From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify definitions of various instructions
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68a15df5-dbb8-481a-812e-2b361dc2a915@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240126040050.8464-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com>
On 1/25/24 8:00 PM, Dave Thaler wrote:
> Clarify definitions of several instructions:
> * BPF_NEG does not support BPF_X
> * BPF_CALL does not support BPF_JMP32 or BPF_X
> * BPF_EXIT does not support BPF_X
> * BPF_JA does not support BPF_X (was implied but not explicitly stated)
>
> Also fix a typo in the wide instruction figure where
> the field is actually named "opcode" not "code".
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify definitions of various instructions
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:12:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68a15df5-dbb8-481a-812e-2b361dc2a915@linux.dev> (raw)
Message-ID: <20240126051216.vs3sgPAIIWj7qUUSkt1qPJKRyguHVESa7w9JYcgws9k@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240126040050.8464-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com>
On 1/25/24 8:00 PM, Dave Thaler wrote:
> Clarify definitions of several instructions:
> * BPF_NEG does not support BPF_X
> * BPF_CALL does not support BPF_JMP32 or BPF_X
> * BPF_EXIT does not support BPF_X
> * BPF_JA does not support BPF_X (was implied but not explicitly stated)
>
> Also fix a typo in the wide instruction figure where
> the field is actually named "opcode" not "code".
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
--
Bpf mailing list
Bpf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-26 4:00 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify definitions of various instructions Dave Thaler
2024-01-26 4:00 ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2024-01-26 5:12 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-01-26 5:12 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-26 18:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68a15df5-dbb8-481a-812e-2b361dc2a915@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=bpf@ietf.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dthaler1968@gmail.com \
--cc=dthaler1968@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox