From: Ben Pfaff <blp@ovn.org>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next] net: remove abuse of VLAN DEI/CFI bit
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:55:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161205185545.GB3129@ovn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161205172436.cpxohof6rggxid74@rere.qmqm.pl>
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:24:36PM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 03:27:30PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:22:28AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > This All-in-one patch removes abuse of VLAN CFI bit, so it can be passed
> > > intact through linux networking stack.
> > This appears to change the established Open vSwitch userspace API. You
> > can see that simply from the way that it changes the documentation for
> > the userspace API. If I'm right about that, then this change will break
> > all userspace programs that use the Open vSwitch kernel module,
> > including Open vSwitch itself.
>
> If I understood the code correctly, it does change expected meaning for
> the (unlikely?) case of header truncated just before the VLAN TCI - it will
> be impossible to differentiate this case from the VLAN TCI == 0.
>
> I guess this is a problem with OVS API, because it doesn't directly show
> the "missing" state of elements, but relies on an "invalid" value.
That particular corner case should not be a huge problem in any case.
The real problem is that this appears to break the common case use of
VLANs in Open vSwitch. After this patch, parse_vlan() in
net/openvswitch/flow.c copies the tpid and tci from sk_buff (either the
accelerated version of them or the version in the skb data) into
sw_flow_key members. OK, that's fine on it's own. However, I don't see
any corresponding change to the code in flow_netlink.c to compensate for
the fact that, until now, the VLAN CFI bit (formerly VLAN_TAG_PRESENT)
was always required to be set to 1 in flow matches inside Netlink
messages sent from userspace, and the kernel always set it to 1 in
corresponding messages sent to userspace.
In other words, if I'm reading this change correctly:
* With a kernel before this change, userspace always had to set
VLAN_TAG_PRESENT to 1 to match on a VLAN, or the kernel would
reject the flow match.
* With a kernel after this change, userspace must not set
VLAN_TAG_PRESENT to 1, otherwise the kernel will accept the flow
match but nothing will ever match because packets do not actually
have the CFI bit set.
Take a look at this code that the patch deletes from
validate_vlan_from_nlattrs(), for example, and see how it insisted that
VLAN_TAG_PRESENT was set:
if (!(tci & htons(VLAN_TAG_PRESENT))) {
if (tci) {
OVS_NLERR(log, "%s TCI does not have VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit set.",
(inner) ? "C-VLAN" : "VLAN");
return -EINVAL;
} else if (nla_len(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_ENCAP])) {
/* Corner case for truncated VLAN header. */
OVS_NLERR(log, "Truncated %s header has non-zero encap attribute.",
(inner) ? "C-VLAN" : "VLAN");
return -EINVAL;
}
}
Please let me know if I'm overlooking something.
Thanks,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-05 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-03 9:22 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] net: remove abuse of VLAN DEI/CFI bit Michał Mirosław
2016-12-03 23:27 ` [Bridge] [ovs-dev] " Ben Pfaff
2016-12-05 17:24 ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-05 18:55 ` Ben Pfaff [this message]
2016-12-05 22:52 ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-06 0:59 ` Ben Pfaff
2016-12-14 1:21 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2016-12-14 2:03 ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-14 2:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-14 14:28 ` Michał Mirosław
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161205185545.GB3129@ovn.org \
--to=blp@ovn.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox