From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>, buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] kconfig/lxdialog: fix check() with GCC14
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 22:36:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240408223621.39b37892@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403121807.2087547-1-robimarko@gmail.com>
Hello Robert,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:18:07 +0200
Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com> wrote:
> GCC14 now treats implicit int types as error so when check() from
> check-lxdialog.sh is called to check whether we can link against ncurses
> it will fail silently and the help text indicating to install ncurses is
> printed.
>
> However, this is not due to missing ncurses but once the stderr redirect
> to /dev/null is removed we can see the root cause:
> <stdin>:2:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
>
> So, in order for menuconfig to work with GCC14 lets just specify the
> return type of main() as int.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Thanks a lot for the patch. However, making changes in support/kconfig/
in Buildroot requires a bit more care. Indeed, this code is taken from
the Linux kernel code, and we try to keep a well-defined list of
changes on top of the original code from the kernel.
As explained in support/kconfig/README.buildroot, the current code in
support/kconfig/ is taken from Linux 4.17-rc2, on top of which the
patches in support/kconfig/patches/ have been applied.
So from this, you have two options:
(1) Add a new patch in support/kconfig/patches/ which implements the
change you need for GCC14 compatibility
(2) Update the code in support/kconfig/ to the latest code available in
the Linux kernel scripts/kconfig directory, rebase our patches, and
verify it all works.
Obviously, (1) is the easiest path. (2) is nicer long term, as we
benefit from all new features/fixes added by the Linux kernel
developers. Turns out that in the upstream kernel, the
check-lxdialog.sh script has been removed and replaced by something
different, which no longer has this main() function definition.
Could you have a look at implementing either (1) or (2) ?
Thanks a lot!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 12:18 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] kconfig/lxdialog: fix check() with GCC14 Robert Marko
2024-04-03 16:28 ` Petr Vorel
2024-04-08 20:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
2024-04-08 21:15 ` Robert Marko
2024-04-08 21:38 ` Petr Vorel
2024-04-09 19:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2024-04-09 20:50 ` Yann E. MORIN
2024-04-11 0:15 ` Petr Vorel
2024-04-11 5:02 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240408223621.39b37892@windsurf \
--to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=petr.vorel@gmail.com \
--cc=robimarko@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox