From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>,
David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] bpftool: Skip __bpf_relocatable on verifier-rewritten context types
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 11:17:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5718c42b-6cc5-4816-9b67-2a22ddd7f416@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bza2KV8ZbV2eeGyNabErZ43gY+md4WP6N7XPVL0_dw-mAA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/27/26 11:06 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 3:27 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Anonymous records within types that need static offsets must not start
>> + * CO-RE access chains. Named records, typedefs and pointer targets are
>> + * separate types.
>> + */
>> +static void btf_c_mark_no_pai(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id, unsigned long *no_pai)
>
> mark_static_offset to keep terminology consistent?
>
>> +{
>> + const struct btf_type *t = btf__type_by_id(btf, id);
>> + const struct btf_member *m = btf_members(t);
>> + __u32 i;
>> +
>> + __set_bit(id, no_pai);
>> + for (i = 0; i < btf_vlen(t); i++, m++) {
>> + const struct btf_type *mt;
>> + __u32 mid = m->type;
>> +
>> + mt = btf__type_by_id(btf, mid);
>> + while (btf_is_array(mt) || btf_is_mod(mt)) {
>> + mid = btf_is_array(mt) ? btf_array(mt)->type : mt->type;
>> + mt = btf__type_by_id(btf, mid);
>> + }
>> + if (btf_is_composite(mt) && !mt->name_off && !test_bit(mid, no_pai))
>> + btf_c_mark_no_pai(btf, mid, no_pai);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static int btf_c_annotate_records(struct btf *btf)
>> {
>> __u32 i, cnt = btf__type_cnt(btf);
>> + unsigned long *no_pai;
>> int err;
>>
>> + no_pai = bitmap_zalloc(cnt);
>
> this will cause problems for github mirror that won't have access to
> linux-internal include/linux/bitmap.h,
Good point, haven't thought of that.
> ...I'd just open-code a simple
> bitmap or use bool array for simplicity, memory usage increase doesn't
> really matter here
>
>> + if (!no_pai)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 1; i < cnt; i++) {
>> + if (btf_c_needs_static_offset(btf, btf__type_by_id(btf, i)))
>> + btf_c_mark_no_pai(btf, i, no_pai);
>> + }
>> +
>> for (i = 1; i < cnt; i++) {
>> const struct btf_type *t = btf__type_by_id(btf, i);
>>
>> if (!btf_is_composite(t))
>> continue;
>> + if (test_bit(i, no_pai))
>> + continue;
>> err = btf__add_decl_attr(btf, "__bpf_relocatable", i, -1);
>> if (err < 0)
>> - return err;
>> + goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + err = 0;
>> +out:
>> + bitmap_free(no_pai);
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> static int dump_btf_c(struct btf *btf,
>> --
>> 2.56.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 22:26 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] bpftool: Per-record CO-RE attributes in the C dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] libbpf: Look up BTF strings without making BTF modifiable Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] selftests/bpf: Cover unknown BTF header-extension bytes in btf dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] bpftool: Apply __bpf_relocatable per record on BTF dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 18:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-27 18:15 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 18:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-27 18:26 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 21:25 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] bpftool: Skip __bpf_relocatable on verifier-rewritten context types Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 18:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-27 18:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-27 18:17 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] bpftool: Emit __bpf_static_offset " Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-27 18:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] selftests/bpf: Cover record attributes in bpftool BTF dumps Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] selftests/bpf: Cover context and socket accesses through vmlinux.h Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] bpftool: Document __bpf_relocatable and __bpf_static_offset Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-23 22:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] bpftool: Per-record CO-RE attributes in the C dump Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5718c42b-6cc5-4816-9b67-2a22ddd7f416@linux.dev \
--to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox