[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[ulf at uclibc.org]

Author: ulf
Date: 2009-01-29 09:33:25 +0000 (Thu, 29 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 25114

Log:
Update atstk100x BSP

Added:
   trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/atstk100x/atstk100x-linux-2.6.27.12.config
   trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/atstk100x/atstk100x-linux-2.6.27.3.config

Modified:
   trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/atstk100x/atstk100x_defconfig
   trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/uClibc.config.avr32


Changeset:

Sorry, the patch is too large to include (2762 lines).
Please use ViewCVS to see it!

http://uclibc.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=svn&rev=25114

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "ulf" == ulf  <ulf@uclibc.org> writes:

 ulf> Author: ulf
 ulf> Date: 2009-01-29 09:33:25 +0000 (Thu, 29 Jan 2009)
 ulf> New Revision: 25114

 ulf> Log:
 ulf> Update atstk100x BSP

 ulf> Added:
 ulf>    trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/atstk100x/atstk100x-linux-2.6.27.12.config
 ulf>    trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/atstk100x/atstk100x-linux-2.6.27.3.config

Too configs for practically the same kernel version? That doesn't
sound right.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Hans-Christian Egtvedt]

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:38:14 +0100
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:

> >>>>> "ulf" == ulf  <ulf@uclibc.org> writes:

<snipp>

>  ulf>    trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/atstk100x/atstk100x-linux-2.6.27.12.config
>  ulf>    trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/atstk100x/atstk100x-linux-2.6.27.3.config
> 
> Too configs for practically the same kernel version? That doesn't
> sound right.
> 

You can do "make atstk1005_defconfig" and similar for most of the AVR32
boards. The defconfig in the kernel is quite sane.

-- 
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:

 >> Too configs for practically the same kernel version? That doesn't
 >> sound right.
 >> 

 Hans-Christian> You can do "make atstk1005_defconfig" and similar for
 Hans-Christian> most of the AVR32 boards. The defconfig in the kernel
 Hans-Christian> is quite sane.

So in other words these files should go away?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Hans-Christian Egtvedt]

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:52:58 +0100
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:

> >>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt
> >>>>> <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:
> 
>  >> Too configs for practically the same kernel version? That doesn't
>  >> sound right.
>  >> 
> 
>  Hans-Christian> You can do "make atstk1005_defconfig" and similar for
>  Hans-Christian> most of the AVR32 boards. The defconfig in the kernel
>  Hans-Christian> is quite sane.
> 
> So in other words these files should go away?
> 

A kernel config is only needed for the ngw100-base board, if that is
present in the upstream BR. I use the advanced Linux make stuff to grab
the kernel config from the already included defconfigs.

-- 
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Ulf Samuelsson]

tor 2009-01-29 klockan 10:52 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:
> 
>  >> Too configs for practically the same kernel version? That doesn't
>  >> sound right.
>  >> 
> 
>  Hans-Christian> You can do "make atstk1005_defconfig" and similar for
>  Hans-Christian> most of the AVR32 boards. The defconfig in the kernel
>  Hans-Christian> is quite sane.
> 
> So in other words these files should go away?
> 

These are example projects and the user is likely
to want to do things which are specific for his/her kernel.

That is easier to do if you set buildroot to use a configuration file.

If you set buildroot to use make defconfig, then the user
has to change some other configurations in buildroot
to allow change of configuration.

The way buildroot now works is that it will seek
for a config version which is smaller or equal 
to that of the current kernel.

It is probably safe to remove the 2.6.7.3

BR
Ulf Samuelsson.

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Hans-Christian Egtvedt]

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:01:10 +0100
Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com> wrote:

> tor 2009-01-29 klockan 10:52 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> > >>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt
> > >>>>> <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:
> > 
> >  >> Too configs for practically the same kernel version? That
> >  >> doesn't sound right.
> >  >> 
> > 
> >  Hans-Christian> You can do "make atstk1005_defconfig" and similar
> > for Hans-Christian> most of the AVR32 boards. The defconfig in the
> > kernel Hans-Christian> is quite sane.
> > 
> > So in other words these files should go away?
> > 
> 
> These are example projects and the user is likely
> to want to do things which are specific for his/her kernel.
> 
> That is easier to do if you set buildroot to use a configuration file.
> 

Why?

make linux26-menuconfig works fine.

> If you set buildroot to use make defconfig, then the user
> has to change some other configurations in buildroot
> to allow change of configuration.
> 

Nope, see above.

> The way buildroot now works is that it will seek
> for a config version which is smaller or equal 
> to that of the current kernel.
> 
> It is probably safe to remove the 2.6.7.3
> 

Hmm, sure, did that have anything to do with the AVR32 boards?
Linux v2.6.7.3 was never official supported by AVR32.

-- 
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:

 >> These are example projects and the user is likely
 >> to want to do things which are specific for his/her kernel.
 >> 
 >> That is easier to do if you set buildroot to use a configuration file.
 >> 

 Hans-Christian> Why?

 Hans-Christian> make linux26-menuconfig works fine.

Agreed.

 >> It is probably safe to remove the 2.6.7.3
 >> 

 Hans-Christian> Hmm, sure, did that have anything to do with the
 Hans-Christian> AVR32 boards?  Linux v2.6.7.3 was never official
 Hans-Christian> supported by AVR32.

I guess there's a 2 missing, E.G. 2.6.27.3 ;)

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Ulf Samuelsson]

fre 2009-01-30 klockan 09:09 +0100 skrev Hans-Christian Egtvedt:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:01:10 +0100
> Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com> wrote:
> 
> > tor 2009-01-29 klockan 10:52 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> > > >>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt
> > > >>>>> <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:
> > > 
> > >  >> Too configs for practically the same kernel version? That
> > >  >> doesn't sound right.
> > >  >> 
> > > 
> > >  Hans-Christian> You can do "make atstk1005_defconfig" and similar
> > > for Hans-Christian> most of the AVR32 boards. The defconfig in the
> > > kernel Hans-Christian> is quite sane.
> > > 
> > > So in other words these files should go away?
> > > 
> > 
> > These are example projects and the user is likely
> > to want to do things which are specific for his/her kernel.
> > 
> > That is easier to do if you set buildroot to use a configuration file.
> > 
> 
> Why?
> 
> make linux26-menuconfig works fine.
> 
> > If you set buildroot to use make defconfig, then the user
> > has to change some other configurations in buildroot
> > to allow change of configuration.
> > 
> 
> Nope, see above.
> 

Try "make linux26-update" with that configuration...

BR
Ulf Samuelsson
 
> > The way buildroot now works is that it will seek
> > for a config version which is smaller or equal 
> > to that of the current kernel.
> > 
> > It is probably safe to remove the 2.6.7.3
> > 
> 
> Hmm, sure, did that have anything to do with the AVR32 boards?
> Linux v2.6.7.3 was never official supported by AVR32.
> 

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel: atstk100x

[Hans-Christian Egtvedt]

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:05:22 +0100
Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com> wrote:

> fre 2009-01-30 klockan 09:09 +0100 skrev Hans-Christian Egtvedt:
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:01:10 +0100
> > Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com> wrote:
> > 

<snipp>

> > > That is easier to do if you set buildroot to use a configuration
> > > file.
> > > 
> > 
> > Why?
> > 
> > make linux26-menuconfig works fine.
> > 
> > > If you set buildroot to use make defconfig, then the user
> > > has to change some other configurations in buildroot
> > > to allow change of configuration.
> > > 
> > 
> > Nope, see above.
> > 
> 
> Try "make linux26-update" with that configuration...
> 

Then linux26-update is broken IMHO.

-- 
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt