From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot maintainer and stable releases
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:09:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1231268970.32308.230.camel@elrond.atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873afwnu6n.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
tis 2009-01-06 klockan 19:52 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Lundquist <lists@zelow.no> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> Maybe. I would just start with the rm .config; make menuconf, select
> >> arch, save; make
>
> Thomas> It's a start of course but is the resulting .config a good
> Thomas> config or just more or less random?
>
> Hopefully good - It's the default config of everything, just like any
> new user would see it. If anything is not sensible then we should
> change the defaults.
>
> Thomas> (BTW; WCHAR and LOCALE OFF is NOT a special case, it should
> Thomas> be default. In my view, also LARGEFILE.)
> >>
> >> You mean default on? They currently default to off, simply because of
> >> their size impact.
>
> Thomas> Default OFF. I haven't messed with g++ lately but it had a tendency
> Thomas> to not work without WCHAR ON. It may be back in 3.X days though.
>
> It work for me here on PPC (gcc 4.2.x / 4.3.x).
>
> Thomas> LARGEFILE set to off is another option I'd like to have as a test
> Thomas> case but I have a slight feeling that will hinder a release
> Thomas> for quite some time..
>
> WCHAR, LOCALE and LARGEFILE all defaults to off, so that's imho a
> pretty well tested.
I have been running with them on for a long time, since
when I last tried them OFF, there were a lot of packages
which did seemed to require at least WCHAR to build properly for ARM.
There are nice advantages if these packages could be made
to run without WHCAR of course.
A typical issue that pops up from time to time is that
people build the toolchain with a certain configuration
and then finds that they need a different configurtion
to build a package, and do not realize that they
need to rebuild the toolchain for the changes to take effect.
It would be good to resolve this, and this is why I have
proposed to separate toolchain build.
With SYSROOT in gcc-4 there is really no reason
to induce people to rebuild the toolchain,
and we might want to support downloading a binary toolchain as well.
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>,
BR
Ulf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 21:18 [Buildroot] Buildroot maintainer and stable releases Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-06 12:02 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-06 12:39 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-06 12:55 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-06 15:32 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-06 12:44 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 3:09 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-07 8:08 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 8:27 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 8:31 ` Nigel Kukard
2009-01-07 12:19 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-07 13:02 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 14:01 ` Thiago A. Corrêa
2009-01-08 17:50 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-08 18:29 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-08 20:28 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-08 21:05 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-08 22:06 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-08 22:33 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-08 23:13 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-09 9:15 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-09 9:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 11:13 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-07 11:28 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 12:10 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-07 12:24 ` Nigel Kukard
2009-01-07 12:57 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 18:13 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-07 19:16 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-07 19:39 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-08 8:25 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-08 9:10 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 11:50 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-07 11:54 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 12:55 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-06 14:01 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-06 15:08 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-06 18:32 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-06 18:52 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-06 19:09 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
2009-01-06 19:23 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 18:43 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-07 19:26 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-07 20:22 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-07 20:31 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-08 8:27 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-08 9:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-08 10:02 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-07 23:42 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-08 9:00 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-06 14:52 ` Nigel Kukard
2009-01-06 15:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-08 21:00 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-01-06 18:22 ` Thiago A. Corrêa
2009-01-06 18:33 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-06 18:53 ` Thiago A. Corrêa
2009-01-06 18:55 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-06 19:19 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-06 19:02 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-06 19:16 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-06 20:49 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-07 11:29 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 12:34 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-07 13:15 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 18:02 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-07 19:13 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-07 19:36 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 20:36 ` Joe George
2009-01-07 20:47 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-07 23:28 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-08 8:07 ` Thomas Lundquist
2009-01-08 19:22 ` Steve Calfee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1231268970.32308.230.camel@elrond.atmel.com \
--to=ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox