From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86,retpoline: Be sure to emit INT3 after JMP *%\reg
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:04:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yxm+QkFPOhrVSH6q@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yxm2QU1NJIkIyrrU@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:30:41AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Let me go do a patch.
---
Subject: x86,retpoline: Be sure to emit INT3 after JMP *%\reg
Both AMD and Intel recommend using INT3 after an indirect JMP. Make sure
to emit one when rewriting the retpoline JMP irrespective of compiler
SLS options or even CONFIG_SLS.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 9 +++++++++
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 62f6b8b7c4a5..68d84cf8e001 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -453,6 +453,15 @@ static int patch_retpoline(void *addr, struct insn *insn, u8 *bytes)
return ret;
i += ret;
+ /*
+ * The compiler is supposed to EMIT an INT3 after every unconditional
+ * JMP instruction due to AMD BTC. However, if the compiler is too old
+ * or SLS isn't enabled, we still need an INT3 after indirect JMPs
+ * even on Intel.
+ */
+ if (op == JMP32_INSN_OPCODE && i < insn->length)
+ bytes[i++] = INT3_INSN_OPCODE;
+
for (; i < insn->length;)
bytes[i++] = BYTES_NOP1;
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index c1f6c1c51d99..37f821dee68f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -419,7 +419,8 @@ static void emit_indirect_jump(u8 **pprog, int reg, u8 *ip)
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(reg);
emit_jump(&prog, &__x86_indirect_thunk_array[reg], ip);
} else {
- EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE0 + reg);
+ EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE0 + reg); /* jmp *%\reg */
+ EMIT1(0xCC); /* int3 */
}
*pprog = prog;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-08 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-08 1:34 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-08 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-08 5:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-09-08 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-08 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-09-08 14:01 ` [PATCH] x86,retpoline: Be sure to emit INT3 after JMP *%\reg Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-09 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 14:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-09 16:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-09-11 15:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-08 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-08 13:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-08 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-08 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-08 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe optimization " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-12-15 3:31 ` Nadav Amit
2022-12-18 14:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-08 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Josh Poimboeuf
2022-09-08 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe optimization check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yxm+QkFPOhrVSH6q@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox