Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] RFC: package patching
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:05:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111118080500.213b42b0@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LVzQpbdCJ3yaQsSREAoNUTjhGLGTgm3izj19m6Z2HJFYg@mail.gmail.com>

Le Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:53:22 +0100,
Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin+buildroot@gmail.com> a ?crit :

> Ok, so an attempt to summarize the discussion so far:

Good idea.

> - most patches should live in package/foo and have a filename of the form:
> <pkg>-<seqnum>-<description>.patch

Agreed.

> - for packages that have multiple versions at once in buildroot,
> patches go into package/foo/foo-version, but have the same filename:
> <pkg>-<seqnum>-<description>.patch

I would name the directory package/<foo>/<version> instead of
package/<foo>/<foo>-<version>, because repeating <foo> is useless.

> - support for <pkg>-<version>-<description>.patch is removed, and all
> existing such patches are renamed/moved according to the rules above.

Agreed.

I also would like to see removed:

 * Support for *.patch.$(ARCH). But that requires some work to get rid
   of the current 4 arch-specific patches that we have for liboil, fbv,
   libmad and jamvm.

 * Support for host-*.patch (which are applied only to the host
   variant). We have only one such patch in the tree (for libgtk2) and
   with a bit of effort, we could make it generic enough so that it
   works on both host and target.

> Some remaining questions:
> * what if a package has multiple versions, and a certain patch applies
> to both versions. Should there be one copy of the patch in
> package/foo, or should the patch be duplicated in
> package/foo/foo-version1 and package/foo/foo-version2 ?

Duplicated.

> * how many digits should the sequence number have? I now that
> git-format-patch uses 4 digits (0001) but really isn't necessary for
> buildroot since the number of patches we'll have for each package is
> limited. A package with 99 patches would already be extraneous, so I'd
> say 01 (2 digits) is enough.
> This may seem like a detail, but discussing this should keep things
> consistent throughout the future.

Agreed that 2 digits is enough.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-18  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-15  8:33 [Buildroot] RFC: package patching Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-11-15  8:45 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-11-15 19:14   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2011-11-15 21:28     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-11-16  6:18       ` Sergey Naumov
2011-11-16  6:50         ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-11-16  6:44       ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-11-16 18:03         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-11-17 13:05           ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-11-17 21:23             ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2011-11-17 21:42               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-11-18  6:53                 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-11-18  7:05                   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2011-11-18  7:34                     ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-11-18  9:26                       ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-11-18 12:24                   ` Michael S. Zick
2011-11-18 19:44                   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2011-11-18 19:27                 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2011-11-19  9:26                   ` Bjørn Forsman
2011-11-19 12:13                     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2011-11-18 16:41             ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111118080500.213b42b0@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox