From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:30:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100729163008.468a211e@surf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007290718.59051.minimod@morethan.org>
Hello Michael,
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:18:56 -0500
"Michael S. Zick" <minimod@morethan.org> wrote:
> mszick at wolf466:~$ lua
> Lua 5.1.4 Copyright (C) 1994-2008 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
> > bye = function() return os.exit("String Value") end
> > bye()
> stdin:1: bad argument #1 to 'exit' (number expected, got string)
> stack traceback:
> [C]: in function 'exit'
> stdin:1: in function 'bye'
> stdin:1: in main chunk
> [C]: ?
With the current Buildroot git (i.e, without SJLJ exceptions), I built
an ARM system with Lua, and made your test under Qemu. I had the exact
same output, with the exact same stack trace.
Are more complicated cases likely to make a difference ?
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 6:30 [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch gcc-remove-options Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 10:38 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 11:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 11:59 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 12:18 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2010-07-29 15:09 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 15:11 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 12:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 12:34 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-07-29 12:47 ` Michael S. Zick
2010-07-29 13:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: remove multilib Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-29 6:53 ` [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch gcc-remove-options Peter Korsgaard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-28 10:10 Thomas Petazzoni
2010-07-28 10:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100729163008.468a211e@surf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox