Ethernet Bridge development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Pfaff <blp@ovn.org>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next] net: remove abuse of VLAN DEI/CFI bit
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:59:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161206005949.GM3129@ovn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161205225247.e3dd6dcw3ryjjlp2@rere.qmqm.pl>

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:52:47PM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:55:45AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:24:36PM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 03:27:30PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:22:28AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > > > This All-in-one patch removes abuse of VLAN CFI bit, so it can be passed
> > > > > intact through linux networking stack.
> > > > This appears to change the established Open vSwitch userspace API.  You
> > > > can see that simply from the way that it changes the documentation for
> > > > the userspace API.  If I'm right about that, then this change will break
> > > > all userspace programs that use the Open vSwitch kernel module,
> > > > including Open vSwitch itself.
> > > 
> > > If I understood the code correctly, it does change expected meaning for
> > > the (unlikely?) case of header truncated just before the VLAN TCI - it will
> > > be impossible to differentiate this case from the VLAN TCI == 0.
> > > 
> > > I guess this is a problem with OVS API, because it doesn't directly show
> > > the "missing" state of elements, but relies on an "invalid" value.
> > 
> > That particular corner case should not be a huge problem in any case.
> > 
> > The real problem is that this appears to break the common case use of
> > VLANs in Open vSwitch.  After this patch, parse_vlan() in
> > net/openvswitch/flow.c copies the tpid and tci from sk_buff (either the
> > accelerated version of them or the version in the skb data) into
> > sw_flow_key members.  OK, that's fine on it's own.  However, I don't see
> > any corresponding change to the code in flow_netlink.c to compensate for
> > the fact that, until now, the VLAN CFI bit (formerly VLAN_TAG_PRESENT)
> > was always required to be set to 1 in flow matches inside Netlink
> > messages sent from userspace, and the kernel always set it to 1 in
> > corresponding messages sent to userspace.
> > 
> > In other words, if I'm reading this change correctly:
> > 
> >     * With a kernel before this change, userspace always had to set
> >       VLAN_TAG_PRESENT to 1 to match on a VLAN, or the kernel would
> >       reject the flow match.
> > 
> >     * With a kernel after this change, userspace must not set
> >       VLAN_TAG_PRESENT to 1, otherwise the kernel will accept the flow
> >       match but nothing will ever match because packets do not actually
> >       have the CFI bit set.
> > 
> > Take a look at this code that the patch deletes from
> > validate_vlan_from_nlattrs(), for example, and see how it insisted that
> > VLAN_TAG_PRESENT was set:
> > 
> > 	if (!(tci & htons(VLAN_TAG_PRESENT))) {
> > 		if (tci) {
> > 			OVS_NLERR(log, "%s TCI does not have VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit set.",
> > 				  (inner) ? "C-VLAN" : "VLAN");
> > 			return -EINVAL;
> > 		} else if (nla_len(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_ENCAP])) {
> > 			/* Corner case for truncated VLAN header. */
> > 			OVS_NLERR(log, "Truncated %s header has non-zero encap attribute.",
> > 				  (inner) ? "C-VLAN" : "VLAN");
> > 			return -EINVAL;
> > 		}
> > 	}
> > 
> > Please let me know if I'm overlooking something.
> 
> Hmm. So the easiest change without disrupting current userspace, would be
> to flip the CFI bit on the way to/from OVS userspace. Does this seem
> correct?

That sounds correct.  (The bit should not be flipped in the mask.)

Thanks,

Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-06  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-03  9:22 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] net: remove abuse of VLAN DEI/CFI bit Michał Mirosław
2016-12-03 23:27 ` [Bridge] [ovs-dev] " Ben Pfaff
2016-12-05 17:24   ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-05 18:55     ` Ben Pfaff
2016-12-05 22:52       ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-06  0:59         ` Ben Pfaff [this message]
2016-12-14  1:21 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2016-12-14  2:03   ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-14  2:21     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-14 14:28   ` Michał Mirosław

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161206005949.GM3129@ovn.org \
    --to=blp@ovn.org \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox