* [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch @ 2010-06-18 21:29 Ossy 2010-06-19 11:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ossy @ 2010-06-18 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Dear mailinglist, I am still not able to make a U-Boot image (uImage) of the linux kernel if I use "Same version as kernel headers". U-Boot is built before trying to make the uImage, but it still gives the following error: ... "mkimage" command not found - U-Boot images will not be built ... Am I forced to install U-Boot (meaning mkimage) on the host? This is not neccessary if using "Advanced configuration". Kind regards, Marcus ossy at debian-virtual:~/buildroot/buildroot-dev$ cat .git/FETCH_HEAD 1e627bf212afff670e414d3ebfc8fb4c4b31c318 branch 'master' of http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch 2010-06-18 21:29 [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch Ossy @ 2010-06-19 11:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni [not found] ` <4C1CC857.50309@gmx.net> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-06-19 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:29:01 +0200 Ossy <ossy1980@gmx.net> wrote: > I am still not able to make a U-Boot image (uImage) of the linux kernel > if I use "Same version as kernel headers". U-Boot is built before trying > to make the uImage, but it still gives the following error: > > ... > "mkimage" command not found - U-Boot images will not be built > ... > > Am I forced to install U-Boot (meaning mkimage) on the host? > This is not neccessary if using "Advanced configuration". Is this a regression of the bootloaders-cleanup branch ? As far as I can see the non-Advanced configuration for the kernel never handled the dependency on host mkimage. So I think it wasn't working before, and it still isn't working. I have another branch, linux-cleanup, that reworks all the code that builds the kernel, so I'm really interested in improving the existing code (of course, if it's a regression, I'll fix it). Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4C1CC857.50309@gmx.net>]
* [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch [not found] ` <4C1CC857.50309@gmx.net> @ 2010-06-19 15:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2010-06-19 16:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-06-19 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, Please keep the list in Cc for Buildroot-related discussions. Thanks! On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:38:31 +0200 Ossy <ossy1980@gmx.net> wrote: > It's true. The Non-Advanced configuration never handled the dependency > on mkimage, so it did not funtion before. I thought, the last big > bootloader patch would fix this dependency. No. However, the linux-cleanup patch removes the non-advanced/advanced configuration schemes for building the Linux kernel to only keep one. > I made a new test with Advanced configuration (the one which worked for > uImage before). I deleted U-Boot and linux-kernel in output-build to be > sure. Now even the Advanced configuration throws this error: > ... > "mkimage" command not found - U-Boot images will not be built > ... Do you have mkimage in output-build/host/usr/bin ? Can you try by removing completely output-build ? > I'm pretty sure, that Advanced configuration worked before. > Do you need my configuration? Yes, I would need to reproduce the issue. So please reproduce the issue from a clean build, even if it involves doing : *) A build from scratch *) Removing some stuff *) Restarting the build I haven't tested the mkimage dependency today, but I've implemented it recently, and as far as I know, Peter tested it before merging the bootloaders-cleanup branch, so I'm quite sure that it works in the default case (i.e, build from scratch). Thanks ! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch 2010-06-19 15:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-06-19 16:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-06-19 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:12:05 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Yes, I would need to reproduce the issue. So please reproduce the issue > from a clean build, even if it involves doing : I managed to reproduce the issue. I will investigate. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-19 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-18 21:29 [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch Ossy
2010-06-19 11:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <4C1CC857.50309@gmx.net>
2010-06-19 15:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-06-19 16:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox