size=4 vlen=1\n"
 		"\t'f' type_id=1 bits_offset=0");
 
 	return btf;
-- 
2.56.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-23 22:26 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] bpftool: Per-record CO-RE attributes in the C dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] libbpf: Look up BTF strings without making BTF modifiable Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] selftests/bpf: Cover unknown BTF header-extension bytes in btf dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] bpftool: Apply __bpf_relocatable per record on BTF dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 18:03   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-27 18:15     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 18:21       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-27 18:26         ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 21:25           ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] bpftool: Skip __bpf_relocatable on verifier-rewritten context types Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 18:06   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-27 18:10     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-27 18:17     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] bpftool: Emit __bpf_static_offset " Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 18:10   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-23 22:26 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] selftests/bpf: Cover context and socket accesses through vmlinux.h Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] bpftool: Document __bpf_relocatable and __bpf_static_offset Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] bpftool: Per-record CO-RE attributes in the C dump Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261023222652.3927736-7-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox