BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau	 <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song	 <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] bpf: attribute __arg_untrusted for global function parameters
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 14:25:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e8e074d1b76565acf251033fcb963cd7417741e.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLRL8Vuh_VGAqSF_MhcsHhOvfYFurGoGiC9RfAiGJcbZQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2025-07-02 at 20:18 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 3:42 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

> > @@ -7818,6 +7821,22 @@ int btf_prepare_func_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
> >                         sub->args[i].btf_id = kern_type_id;
> >                         continue;
> >                 }
> > +               if (tags & ARG_TAG_UNTRUSTED) {
> > +                       int kern_type_id;
> > +
> > +                       if (tags & ~ARG_TAG_UNTRUSTED) {
> > +                               bpf_log(log, "arg#%d untrusted cannot be combined with any other tags\n", i);
> > +                               return -EINVAL;
> > +                       }
> > +
> > +                       kern_type_id = btf_get_ptr_to_btf_id(log, i, btf, t);
> > +                       if (kern_type_id < 0)
> > +                               return kern_type_id;
> > +
> > +                       sub->args[i].arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED;
> > +                       sub->args[i].btf_id = kern_type_id;
> > +                       continue;
> > +               }
> 
> Looking at this hunk standalone (without patch 7) one might get
> an impression that odd ptr_to_btf_id is allowed that points
> to non-struct type,
> but patch 7 sort-of fixes it by handling primitive types first.
> 
> Still, I think it would be good to add a check here that kern_type_id
> is a struct kind.

I'm adding this check, but it will go w/o a test:
- unions are allowed by btf_struct_walk, so need to be accepted
- function types are anonymous and candidates search wants types with names
- float -- no candidate in kernel btf
- func/var/datasec -- need a corrupt BTF to sneak these in.

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-03 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-02 22:42 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] bpf: additional use-cases for untrusted PTR_TO_MEM Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-02 22:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf: make makr_btf_ld_reg return error for unexpected reg types Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 17:20   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-02 22:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf: rdonly_untrusted_mem for btf id walk pointer leafs Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 17:27   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-02 22:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] selftests/bpf: ptr_to_btf_id struct walk ending with primitive pointer Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 17:34   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-02 22:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] bpf: attribute __arg_untrusted for global function parameters Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-03  3:18   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-03 21:25     ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-07-04 18:17       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-04 18:03   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-04 18:28     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 18:33       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 18:50         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-04 19:07           ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 19:15             ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-04 19:23               ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 20:05                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-04 20:20                   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-04 20:34                     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 20:47                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-02 22:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] libbpf: __arg_untrusted in bpf_helpers.h Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 18:04   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-02 22:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: test cases for __arg_untrusted Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 18:05   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-02 22:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] bpf: support for void/primitive __arg_untrusted global func params Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-03  3:20   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-03 21:49     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 18:11       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-04 18:09   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-02 22:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: tests for __arg_untrusted void * " Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 18:12   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-07-04 18:35     ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e8e074d1b76565acf251033fcb963cd7417741e.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox