From: Michael S. Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:47:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007290747.44044.minimod@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100729143016.07c9a2f0@surf>
On Thu July 29 2010, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:59:36 -0500
> "Michael S. Zick" <minimod@morethan.org> wrote:
>
> > > Why do you need to be so aggressive ? It is possible that removing
> > > this option was a mistake, but there's *really* no need to be so
> > > aggressive. It only reduces the motivation to look at the problem...
> >
> > The last time this subject came up on the ML tests seemed to indicate
> > that the option was required by the Lua package.
> >
> > I just presumed you have been following the mailing list postings.
>
> Sorry, I couldn't find the postings you're refering to. Do you have a
> pointer ?
>
No I don't have a pointer handy.
Look for one of the threads that you terminated discussion with a:
"If you don't like it, you can hire commercial support for it from my firm."
It may even be the same thread where the ethics of using an "Open Source
Project" as a "loss leader" to gain commercial customers was discussed.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 6:30 [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch gcc-remove-options Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 10:38 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 11:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 11:59 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 12:18 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 15:09 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 15:11 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 12:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 12:34 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-07-29 12:47 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2010-07-29 13:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: remove multilib Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:53 ` [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch gcc-remove-options Peter Korsgaard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-28 10:10 Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-28 10:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007290747.44044.minimod@morethan.org \
--to=minimod@morethan.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox