* [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 1/2] valgrind: let the valgrind configure script detect TLS availability
@ 2016-08-30 21:33 Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-30 21:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 2/2] gcc: remove BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS option Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-31 19:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 1/2] valgrind: let the valgrind configure script detect TLS availability Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-08-30 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Back in 2005, in commit
a2c326396a43ecbc8d02c3d815d4010a7ba2e004 ("update valgrind to the latest
and greatest"), an explicit --disable-tls option was added. More
recently, in commit 31a3f4bd54e12b8d6de286ab8fb6d9651990e2f5 ("valgrind:
enable tls support") changed this to be conditional on
BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS.
However, the configure script of valgrind is perfectly capable of
detecting TLS support, even in a cross-compilation case: it tries to
compile a program that uses __thread and sees if it works.
Since we're about to modify how BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS is handled, we'd
better remove its usage from packages, and valgrind is the only package
using this config option.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
---
Changes since v1:
- Added Arnout Reviewed-by.
---
package/valgrind/valgrind.mk | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/valgrind/valgrind.mk b/package/valgrind/valgrind.mk
index 46ba13e..b97d446 100644
--- a/package/valgrind/valgrind.mk
+++ b/package/valgrind/valgrind.mk
@@ -15,12 +15,6 @@ VALGRIND_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
# patch 0004-Fixes-for-musl-libc.patch touching configure.ac
VALGRIND_AUTORECONF = YES
-ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS),y)
-VALGRIND_CONF_OPTS += --enable-tls
-else
-VALGRIND_CONF_OPTS += --disable-tls
-endif
-
# When Valgrind detects a 32-bit MIPS architecture, it forcibly adds
# -march=mips32 to CFLAGS; when it detects a 64-bit MIPS architecture,
# it forcibly adds -march=mips64. This causes Valgrind to be built
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 2/2] gcc: remove BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS option
2016-08-30 21:33 [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 1/2] valgrind: let the valgrind configure script detect TLS availability Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2016-08-30 21:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-30 22:58 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-08-31 19:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 1/2] valgrind: let the valgrind configure script detect TLS availability Thomas Petazzoni
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-08-30 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
The current BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS can cause users to make incorrect
choices, and is not very useful. This options allows to decide whether
we pass --enable-tls or --disable-tls to gcc, to enable or disable
support for Thread Local Storage.
Its behavior is:
- The option is default to "y" but only exists if we're using
uClibc/NPTL or glibc.
- When we're using uClibc, the option can be disabled.
So, in practice, this means that currently:
- TLS support is always on for glibc
- TLS support is on by default for uClibc/NPTL, but can be disabled in
the configuration. This is in fact bad and causes the build failure
reported in bug #7424 (this bug is still reproducible on master)
- TLS support is always disabled for uClibc/no-thread and
uClibc/linuxthreads.
- TLS support is always disabled for musl. This does not cause any
build failure, but musl can use TLS support, and therefore be more
efficient. According to
http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2012/10/04/1, "Note that if you've
been building gcc with --disable-tls, __thread was already working
but gets emulated (very poorly; it's slow and will abort() if it runs
out of memory) through libgcc.".
So, this commit completely removes the BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS and instead
makes the right choice inside gcc.mk directly:
- TLS support enabled for glibc, musl and uClibc/NPTL
- TLS support in other cases, i.e uClibc/no-thread and
uClibc/linuxthreads.
We have intentionally *not* added the option to
Config.in.legacy. Indeed, the new behavior is *exactly* the same as the
older behavior, with the exception of:
- People can no longer disable TLS support in uClibc/NPTL, which was
anyway causing a build failure and therefore was not used.
- TLS support is now enabled on musl, but people using musl already had
BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS not set, so they wouldn't get the legacy warning.
Fixes bug #7424.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Invert the condition logic, to make it simpler. Suggested by Arnout.
---
package/gcc/Config.in.host | 8 --------
package/gcc/gcc.mk | 9 ++++++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/gcc/Config.in.host b/package/gcc/Config.in.host
index 37728e0..8ed946b 100644
--- a/package/gcc/Config.in.host
+++ b/package/gcc/Config.in.host
@@ -148,14 +148,6 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_FORTRAN
Fortran language and you want Fortran libraries to be
installed on your target system.
-config BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS
- bool "Enable compiler tls support" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC
- default y
- depends on BR2_PTHREADS_NATIVE || BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_GLIBC
- help
- Enable the compiler to generate code for accessing
- thread local storage variables
-
config BR2_GCC_ENABLE_LTO
bool "Enable compiler link-time-optimization support"
select BR2_BINUTILS_ENABLE_LTO
diff --git a/package/gcc/gcc.mk b/package/gcc/gcc.mk
index 39c3eeb..82050b4 100644
--- a/package/gcc/gcc.mk
+++ b/package/gcc/gcc.mk
@@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ ifeq ($(BR2_sparc)$(BR2_sparc64),y)
HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --disable-libsanitizer
endif
-ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS),y)
-HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --enable-tls
-else
+# TLS support is not needed on uClibc/no-thread and
+# uClibc/linux-threads, otherwise, for all other situations (glibc,
+# musl and uClibc/NPTL), we need it.
+ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC)$(BR2_PTHREADS)$(BR2_PTHREADS_NONE),yy)
HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --disable-tls
+else
+HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --enable-tls
endif
ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_ENABLE_LTO),y)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 2/2] gcc: remove BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS option
2016-08-30 21:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 2/2] gcc: remove BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS option Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2016-08-30 22:58 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-08-31 7:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2016-08-30 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On 30-08-16 23:33, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
[snip]
> So, this commit completely removes the BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS and instead
> makes the right choice inside gcc.mk directly:
>
> - TLS support enabled for glibc, musl and uClibc/NPTL
>
> - TLS support in other cases, i.e uClibc/no-thread and
> uClibc/linuxthreads.
[snip]
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Invert the condition logic, to make it simpler. Suggested by Arnout.
> ---
[snip]
> diff --git a/package/gcc/gcc.mk b/package/gcc/gcc.mk
> index 39c3eeb..82050b4 100644
> --- a/package/gcc/gcc.mk
> +++ b/package/gcc/gcc.mk
> @@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ ifeq ($(BR2_sparc)$(BR2_sparc64),y)
> HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --disable-libsanitizer
> endif
>
> -ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS),y)
> -HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --enable-tls
> -else
> +# TLS support is not needed on uClibc/no-thread and
I thought it was not even available for nothread or linuxthreads?
But anyway:
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
> +# uClibc/linux-threads, otherwise, for all other situations (glibc,
> +# musl and uClibc/NPTL), we need it.
> +ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC)$(BR2_PTHREADS)$(BR2_PTHREADS_NONE),yy)
> HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --disable-tls
> +else
> +HOST_GCC_COMMON_CONF_OPTS += --enable-tls
> endif
>
> ifeq ($(BR2_GCC_ENABLE_LTO),y)
>
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 2/2] gcc: remove BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS option
2016-08-30 22:58 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
@ 2016-08-31 7:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-08-31 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:58:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > +# TLS support is not needed on uClibc/no-thread and
>
> I thought it was not even available for nothread or linuxthreads?
Well: TLS support is provided by the compiler and used by the C
library. At least that's how I see it. Since here we are in gcc.mk, we
are talking from the point of the view of the compiler, hence the "TLS
support is not needed for <this C library> variant".
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 1/2] valgrind: let the valgrind configure script detect TLS availability
2016-08-30 21:33 [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 1/2] valgrind: let the valgrind configure script detect TLS availability Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-30 21:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 2/2] gcc: remove BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS option Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2016-08-31 19:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-08-31 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 23:33:27 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Back in 2005, in commit
> a2c326396a43ecbc8d02c3d815d4010a7ba2e004 ("update valgrind to the latest
> and greatest"), an explicit --disable-tls option was added. More
> recently, in commit 31a3f4bd54e12b8d6de286ab8fb6d9651990e2f5 ("valgrind:
> enable tls support") changed this to be conditional on
> BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS.
>
> However, the configure script of valgrind is perfectly capable of
> detecting TLS support, even in a cross-compilation case: it tries to
> compile a program that uses __thread and sees if it works.
>
> Since we're about to modify how BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS is handled, we'd
> better remove its usage from packages, and valgrind is the only package
> using this config option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Added Arnout Reviewed-by.
> ---
> package/valgrind/valgrind.mk | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
I've applied both patches to next.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-31 19:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-30 21:33 [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 1/2] valgrind: let the valgrind configure script detect TLS availability Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-30 21:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 2/2] gcc: remove BR2_GCC_ENABLE_TLS option Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-30 22:58 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-08-31 7:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-31 19:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v2 1/2] valgrind: let the valgrind configure script detect TLS availability Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox