From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 20:20:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130513202047.6bd6da1b@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51912140.8030901@zacarias.com.ar>
Dear Gustavo Zacarias,
On Mon, 13 May 2013 14:22:08 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> > After your patch, the -D_LARGEFILE_BLABLA stuff is no longer passed
> > when building this package.
> >
> > Another example, the feh package. Another one, input-tools. And I'm
> > sure there are more.
> >
> > So, I agree with the change, but I think it needs a much thorough
> > investigation of which packages are using $(TARGET_CFLAGS) without
> > passing $(TARGET_CPPFLAGS).
>
> On the build-side of things there aren't any unexpected build failures
> (allyespackageconfig that lead to my latest fixes because of other issues).
Build failures no, but packages not having large file support because
-D_LARGEFILE_BLA is not passed, cerainly.
> This is meant as a first try and i'm sure there will be packages that'll
> need to be modified, but we'd rather do this sooner rather than later,
> specially if we want to push new autotools where -D* isn't acceptable in
> CFLAGS (be it via auto* bump + autoreconf or just plain shipped
> configure in packages based on newer autotools).
Agreed.
> We could also filter out for "strict" (new auto* packages) too, but
> that's a sloppy way downhill.
Yes, we probably don't want to do that.
> I just want to keep this patchset apart from the package-fixing one,
> since it's likely this won't change much and i'm not a fan of 1/N with N
> being a huge number just to add a few patchfixes here/there (with the
> fix patches maybe even getting commited before this patchset - it
> shouldn't hurt).
I believe there should be first an audit of where TARGET_CFLAGS is
used. Then, wherever needed, fixes to ensure both TARGET_CFLAGS and
TARGET_CPPFLAGS are used (or, if possible, usage of
TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS). Once those fixes are made, your patch that
separates TARGET_CPPFLAGS from TARGET_CFLAGS can go in.
A quick "grep TARGET_CFLAGS" in package/ gives 110 packages using it.
In most cases, it's probably $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) being passed +
CFLAGS="$(TARGET_CFLAGS) -bleh", which is already correct seems
CPPFLAGS is passed. But of course there might be packages that use a
custom Makefile that obeys to CFLAGS but not CPPFLAGS. Not sure what we
can do about these except slowly figuring out that they need fixing.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 16:40 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/6] libnspr: bump to version 4.9.6 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/6] libnss: bump to version 3.14.3 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-26 20:14 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/6] libcurl: bump to version 7.30.0 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-14 22:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 22:47 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/6] p11-kit: new package Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/6] gnutls: bump to version 3.2.0 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-14 22:36 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 22:49 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-16 6:17 ` [Buildroot] Config options for optional dependencies [was: [PATCH 6/6] gnutls: bump to version 3.2.0] Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-16 8:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 17:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 17:22 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 18:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-05-13 22:09 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 23:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 7:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-14 8:54 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130513202047.6bd6da1b@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox