BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error
@ 2022-02-17 19:40 Yonghong Song
  2022-02-17 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-02-20  0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2022-02-17 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf; +Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team

Build the kernel and selftest with clang compiler with LLVM=1,
  make -j LLVM=1
  make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf -j LLVM=1

I hit the following selftests/bpf compilation error:
  In file included from test_cpp.cpp:3:
  /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:73:8:
    error: 'relaxed_core_relocs' is deprecated: libbpf v0.6+: field has no effect [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-declarations]
  struct bpf_object_open_opts {
         ^
  test_cpp.cpp:56:2: note: in implicit move constructor for 'bpf_object_open_opts' first required here
          LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
          ^
  /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:77:3: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_OPTS'
                  (struct TYPE) {                                             \
                  ^
  /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:90:2: note: 'relaxed_core_relocs' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
          LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "field has no effect")
          ^
  /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:24:4: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE'
                  (LIBBPF_DEPRECATED("libbpf v" # major "." # minor "+: " msg))
                   ^
  /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:19:47: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED'
  #define LIBBPF_DEPRECATED(msg) __attribute__((deprecated(msg)))

There are two ways to fix the issue, one is to use GCC diagnostic ignore pragma, and the
other is to open code bpf_object_open_opts instead of using LIBBPF_OPTS.
Since in general LIBBPF_OPTS is preferred, the patch fixed the issue by
adding proper GCC diagnostic ignore pragmas.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
index 773f165c4898..19ad172036da 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) */
 #include <iostream>
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/btf.h>
 #include "test_core_extern.skel.h"
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error
  2022-02-17 19:40 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error Yonghong Song
@ 2022-02-17 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-02-17 23:55   ` Yonghong Song
  2022-02-20  0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-02-17 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yonghong Song
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann,
	Kernel Team

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:40 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Build the kernel and selftest with clang compiler with LLVM=1,
>   make -j LLVM=1
>   make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf -j LLVM=1
>
> I hit the following selftests/bpf compilation error:
>   In file included from test_cpp.cpp:3:
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:73:8:
>     error: 'relaxed_core_relocs' is deprecated: libbpf v0.6+: field has no effect [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-declarations]
>   struct bpf_object_open_opts {
>          ^
>   test_cpp.cpp:56:2: note: in implicit move constructor for 'bpf_object_open_opts' first required here
>           LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
>           ^
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:77:3: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_OPTS'
>                   (struct TYPE) {                                             \
>                   ^
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:90:2: note: 'relaxed_core_relocs' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
>           LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "field has no effect")
>           ^
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:24:4: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE'
>                   (LIBBPF_DEPRECATED("libbpf v" # major "." # minor "+: " msg))
>                    ^
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:19:47: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED'
>   #define LIBBPF_DEPRECATED(msg) __attribute__((deprecated(msg)))
>
> There are two ways to fix the issue, one is to use GCC diagnostic ignore pragma, and the
> other is to open code bpf_object_open_opts instead of using LIBBPF_OPTS.
> Since in general LIBBPF_OPTS is preferred, the patch fixed the issue by
> adding proper GCC diagnostic ignore pragmas.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> ---

Do you know why we see this only with Clang? Why GCC doesn't generate this?


>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
> index 773f165c4898..19ad172036da 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
> @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
>  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) */
>  #include <iostream>
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
>  #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>  #include <bpf/bpf.h>
>  #include <bpf/btf.h>
>  #include "test_core_extern.skel.h"
> --
> 2.30.2
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error
  2022-02-17 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-02-17 23:55   ` Yonghong Song
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2022-02-17 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann,
	Kernel Team



On 2/17/22 1:59 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:40 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>> Build the kernel and selftest with clang compiler with LLVM=1,
>>    make -j LLVM=1
>>    make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf -j LLVM=1
>>
>> I hit the following selftests/bpf compilation error:
>>    In file included from test_cpp.cpp:3:
>>    /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:73:8:
>>      error: 'relaxed_core_relocs' is deprecated: libbpf v0.6+: field has no effect [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-declarations]
>>    struct bpf_object_open_opts {
>>           ^
>>    test_cpp.cpp:56:2: note: in implicit move constructor for 'bpf_object_open_opts' first required here
>>            LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
>>            ^
>>    /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:77:3: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_OPTS'
>>                    (struct TYPE) {                                             \
>>                    ^
>>    /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:90:2: note: 'relaxed_core_relocs' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
>>            LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "field has no effect")
>>            ^
>>    /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:24:4: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE'
>>                    (LIBBPF_DEPRECATED("libbpf v" # major "." # minor "+: " msg))
>>                     ^
>>    /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:19:47: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED'
>>    #define LIBBPF_DEPRECATED(msg) __attribute__((deprecated(msg)))
>>
>> There are two ways to fix the issue, one is to use GCC diagnostic ignore pragma, and the
>> other is to open code bpf_object_open_opts instead of using LIBBPF_OPTS.
>> Since in general LIBBPF_OPTS is preferred, the patch fixed the issue by
>> adding proper GCC diagnostic ignore pragmas.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>> ---
> 
> Do you know why we see this only with Clang? Why GCC doesn't generate this?

Not a gcc internal expert. But I guess gcc didn't look into struct field 
deprecated attribute.

The following is a simpler reproducer. The structure initialization
in the code means the compiler needs to initialize each named field
with either default value (0) or provided value. If one of fields
is marked as deprecated, the compiler can emit warning message since
that field is accessed.

[$ ~/tmp3] cat t.cc
struct bpf_object_open_opts {
         long sz;
         const char *objname;
         int relax_maps;
         int relaxed_core_relocs __attribute__((deprecated("msg")));
         const char *pin_root_path;
};

void foo(void *);
int test(void) {
         struct bpf_object_open_opts tmp = (struct bpf_object_open_opts) 
{ .sz = 2, };
         foo(&tmp);
         return 0;
}

[$ ~/tmp3] clang++ -c -g t.cc -Wall -Werror
t.cc:1:8: error: 'relaxed_core_relocs' is deprecated: msg 
[-Werror,-Wdeprecated-declarations]
struct bpf_object_open_opts {
        ^
t.cc:11:43: note: in implicit move constructor for 
'bpf_object_open_opts' first required here
         struct bpf_object_open_opts tmp = (struct bpf_object_open_opts) 
{ .sz = 2, };
                                           ^
t.cc:5:41: note: 'relaxed_core_relocs' has been explicitly marked 
deprecated here
         int relaxed_core_relocs __attribute__((deprecated("msg")));
                                                ^
1 error generated.
[$ ~/tmp3] g++ -c -g t.cc -Wall -Werror
[$ ~/tmp3] g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.5.0 20210514 (Red Hat 8.5.0-3)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

[$ ~/tmp3]

> 
> 
>>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
>> index 773f165c4898..19ad172036da 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
>> @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
>>   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) */
>>   #include <iostream>
>> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
>> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
>>   #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
>> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>>   #include <bpf/bpf.h>
>>   #include <bpf/btf.h>
>>   #include "test_core_extern.skel.h"
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error
  2022-02-17 19:40 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error Yonghong Song
  2022-02-17 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-02-20  0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-02-20  0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yonghong Song; +Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, kernel-team

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:40:05 -0800 you wrote:
> Build the kernel and selftest with clang compiler with LLVM=1,
>   make -j LLVM=1
>   make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf -j LLVM=1
> 
> I hit the following selftests/bpf compilation error:
>   In file included from test_cpp.cpp:3:
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:73:8:
>     error: 'relaxed_core_relocs' is deprecated: libbpf v0.6+: field has no effect [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-declarations]
>   struct bpf_object_open_opts {
>          ^
>   test_cpp.cpp:56:2: note: in implicit move constructor for 'bpf_object_open_opts' first required here
>           LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
>           ^
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:77:3: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_OPTS'
>                   (struct TYPE) {                                             \
>                   ^
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:90:2: note: 'relaxed_core_relocs' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
>           LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "field has no effect")
>           ^
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:24:4: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE'
>                   (LIBBPF_DEPRECATED("libbpf v" # major "." # minor "+: " msg))
>                    ^
>   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:19:47: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED'
>   #define LIBBPF_DEPRECATED(msg) __attribute__((deprecated(msg)))
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a33c0c792d0a

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-20  0:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-17 19:40 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error Yonghong Song
2022-02-17 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-17 23:55   ` Yonghong Song
2022-02-20  0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox