From: Michael S. Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:18:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007290718.59051.minimod@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007290659.39124.minimod@morethan.org>
On Thu July 29 2010, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Thu July 29 2010, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:38:06 -0500
> > "Michael S. Zick" <minimod@morethan.org> wrote:
> >
> > > And of course you confirmed that the Lua package's
> > > error handling still works properly, complete with
> > > same backtrace that is produced when SJLJ exceptions are enabled.
> >
> > No, I did not.
> >
> > > You did make that test didn't you?
> >
> > Why do you need to be so aggressive ? It is possible that removing this
> > option was a mistake, but there's *really* no need to be so
> > aggressive. It only reduces the motivation to look at the problem...
> >
>
> The last time this subject came up on the ML tests seemed to indicate
> that the option was required by the Lua package.
>
> I just presumed you have been following the mailing list postings.
>
> > So, trying to be constructive, how can I test that Lua still produces
> > correct backtraces ? (I'm not a Lua programmer at all).
> >
>
> Pass an illegal value to a library routine or to a routine that you write.
> "Lua" refers to both a set of C libraries and to the interactive mode which
> uses those same libraries.
>
> So testing with the interactive mode should be enough to see a backtrace.
>
> Since the libraries (written in ANSI C) are quite close to the interactive
> environment (usually only one or two calls away) you will not see a very
> long backtrace unless you write a function or two of your own, but you will
> get one.
>
And if you write a function, just to show a longer backtrace:
(functions are first-class values, so they can be written as an assignment)
Try:
mszick at wolf466:~$ lua
Lua 5.1.4 Copyright (C) 1994-2008 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
> bye = function() return os.exit("String Value") end
> bye()
stdin:1: bad argument #1 to 'exit' (number expected, got string)
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'exit'
stdin:1: in function 'bye'
stdin:1: in main chunk
[C]: ?
>
Mike
>
> I.E:
> mszick at wolf466:~$ lua
> Lua 5.1.4 Copyright (C) 1994-2008 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
> > os.exit("String Value")
> stdin:1: bad argument #1 to 'exit' (number expected, got string)
> stack traceback:
> [C]: in function 'exit'
> stdin:1: in main chunk
> [C]: ?
>
> The "[C]" just means that is a hunk of compiled C code, for which the
> language does not have any more information to give you about it.
>
> And: os.exit(0) should get you back out of the interactive Lua (or ctrl-D).
>
> Mike
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 6:30 [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch gcc-remove-options Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 10:38 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 11:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 11:59 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 12:18 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2010-07-29 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 15:09 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 15:11 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 12:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 12:34 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-07-29 12:47 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 13:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: remove multilib Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:53 ` [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch gcc-remove-options Peter Korsgaard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-28 10:10 Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-28 10:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007290718.59051.minimod@morethan.org \
--to=minimod@morethan.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox