From: Ben Pfaff <blp@ovn.org>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next] net: remove abuse of VLAN DEI/CFI bit
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:59:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161206005949.GM3129@ovn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161205225247.e3dd6dcw3ryjjlp2@rere.qmqm.pl>
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:52:47PM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:55:45AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:24:36PM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 03:27:30PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 10:22:28AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > > > This All-in-one patch removes abuse of VLAN CFI bit, so it can be passed
> > > > > intact through linux networking stack.
> > > > This appears to change the established Open vSwitch userspace API. You
> > > > can see that simply from the way that it changes the documentation for
> > > > the userspace API. If I'm right about that, then this change will break
> > > > all userspace programs that use the Open vSwitch kernel module,
> > > > including Open vSwitch itself.
> > >
> > > If I understood the code correctly, it does change expected meaning for
> > > the (unlikely?) case of header truncated just before the VLAN TCI - it will
> > > be impossible to differentiate this case from the VLAN TCI == 0.
> > >
> > > I guess this is a problem with OVS API, because it doesn't directly show
> > > the "missing" state of elements, but relies on an "invalid" value.
> >
> > That particular corner case should not be a huge problem in any case.
> >
> > The real problem is that this appears to break the common case use of
> > VLANs in Open vSwitch. After this patch, parse_vlan() in
> > net/openvswitch/flow.c copies the tpid and tci from sk_buff (either the
> > accelerated version of them or the version in the skb data) into
> > sw_flow_key members. OK, that's fine on it's own. However, I don't see
> > any corresponding change to the code in flow_netlink.c to compensate for
> > the fact that, until now, the VLAN CFI bit (formerly VLAN_TAG_PRESENT)
> > was always required to be set to 1 in flow matches inside Netlink
> > messages sent from userspace, and the kernel always set it to 1 in
> > corresponding messages sent to userspace.
> >
> > In other words, if I'm reading this change correctly:
> >
> > * With a kernel before this change, userspace always had to set
> > VLAN_TAG_PRESENT to 1 to match on a VLAN, or the kernel would
> > reject the flow match.
> >
> > * With a kernel after this change, userspace must not set
> > VLAN_TAG_PRESENT to 1, otherwise the kernel will accept the flow
> > match but nothing will ever match because packets do not actually
> > have the CFI bit set.
> >
> > Take a look at this code that the patch deletes from
> > validate_vlan_from_nlattrs(), for example, and see how it insisted that
> > VLAN_TAG_PRESENT was set:
> >
> > if (!(tci & htons(VLAN_TAG_PRESENT))) {
> > if (tci) {
> > OVS_NLERR(log, "%s TCI does not have VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit set.",
> > (inner) ? "C-VLAN" : "VLAN");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > } else if (nla_len(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_ENCAP])) {
> > /* Corner case for truncated VLAN header. */
> > OVS_NLERR(log, "Truncated %s header has non-zero encap attribute.",
> > (inner) ? "C-VLAN" : "VLAN");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Please let me know if I'm overlooking something.
>
> Hmm. So the easiest change without disrupting current userspace, would be
> to flip the CFI bit on the way to/from OVS userspace. Does this seem
> correct?
That sounds correct. (The bit should not be flipped in the mask.)
Thanks,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-06 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-03 9:22 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] net: remove abuse of VLAN DEI/CFI bit Michał Mirosław
2016-12-03 23:27 ` [Bridge] [ovs-dev] " Ben Pfaff
2016-12-05 17:24 ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-05 18:55 ` Ben Pfaff
2016-12-05 22:52 ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-06 0:59 ` Ben Pfaff [this message]
2016-12-14 1:21 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2016-12-14 2:03 ` Michał Mirosław
2016-12-14 2:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-14 14:28 ` Michał Mirosław
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161206005949.GM3129@ovn.org \
--to=blp@ovn.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox