From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:54:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5191FBDA.5090805@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130514091727.18efb29e@skate>
On 14/05/13 09:17, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
>
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 01:02:45 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>
>> TARGET_CPPFLAGS is _only_ used to set the largefile defines. So I think
>> it's much easier to leave it out entirely, and pass those defines in
>> CFLAGS. There may be one or two packages that break because they rely on
>> correct CPPFLAGS, but for these we can send the largefile defines explicitly.
>>
>> So:
>>
>> TARGET_LARGEFILE_CFLAGS = -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE ...
>>
>> TARGET_CFLAGS = $(TARGET_LARGEFILE_CFLAGS) ...
>>
>> Remove the CPPFLAGS="$(TARGET_CPPFLAGS)" from TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS
>
> No, that's precisely the problem Gustavo had: newer autotools version
> do *NOT* want to have -D_BLABLA in CFLAGS, they only accept it in
> CPPFLAGS.
>
> See the original patch from Gustavo:
>
> """
> CPPFLAGS don't belong in CFLAGS, and newer autoconf versions just error
> out when it's used that way.
> """
>
> So the whole purpose of the discussion is precisely that we can't any
> longer pass the -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE in TARGET_CFLAGS :)
Okay my bad. I thought the issue was that CPPFLAGS were duplicated in
CFLAGS.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-14 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 16:40 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/6] libnspr: bump to version 4.9.6 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/6] libnss: bump to version 3.14.3 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-26 20:14 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/6] libcurl: bump to version 7.30.0 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-14 22:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 22:47 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/6] p11-kit: new package Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/6] gnutls: bump to version 3.2.0 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-14 22:36 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 22:49 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-16 6:17 ` [Buildroot] Config options for optional dependencies [was: [PATCH 6/6] gnutls: bump to version 3.2.0] Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-16 8:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 17:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 17:22 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 18:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 22:09 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 23:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 7:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-14 8:54 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5191FBDA.5090805@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox