* [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch
@ 2010-06-18 21:29 Ossy
2010-06-19 11:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ossy @ 2010-06-18 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear mailinglist,
I am still not able to make a U-Boot image (uImage) of the linux kernel
if I use "Same version as kernel headers". U-Boot is built before trying
to make the uImage, but it still gives the following error:
...
"mkimage" command not found - U-Boot images will not be built
...
Am I forced to install U-Boot (meaning mkimage) on the host?
This is not neccessary if using "Advanced configuration".
Kind regards,
Marcus
ossy at debian-virtual:~/buildroot/buildroot-dev$ cat .git/FETCH_HEAD
1e627bf212afff670e414d3ebfc8fb4c4b31c318 branch 'master'
of http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch
2010-06-18 21:29 [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch Ossy
@ 2010-06-19 11:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <4C1CC857.50309@gmx.net>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-06-19 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:29:01 +0200
Ossy <ossy1980@gmx.net> wrote:
> I am still not able to make a U-Boot image (uImage) of the linux kernel
> if I use "Same version as kernel headers". U-Boot is built before trying
> to make the uImage, but it still gives the following error:
>
> ...
> "mkimage" command not found - U-Boot images will not be built
> ...
>
> Am I forced to install U-Boot (meaning mkimage) on the host?
> This is not neccessary if using "Advanced configuration".
Is this a regression of the bootloaders-cleanup branch ? As far as I
can see the non-Advanced configuration for the kernel never handled the
dependency on host mkimage. So I think it wasn't working before, and it
still isn't working.
I have another branch, linux-cleanup, that reworks all the code that
builds the kernel, so I'm really interested in improving the existing
code (of course, if it's a regression, I'll fix it).
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch
[not found] ` <4C1CC857.50309@gmx.net>
@ 2010-06-19 15:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-06-19 16:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-06-19 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
Please keep the list in Cc for Buildroot-related discussions. Thanks!
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:38:31 +0200
Ossy <ossy1980@gmx.net> wrote:
> It's true. The Non-Advanced configuration never handled the dependency
> on mkimage, so it did not funtion before. I thought, the last big
> bootloader patch would fix this dependency.
No. However, the linux-cleanup patch removes the non-advanced/advanced
configuration schemes for building the Linux kernel to only keep one.
> I made a new test with Advanced configuration (the one which worked for
> uImage before). I deleted U-Boot and linux-kernel in output-build to be
> sure. Now even the Advanced configuration throws this error:
> ...
> "mkimage" command not found - U-Boot images will not be built
> ...
Do you have mkimage in output-build/host/usr/bin ? Can you try by
removing completely output-build ?
> I'm pretty sure, that Advanced configuration worked before.
> Do you need my configuration?
Yes, I would need to reproduce the issue. So please reproduce the issue
from a clean build, even if it involves doing :
*) A build from scratch
*) Removing some stuff
*) Restarting the build
I haven't tested the mkimage dependency today, but I've implemented it
recently, and as far as I know, Peter tested it before merging the
bootloaders-cleanup branch, so I'm quite sure that it works in the
default case (i.e, build from scratch).
Thanks !
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch
2010-06-19 15:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2010-06-19 16:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2010-06-19 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:12:05 +0200
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Yes, I would need to reproduce the issue. So please reproduce the issue
> from a clean build, even if it involves doing :
I managed to reproduce the issue. I will investigate.
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-19 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-18 21:29 [Buildroot] uImage could not be built before and after big bootloader patch Ossy
2010-06-19 11:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
[not found] ` <4C1CC857.50309@gmx.net>
2010-06-19 15:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-06-19 16:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox