From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] rpi-firmware: do not rename startup files
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200625213157.GW20645@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFs+hh6XDH80-Sk9DG95ez7vEF4XJR=DrqAgjzZK7xcm42SrzQ@mail.gmail.com>
St?phane, All,
On 2020-06-25 19:30 +0200, St?phane Veyret spake thusly:
> > > Le jeu. 25 juin 2020 ? 18:23, Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net> a ?crit :
> > > > > I think we should instead force the name of the startup files in the
> > > > > config.txt (in package/rpi-firmware/config.txt):
> > > > > start_file=start.elf
> > > > > fixup_file=fixup.dat
> > > > Or one step further, copy the start/fixup file verbatim and only change the
> > > > start_file/fixup_file entry in config.txt (with the advantage to make it
> > > > transparent which files are installed/in-use)...
> > > If the file name is already the appropriate one (this is the first
> > > version of my patch), using start_file and fixup_file is useless. And
> > > I don't feel it is a good idea to set start_file and fixup_file if the
> > > files already have expected names, because using these options is
> > > discouraged: https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/configuration/config-txt/boot.md.
> > The options are not discouraged, but 'advanced options' and should be handled with care ;-)
> > The advantage of the explicit start_file/fixup_file entries is that it is clear/determined
> > which files are used (instead of relaying on the RPi 'magic' depending on the combination
> > of other options)....
> OK, I understand. Yann, do you agree? Shall I create a v3 patch?
I do agree that we better force the names of the file to load, yes.
No, you do not need to send a v3, as I explained in my reply to Peter.
I'll will probably apply your v2 patch as-is shortly...
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-25 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-24 11:50 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] rpi-firmware: do not rename startup files Stéphane Veyret
2020-06-24 16:54 ` Yann E. MORIN
2020-06-25 16:23 ` Peter Seiderer
2020-06-25 16:38 ` Stéphane Veyret
2020-06-25 17:20 ` Peter Seiderer
2020-06-25 17:30 ` Stéphane Veyret
2020-06-25 21:31 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2020-06-25 19:50 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200625213157.GW20645@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox