* [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot
@ 2008-02-10 2:28 John Voltz
2008-02-10 3:04 ` Ormund Williams
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Voltz @ 2008-02-10 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
I'm wondering if the buildroot maintainers frequent this list, and if
so, how do you feel about receiving a humongous patch for it? I've
been working on bugfixes for well over a week now and I believe it's
going to be a huge patch. It would take me weeks more to break it into
individual patches. So far I've fixed a bunch of incorrect package
install arguments that cause problems with pkgconfig and libtool
resulting in build failures. I've added the X.org fonts and some other
missing X.org packages, icu, fltk, webkit, midori, ipkg, updated
cairo, pango, gtk, and glib to the latest versions. I also merged the
current branch of the Atmel AVR32 buildroot architecture for that CPU.
Is there any interest in it, or should I just keep it to myself?
Kind regards,
John Voltz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot
2008-02-10 2:28 [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot John Voltz
@ 2008-02-10 3:04 ` Ormund Williams
2008-02-10 16:49 ` Ivan Kuten
2008-02-10 23:23 ` Hamish Moffatt
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ormund Williams @ 2008-02-10 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 21:28 -0500, John Voltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if the buildroot maintainers frequent this list, and if
> so, how do you feel about receiving a humongous patch for it? I've
> been working on bugfixes for well over a week now and I believe it's
> going to be a huge patch. It would take me weeks more to break it into
> individual patches. So far I've fixed a bunch of incorrect package
> install arguments that cause problems with pkgconfig and libtool
> resulting in build failures. I've added the X.org fonts and some other
> missing X.org packages, icu, fltk, webkit, midori, ipkg, updated
> cairo, pango, gtk, and glib to the latest versions. I also merged the
> current branch of the Atmel AVR32 buildroot architecture for that CPU.
> Is there any interest in it, or should I just keep it to myself?
>
Do NOT keep it to yourself. If the buildroot maintainers wont accept it
and you don't have time to break it up into smaller patches, I'll do it.
Thanks for the work.
__
Ormund
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot
2008-02-10 2:28 [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot John Voltz
2008-02-10 3:04 ` Ormund Williams
@ 2008-02-10 16:49 ` Ivan Kuten
2008-02-10 23:23 ` Hamish Moffatt
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ivan Kuten @ 2008-02-10 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi John,
Of course please post your patch. Even if the patch too huge somebody will split it.
Regards,
Ivan
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if the buildroot maintainers frequent this list, and if
> so, how do you feel about receiving a humongous patch for it? I've
> been working on bugfixes for well over a week now and I believe it's
> going to be a huge patch. It would take me weeks more to break it into
> individual patches. So far I've fixed a bunch of incorrect package
> install arguments that cause problems with pkgconfig and libtool
> resulting in build failures. I've added the X.org fonts and some other
> missing X.org packages, icu, fltk, webkit, midori, ipkg, updated
> cairo, pango, gtk, and glib to the latest versions. I also merged the
> current branch of the Atmel AVR32 buildroot architecture for that CPU.
> Is there any interest in it, or should I just keep it to myself?
>
> Kind regards,
> John Voltz
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot
2008-02-10 2:28 [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot John Voltz
2008-02-10 3:04 ` Ormund Williams
2008-02-10 16:49 ` Ivan Kuten
@ 2008-02-10 23:23 ` Hamish Moffatt
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hamish Moffatt @ 2008-02-10 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 09:28:35PM -0500, John Voltz wrote:
> I'm wondering if the buildroot maintainers frequent this list, and if
> so, how do you feel about receiving a humongous patch for it? I've
> been working on bugfixes for well over a week now and I believe it's
> going to be a huge patch. It would take me weeks more to break it into
> individual patches. So far I've fixed a bunch of incorrect package
> install arguments that cause problems with pkgconfig and libtool
> resulting in build failures. I've added the X.org fonts and some other
> missing X.org packages, icu, fltk, webkit, midori, ipkg, updated
> cairo, pango, gtk, and glib to the latest versions. I also merged the
> current branch of the Atmel AVR32 buildroot architecture for that CPU.
> Is there any interest in it, or should I just keep it to myself?
I think it would help if you can separate it to some extent eg the AVR32
branch separate from X changes separate from the build fixes.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-10 23:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-10 2:28 [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot John Voltz
2008-02-10 3:04 ` Ormund Williams
2008-02-10 16:49 ` Ivan Kuten
2008-02-10 23:23 ` Hamish Moffatt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox