[Buildroot] Merge request

[Buildroot] Merge request

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Peter,

I think the following patches from contributors are good for 2010.05.
Could you merge them ?

 * http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034601.html
 * http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034598.html
 * http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034612.html
 * http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034345.html

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] Merge request

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

 Thomas> Peter,
 Thomas> I think the following patches from contributors are good for 2010.05.
 Thomas> Could you merge them ?

 Thomas>  * http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034598.html

I'm not completely happy about adding that one this late in the release
cycle, but I've committed the other 3 - Thanks!

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] Merge request

[Thomas Petazzoni]

On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:21:13 +0200
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:

> I'm not completely happy about adding that one this late in the
> release cycle, but I've committed the other 3 - Thanks!

Why ? This patch isn't modifying any existing code, it just adds new
code. If this code is broken, well, then BeagleBoard support will not
work, but otherwise it wouldn't be supported.

IMO, Yann's changes on package/config clean target were more dangerous
than this one.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] Merge request

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

 Thomas> On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:21:13 +0200
 Thomas> Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:

 >> I'm not completely happy about adding that one this late in the
 >> release cycle, but I've committed the other 3 - Thanks!

 Thomas> Why ? This patch isn't modifying any existing code, it just adds new
 Thomas> code. If this code is broken, well, then BeagleBoard support will not
 Thomas> work, but otherwise it wouldn't be supported.

True, but I would like to sort out all the BR2_BOARD_NAME mess before
adding more, and I don't like the xload package using a "random" git
tree.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard