* [Buildroot] Merge request
@ 2010-05-21 8:29 Thomas Petazzoni
2010-05-22 20:21 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-05-21 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Peter,
I think the following patches from contributors are good for 2010.05.
Could you merge them ?
* http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034601.html
* http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034598.html
* http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034612.html
* http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034345.html
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Merge request
2010-05-21 8:29 [Buildroot] Merge request Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2010-05-22 20:21 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-05-23 8:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2010-05-22 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:
Thomas> Peter,
Thomas> I think the following patches from contributors are good for 2010.05.
Thomas> Could you merge them ?
Thomas> * http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-May/034598.html
I'm not completely happy about adding that one this late in the release
cycle, but I've committed the other 3 - Thanks!
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Merge request
2010-05-22 20:21 ` Peter Korsgaard
@ 2010-05-23 8:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-05-27 12:31 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-05-23 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:21:13 +0200
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:
> I'm not completely happy about adding that one this late in the
> release cycle, but I've committed the other 3 - Thanks!
Why ? This patch isn't modifying any existing code, it just adds new
code. If this code is broken, well, then BeagleBoard support will not
work, but otherwise it wouldn't be supported.
IMO, Yann's changes on package/config clean target were more dangerous
than this one.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Merge request
2010-05-23 8:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2010-05-27 12:31 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2010-05-27 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:
Thomas> On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:21:13 +0200
Thomas> Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:
>> I'm not completely happy about adding that one this late in the
>> release cycle, but I've committed the other 3 - Thanks!
Thomas> Why ? This patch isn't modifying any existing code, it just adds new
Thomas> code. If this code is broken, well, then BeagleBoard support will not
Thomas> work, but otherwise it wouldn't be supported.
True, but I would like to sort out all the BR2_BOARD_NAME mess before
adding more, and I don't like the xload package using a "random" git
tree.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-27 12:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-21 8:29 [Buildroot] Merge request Thomas Petazzoni
2010-05-22 20:21 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-05-23 8:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-05-27 12:31 ` Peter Korsgaard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox